Coordination between child welfare agencies and mental health service providers, children's service use, and outcomes

Yu Bai, Rebecca Wells, Marianne Messersmith Hillemeier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Interorganizational relationships (IORs) between child welfare agencies and mental health service providers may facilitate mental health treatment access for vulnerable children. This study investigates whether IORs are associated with greater use of mental health services and improvement in mental health status for children served by the child welfare system. Methods: This was a longitudinal analysis of data from a 36-month period in the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW). The sample consisted of 1,613 children within 75 child welfare agencies who were 2 years or older and had mental health problems at baseline. IOR intensity was measured as the number of coordination approaches between each child welfare agency and mental health service providers. Separate weighted multilevel logistic regression models tested associations between IORs and service use and outcomes, respectively. Results: Agency-level factors accounted for 9% of the variance in the probability of service use and 12% of mental health improvement. Greater intensity of IORs was associated with higher likelihood of both service use and mental health improvement. Conclusions: Having greater numbers of ties with mental health providers may help child welfare agencies improve children's mental health service access and outcomes. Practice implications: Policymakers should develop policies and initiatives to encourage a combination of different types of organizational ties between child welfare and mental health systems. For instance, information sharing at the agency level in addition to coordination at the case level may improve the coordination necessary to serve these vulnerable children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)372-381
Number of pages10
JournalChild Abuse and Neglect
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2009

Fingerprint

Mental Health Services
Mental Health
Child Welfare
Logistic Models
Child Health Services
Information Dissemination
Health Status
Child Protective Services

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{e5bb6c94149a48b1881c5d5369c37a25,
title = "Coordination between child welfare agencies and mental health service providers, children's service use, and outcomes",
abstract = "Objective: Interorganizational relationships (IORs) between child welfare agencies and mental health service providers may facilitate mental health treatment access for vulnerable children. This study investigates whether IORs are associated with greater use of mental health services and improvement in mental health status for children served by the child welfare system. Methods: This was a longitudinal analysis of data from a 36-month period in the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW). The sample consisted of 1,613 children within 75 child welfare agencies who were 2 years or older and had mental health problems at baseline. IOR intensity was measured as the number of coordination approaches between each child welfare agency and mental health service providers. Separate weighted multilevel logistic regression models tested associations between IORs and service use and outcomes, respectively. Results: Agency-level factors accounted for 9{\%} of the variance in the probability of service use and 12{\%} of mental health improvement. Greater intensity of IORs was associated with higher likelihood of both service use and mental health improvement. Conclusions: Having greater numbers of ties with mental health providers may help child welfare agencies improve children's mental health service access and outcomes. Practice implications: Policymakers should develop policies and initiatives to encourage a combination of different types of organizational ties between child welfare and mental health systems. For instance, information sharing at the agency level in addition to coordination at the case level may improve the coordination necessary to serve these vulnerable children.",
author = "Yu Bai and Rebecca Wells and Hillemeier, {Marianne Messersmith}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.10.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "372--381",
journal = "Child Abuse and Neglect",
issn = "0145-2134",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "6",

}

Coordination between child welfare agencies and mental health service providers, children's service use, and outcomes. / Bai, Yu; Wells, Rebecca; Hillemeier, Marianne Messersmith.

In: Child Abuse and Neglect, Vol. 33, No. 6, 01.06.2009, p. 372-381.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coordination between child welfare agencies and mental health service providers, children's service use, and outcomes

AU - Bai, Yu

AU - Wells, Rebecca

AU - Hillemeier, Marianne Messersmith

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - Objective: Interorganizational relationships (IORs) between child welfare agencies and mental health service providers may facilitate mental health treatment access for vulnerable children. This study investigates whether IORs are associated with greater use of mental health services and improvement in mental health status for children served by the child welfare system. Methods: This was a longitudinal analysis of data from a 36-month period in the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW). The sample consisted of 1,613 children within 75 child welfare agencies who were 2 years or older and had mental health problems at baseline. IOR intensity was measured as the number of coordination approaches between each child welfare agency and mental health service providers. Separate weighted multilevel logistic regression models tested associations between IORs and service use and outcomes, respectively. Results: Agency-level factors accounted for 9% of the variance in the probability of service use and 12% of mental health improvement. Greater intensity of IORs was associated with higher likelihood of both service use and mental health improvement. Conclusions: Having greater numbers of ties with mental health providers may help child welfare agencies improve children's mental health service access and outcomes. Practice implications: Policymakers should develop policies and initiatives to encourage a combination of different types of organizational ties between child welfare and mental health systems. For instance, information sharing at the agency level in addition to coordination at the case level may improve the coordination necessary to serve these vulnerable children.

AB - Objective: Interorganizational relationships (IORs) between child welfare agencies and mental health service providers may facilitate mental health treatment access for vulnerable children. This study investigates whether IORs are associated with greater use of mental health services and improvement in mental health status for children served by the child welfare system. Methods: This was a longitudinal analysis of data from a 36-month period in the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW). The sample consisted of 1,613 children within 75 child welfare agencies who were 2 years or older and had mental health problems at baseline. IOR intensity was measured as the number of coordination approaches between each child welfare agency and mental health service providers. Separate weighted multilevel logistic regression models tested associations between IORs and service use and outcomes, respectively. Results: Agency-level factors accounted for 9% of the variance in the probability of service use and 12% of mental health improvement. Greater intensity of IORs was associated with higher likelihood of both service use and mental health improvement. Conclusions: Having greater numbers of ties with mental health providers may help child welfare agencies improve children's mental health service access and outcomes. Practice implications: Policymakers should develop policies and initiatives to encourage a combination of different types of organizational ties between child welfare and mental health systems. For instance, information sharing at the agency level in addition to coordination at the case level may improve the coordination necessary to serve these vulnerable children.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349242446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349242446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.10.004

DO - 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.10.004

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 372

EP - 381

JO - Child Abuse and Neglect

JF - Child Abuse and Neglect

SN - 0145-2134

IS - 6

ER -