Convergent models of handedness and brain lateralization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The pervasive nature of handedness across human history and cultures is a salient consequence of brain lateralization. This paper presents evidence that provides a model for understanding the motor control processes that give rise to handedness. According to the Dynamic Dominance Model, the left hemisphere (in right handers) is proficient for processes that predict the effects of body and environmental dynamics, while the right hemisphere is proficient at impedance control processes that can minimize potential errors when faced with unexpected mechanical conditions, and can achieve accurate steady-state positions. This model can be viewed as a motor component for the paradigm of brain lateralization that has been proposed by Rogers and colleagues [1] that is based upon evidence from a wide range of behaviors across many vertebrate species. Rogers proposed a left-hemisphere specialization for well-established patterns of behavior performed in familiar environmental conditions, and a right hemisphere specialization for responding to unforeseen environmental events. The dynamic dominance hypothesis provides a framework for understanding the biology of motor lateralization that is consistent with Rogers paradigm of brain lateralization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1092
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume5
Issue numberSEP
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Functional Laterality
Brain
Electric Impedance
Vertebrates
History

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{60a186d71af849418aafd1550df4b3db,
title = "Convergent models of handedness and brain lateralization",
abstract = "The pervasive nature of handedness across human history and cultures is a salient consequence of brain lateralization. This paper presents evidence that provides a model for understanding the motor control processes that give rise to handedness. According to the Dynamic Dominance Model, the left hemisphere (in right handers) is proficient for processes that predict the effects of body and environmental dynamics, while the right hemisphere is proficient at impedance control processes that can minimize potential errors when faced with unexpected mechanical conditions, and can achieve accurate steady-state positions. This model can be viewed as a motor component for the paradigm of brain lateralization that has been proposed by Rogers and colleagues [1] that is based upon evidence from a wide range of behaviors across many vertebrate species. Rogers proposed a left-hemisphere specialization for well-established patterns of behavior performed in familiar environmental conditions, and a right hemisphere specialization for responding to unforeseen environmental events. The dynamic dominance hypothesis provides a framework for understanding the biology of motor lateralization that is consistent with Rogers paradigm of brain lateralization.",
author = "Sainburg, {Robert L.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01092",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "SEP",

}

Convergent models of handedness and brain lateralization. / Sainburg, Robert L.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 5, No. SEP, 1092, 01.01.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Convergent models of handedness and brain lateralization

AU - Sainburg, Robert L.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - The pervasive nature of handedness across human history and cultures is a salient consequence of brain lateralization. This paper presents evidence that provides a model for understanding the motor control processes that give rise to handedness. According to the Dynamic Dominance Model, the left hemisphere (in right handers) is proficient for processes that predict the effects of body and environmental dynamics, while the right hemisphere is proficient at impedance control processes that can minimize potential errors when faced with unexpected mechanical conditions, and can achieve accurate steady-state positions. This model can be viewed as a motor component for the paradigm of brain lateralization that has been proposed by Rogers and colleagues [1] that is based upon evidence from a wide range of behaviors across many vertebrate species. Rogers proposed a left-hemisphere specialization for well-established patterns of behavior performed in familiar environmental conditions, and a right hemisphere specialization for responding to unforeseen environmental events. The dynamic dominance hypothesis provides a framework for understanding the biology of motor lateralization that is consistent with Rogers paradigm of brain lateralization.

AB - The pervasive nature of handedness across human history and cultures is a salient consequence of brain lateralization. This paper presents evidence that provides a model for understanding the motor control processes that give rise to handedness. According to the Dynamic Dominance Model, the left hemisphere (in right handers) is proficient for processes that predict the effects of body and environmental dynamics, while the right hemisphere is proficient at impedance control processes that can minimize potential errors when faced with unexpected mechanical conditions, and can achieve accurate steady-state positions. This model can be viewed as a motor component for the paradigm of brain lateralization that has been proposed by Rogers and colleagues [1] that is based upon evidence from a wide range of behaviors across many vertebrate species. Rogers proposed a left-hemisphere specialization for well-established patterns of behavior performed in familiar environmental conditions, and a right hemisphere specialization for responding to unforeseen environmental events. The dynamic dominance hypothesis provides a framework for understanding the biology of motor lateralization that is consistent with Rogers paradigm of brain lateralization.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907953042&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907953042&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01092

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01092

M3 - Article

C2 - 25339923

AN - SCOPUS:84907953042

VL - 5

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

IS - SEP

M1 - 1092

ER -