Corporate diversification

Can the observed diversification discount shed light on management’s choice to diversify or re-focus?

Garrett C.C. Smith, Jeffrey Michael Coy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare two theories that relate the proportion of diversified firms in the economy and the implied discount for diversified firms: the first is a real-options model predicting a positive relationship between the discount and management’s choice to operate a diversified firm; the second is based on catering theory, in which a negative relationship is predicted, as management is attentive to investor preference concerning diversified firms. Design/methodology/approach: This study proposes a new aggregate measure of the diversification discount. The authors’ measure allows for decomposition of the discount into firm-level mispricing, industry-level mispricing and long-run fundamental value components. Findings: Results support a catering theory of diversification. The discount appears to be the result of firm-level mispricing. Thus, providing an explanation for why, in light of the observed discount, a large number of diversified firms persist. Originality/value: To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to provide evidence that firm-level mispricing may drive the observed diversification discount.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)405-424
Number of pages20
JournalReview of Accounting and Finance
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 13 2018

Fingerprint

Diversification discount
Discount
Corporate diversification
Diversified firms
Mispricing
Design methodology
Fundamental values
Industry
Investors
Decomposition
Real options
Proportion
Diversification

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

@article{d843025cefad4831bef09eaa793ec8f0,
title = "Corporate diversification: Can the observed diversification discount shed light on management’s choice to diversify or re-focus?",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare two theories that relate the proportion of diversified firms in the economy and the implied discount for diversified firms: the first is a real-options model predicting a positive relationship between the discount and management’s choice to operate a diversified firm; the second is based on catering theory, in which a negative relationship is predicted, as management is attentive to investor preference concerning diversified firms. Design/methodology/approach: This study proposes a new aggregate measure of the diversification discount. The authors’ measure allows for decomposition of the discount into firm-level mispricing, industry-level mispricing and long-run fundamental value components. Findings: Results support a catering theory of diversification. The discount appears to be the result of firm-level mispricing. Thus, providing an explanation for why, in light of the observed discount, a large number of diversified firms persist. Originality/value: To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to provide evidence that firm-level mispricing may drive the observed diversification discount.",
author = "Smith, {Garrett C.C.} and Coy, {Jeffrey Michael}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1108/RAF-11-2016-0172",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "405--424",
journal = "Review of Accounting and Finance",
issn = "1475-7702",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corporate diversification

T2 - Can the observed diversification discount shed light on management’s choice to diversify or re-focus?

AU - Smith, Garrett C.C.

AU - Coy, Jeffrey Michael

PY - 2018/8/13

Y1 - 2018/8/13

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare two theories that relate the proportion of diversified firms in the economy and the implied discount for diversified firms: the first is a real-options model predicting a positive relationship between the discount and management’s choice to operate a diversified firm; the second is based on catering theory, in which a negative relationship is predicted, as management is attentive to investor preference concerning diversified firms. Design/methodology/approach: This study proposes a new aggregate measure of the diversification discount. The authors’ measure allows for decomposition of the discount into firm-level mispricing, industry-level mispricing and long-run fundamental value components. Findings: Results support a catering theory of diversification. The discount appears to be the result of firm-level mispricing. Thus, providing an explanation for why, in light of the observed discount, a large number of diversified firms persist. Originality/value: To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to provide evidence that firm-level mispricing may drive the observed diversification discount.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare two theories that relate the proportion of diversified firms in the economy and the implied discount for diversified firms: the first is a real-options model predicting a positive relationship between the discount and management’s choice to operate a diversified firm; the second is based on catering theory, in which a negative relationship is predicted, as management is attentive to investor preference concerning diversified firms. Design/methodology/approach: This study proposes a new aggregate measure of the diversification discount. The authors’ measure allows for decomposition of the discount into firm-level mispricing, industry-level mispricing and long-run fundamental value components. Findings: Results support a catering theory of diversification. The discount appears to be the result of firm-level mispricing. Thus, providing an explanation for why, in light of the observed discount, a large number of diversified firms persist. Originality/value: To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to provide evidence that firm-level mispricing may drive the observed diversification discount.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052072407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052072407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/RAF-11-2016-0172

DO - 10.1108/RAF-11-2016-0172

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 405

EP - 424

JO - Review of Accounting and Finance

JF - Review of Accounting and Finance

SN - 1475-7702

IS - 3

ER -