Corn grain drying using corn stover combustion and CHP systems

Albert S. Bennett, Carl J. Bern, Thomas Lehman Richard, Robert P. Anex

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Post-harvest drying of shelled corn grain requires large amounts of fossil fuel energy. In 2004, it was estimated that the upper Midwest consumed more than $1.4 billion of fossil fuels to dry $19.7 billion of corn grain. Over the long term, drying corn with fossil fuels may become cost prohibitive due to limited fuel reserves. To address future energy concerns for grain dryers, this study evaluated the potential use of combined heat and power (CHP) systems that use the combustion of corn stover both to produce heat for drying and to generate electricity for fans, augers, and control components. Net present value (NPV) cost estimates were determined for two continuous-flow dryers: a relatively small on-farm dryer (8.9 Mg h -1), and a larger dryer more common to grain elevators (73 Mg h -1). For each dryer, three levels of assumed stover price were used: $15, $25, and $35 per dry Mg for the small dryer, and $30, $45, and $60 per dry Mg for the larger dryer (includes payments to farmer and off-farm transport costs). Compared to equivalently sized fossil fuel-fired dryers, both the small and large CHP dryers were found to be more economical over the long term. Twenty-year NPV cost savings and breakeven points were estimated to be $63,523 and 14.3 years for the small CHP dryer ($25 Mg -1 stover) and $1,804,482 and 7.5 years for the large dryer ($45 Mg -1 stover). Sharing CHP infrastructure with other processes requiring heat that extend seasonal use can reduce payback periods significantly and provide broader efficiency benefits. Sensitivity analysis found cost savings to be most sensitive to fluctuations in fossil fuel costs, followed by annual use of dryer equipment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2161-2170
Number of pages10
JournalTransactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers
Volume50
Issue number6
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint

combined heat and power
Fossil Fuels
corn stover
dryers
combustion
fossil fuel
Zea mays
Drying
Fossil fuels
Hot Temperature
drying
maize
heat
corn
fossil fuels
cost
Costs
Costs and Cost Analysis
Cost Savings
savings

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Food Science
  • Forestry
  • Soil Science

Cite this

Bennett, Albert S. ; Bern, Carl J. ; Richard, Thomas Lehman ; Anex, Robert P. / Corn grain drying using corn stover combustion and CHP systems. In: Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 2007 ; Vol. 50, No. 6. pp. 2161-2170.
@article{16edd711daea422f954015554ec8456f,
title = "Corn grain drying using corn stover combustion and CHP systems",
abstract = "Post-harvest drying of shelled corn grain requires large amounts of fossil fuel energy. In 2004, it was estimated that the upper Midwest consumed more than $1.4 billion of fossil fuels to dry $19.7 billion of corn grain. Over the long term, drying corn with fossil fuels may become cost prohibitive due to limited fuel reserves. To address future energy concerns for grain dryers, this study evaluated the potential use of combined heat and power (CHP) systems that use the combustion of corn stover both to produce heat for drying and to generate electricity for fans, augers, and control components. Net present value (NPV) cost estimates were determined for two continuous-flow dryers: a relatively small on-farm dryer (8.9 Mg h -1), and a larger dryer more common to grain elevators (73 Mg h -1). For each dryer, three levels of assumed stover price were used: $15, $25, and $35 per dry Mg for the small dryer, and $30, $45, and $60 per dry Mg for the larger dryer (includes payments to farmer and off-farm transport costs). Compared to equivalently sized fossil fuel-fired dryers, both the small and large CHP dryers were found to be more economical over the long term. Twenty-year NPV cost savings and breakeven points were estimated to be $63,523 and 14.3 years for the small CHP dryer ($25 Mg -1 stover) and $1,804,482 and 7.5 years for the large dryer ($45 Mg -1 stover). Sharing CHP infrastructure with other processes requiring heat that extend seasonal use can reduce payback periods significantly and provide broader efficiency benefits. Sensitivity analysis found cost savings to be most sensitive to fluctuations in fossil fuel costs, followed by annual use of dryer equipment.",
author = "Bennett, {Albert S.} and Bern, {Carl J.} and Richard, {Thomas Lehman} and Anex, {Robert P.}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "2161--2170",
journal = "Transactions of the ASABE",
issn = "2151-0032",
publisher = "American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers",
number = "6",

}

Corn grain drying using corn stover combustion and CHP systems. / Bennett, Albert S.; Bern, Carl J.; Richard, Thomas Lehman; Anex, Robert P.

In: Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Vol. 50, No. 6, 11.2007, p. 2161-2170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corn grain drying using corn stover combustion and CHP systems

AU - Bennett, Albert S.

AU - Bern, Carl J.

AU - Richard, Thomas Lehman

AU - Anex, Robert P.

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Post-harvest drying of shelled corn grain requires large amounts of fossil fuel energy. In 2004, it was estimated that the upper Midwest consumed more than $1.4 billion of fossil fuels to dry $19.7 billion of corn grain. Over the long term, drying corn with fossil fuels may become cost prohibitive due to limited fuel reserves. To address future energy concerns for grain dryers, this study evaluated the potential use of combined heat and power (CHP) systems that use the combustion of corn stover both to produce heat for drying and to generate electricity for fans, augers, and control components. Net present value (NPV) cost estimates were determined for two continuous-flow dryers: a relatively small on-farm dryer (8.9 Mg h -1), and a larger dryer more common to grain elevators (73 Mg h -1). For each dryer, three levels of assumed stover price were used: $15, $25, and $35 per dry Mg for the small dryer, and $30, $45, and $60 per dry Mg for the larger dryer (includes payments to farmer and off-farm transport costs). Compared to equivalently sized fossil fuel-fired dryers, both the small and large CHP dryers were found to be more economical over the long term. Twenty-year NPV cost savings and breakeven points were estimated to be $63,523 and 14.3 years for the small CHP dryer ($25 Mg -1 stover) and $1,804,482 and 7.5 years for the large dryer ($45 Mg -1 stover). Sharing CHP infrastructure with other processes requiring heat that extend seasonal use can reduce payback periods significantly and provide broader efficiency benefits. Sensitivity analysis found cost savings to be most sensitive to fluctuations in fossil fuel costs, followed by annual use of dryer equipment.

AB - Post-harvest drying of shelled corn grain requires large amounts of fossil fuel energy. In 2004, it was estimated that the upper Midwest consumed more than $1.4 billion of fossil fuels to dry $19.7 billion of corn grain. Over the long term, drying corn with fossil fuels may become cost prohibitive due to limited fuel reserves. To address future energy concerns for grain dryers, this study evaluated the potential use of combined heat and power (CHP) systems that use the combustion of corn stover both to produce heat for drying and to generate electricity for fans, augers, and control components. Net present value (NPV) cost estimates were determined for two continuous-flow dryers: a relatively small on-farm dryer (8.9 Mg h -1), and a larger dryer more common to grain elevators (73 Mg h -1). For each dryer, three levels of assumed stover price were used: $15, $25, and $35 per dry Mg for the small dryer, and $30, $45, and $60 per dry Mg for the larger dryer (includes payments to farmer and off-farm transport costs). Compared to equivalently sized fossil fuel-fired dryers, both the small and large CHP dryers were found to be more economical over the long term. Twenty-year NPV cost savings and breakeven points were estimated to be $63,523 and 14.3 years for the small CHP dryer ($25 Mg -1 stover) and $1,804,482 and 7.5 years for the large dryer ($45 Mg -1 stover). Sharing CHP infrastructure with other processes requiring heat that extend seasonal use can reduce payback periods significantly and provide broader efficiency benefits. Sensitivity analysis found cost savings to be most sensitive to fluctuations in fossil fuel costs, followed by annual use of dryer equipment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38549137378&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38549137378&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38549137378

VL - 50

SP - 2161

EP - 2170

JO - Transactions of the ASABE

JF - Transactions of the ASABE

SN - 2151-0032

IS - 6

ER -