Conversion of an academic health sciences library to a near-total electronic library: Part 1

Virginia A. Lingle, Cynthia K. Robinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the last ten years, many health sciences libraries have gradually converted their collections from predominantly print journal subscriptions to electronic-only subscriptions. This is being driven by budget, space issues, and user preference. The desire to retain both the print and electronic versions of journal titles has proven to be unsustainable for many health sciences libraries in the face of flat or shrinking budgets and increased demand at the institutional level for space. Due to demand for space for a clinical simulation facility at the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, the George T. Harrell Health Sciences Library was faced with the need to accelerate the shift to primarily an electronic collection when more than 80% of the print journals and 20% of the print book collection were removed from the library. A case had to be made to the college administration that the older literature was still utilized and had value-and that it would be worthwhile to selectively purchase the electronic "backfiles" or archival files to replace high-use print journals. Harrell HSL users were expected to make a fairly seamless transition to such a dramatic culture shift in the collection, but at the onset it was unclear whether this assumption would prove to be true. This article is the first part of a two-part article that will review some of the methodology and processes used to prove the value of the library collection, to make the decisions about which materials to keep, and to select electronic journal backfiles for purchase. The second part of this article will discuss the decisions that resulted from the data analysis, the subsequent actions that were taken to remove the collection, why certain backfiles were selected for purchase, and the impact on both library users and library staff workflow.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)193-210
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2009

Fingerprint

Medical Libraries
health science
Libraries
electronics
Budgets
purchase
subscription
Workflow
budget
demand
workflow
Medicine
Values
data analysis
medicine
staff
simulation
methodology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

@article{5962a5ea0a0f4a7a92435d80b67c18a8,
title = "Conversion of an academic health sciences library to a near-total electronic library: Part 1",
abstract = "In the last ten years, many health sciences libraries have gradually converted their collections from predominantly print journal subscriptions to electronic-only subscriptions. This is being driven by budget, space issues, and user preference. The desire to retain both the print and electronic versions of journal titles has proven to be unsustainable for many health sciences libraries in the face of flat or shrinking budgets and increased demand at the institutional level for space. Due to demand for space for a clinical simulation facility at the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, the George T. Harrell Health Sciences Library was faced with the need to accelerate the shift to primarily an electronic collection when more than 80{\%} of the print journals and 20{\%} of the print book collection were removed from the library. A case had to be made to the college administration that the older literature was still utilized and had value-and that it would be worthwhile to selectively purchase the electronic {"}backfiles{"} or archival files to replace high-use print journals. Harrell HSL users were expected to make a fairly seamless transition to such a dramatic culture shift in the collection, but at the onset it was unclear whether this assumption would prove to be true. This article is the first part of a two-part article that will review some of the methodology and processes used to prove the value of the library collection, to make the decisions about which materials to keep, and to select electronic journal backfiles for purchase. The second part of this article will discuss the decisions that resulted from the data analysis, the subsequent actions that were taken to remove the collection, why certain backfiles were selected for purchase, and the impact on both library users and library staff workflow.",
author = "Lingle, {Virginia A.} and Robinson, {Cynthia K.}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15424060903178879",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "193--210",
journal = "Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries",
issn = "1542-4065",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Conversion of an academic health sciences library to a near-total electronic library : Part 1. / Lingle, Virginia A.; Robinson, Cynthia K.

In: Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, Vol. 6, No. 3, 01.07.2009, p. 193-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conversion of an academic health sciences library to a near-total electronic library

T2 - Part 1

AU - Lingle, Virginia A.

AU - Robinson, Cynthia K.

PY - 2009/7/1

Y1 - 2009/7/1

N2 - In the last ten years, many health sciences libraries have gradually converted their collections from predominantly print journal subscriptions to electronic-only subscriptions. This is being driven by budget, space issues, and user preference. The desire to retain both the print and electronic versions of journal titles has proven to be unsustainable for many health sciences libraries in the face of flat or shrinking budgets and increased demand at the institutional level for space. Due to demand for space for a clinical simulation facility at the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, the George T. Harrell Health Sciences Library was faced with the need to accelerate the shift to primarily an electronic collection when more than 80% of the print journals and 20% of the print book collection were removed from the library. A case had to be made to the college administration that the older literature was still utilized and had value-and that it would be worthwhile to selectively purchase the electronic "backfiles" or archival files to replace high-use print journals. Harrell HSL users were expected to make a fairly seamless transition to such a dramatic culture shift in the collection, but at the onset it was unclear whether this assumption would prove to be true. This article is the first part of a two-part article that will review some of the methodology and processes used to prove the value of the library collection, to make the decisions about which materials to keep, and to select electronic journal backfiles for purchase. The second part of this article will discuss the decisions that resulted from the data analysis, the subsequent actions that were taken to remove the collection, why certain backfiles were selected for purchase, and the impact on both library users and library staff workflow.

AB - In the last ten years, many health sciences libraries have gradually converted their collections from predominantly print journal subscriptions to electronic-only subscriptions. This is being driven by budget, space issues, and user preference. The desire to retain both the print and electronic versions of journal titles has proven to be unsustainable for many health sciences libraries in the face of flat or shrinking budgets and increased demand at the institutional level for space. Due to demand for space for a clinical simulation facility at the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, the George T. Harrell Health Sciences Library was faced with the need to accelerate the shift to primarily an electronic collection when more than 80% of the print journals and 20% of the print book collection were removed from the library. A case had to be made to the college administration that the older literature was still utilized and had value-and that it would be worthwhile to selectively purchase the electronic "backfiles" or archival files to replace high-use print journals. Harrell HSL users were expected to make a fairly seamless transition to such a dramatic culture shift in the collection, but at the onset it was unclear whether this assumption would prove to be true. This article is the first part of a two-part article that will review some of the methodology and processes used to prove the value of the library collection, to make the decisions about which materials to keep, and to select electronic journal backfiles for purchase. The second part of this article will discuss the decisions that resulted from the data analysis, the subsequent actions that were taken to remove the collection, why certain backfiles were selected for purchase, and the impact on both library users and library staff workflow.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75149128995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75149128995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15424060903178879

DO - 10.1080/15424060903178879

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:75149128995

VL - 6

SP - 193

EP - 210

JO - Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries

JF - Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries

SN - 1542-4065

IS - 3

ER -