Correlation of clinical and pathological staging and response to neoadjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic cancer

Katelin A. Mirkin, Erin K. Greenleaf, Christopher S. Hollenbeak, Joyce Wong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has been increasingly employed to optimize outcomes in pancreatic cancer; however, little is known about its pathologic impact. Methods: The National Cancer Data Base (2003–2011) was retrospectively reviewed for patients with pancreatic carcinoma who underwent initial surgery or NAT followed by resection. Response to NAT, determined by comparing clinical and pathologic stage, and survival were evaluated. Results: 16,087 patients underwent initial pancreatectomy and 2307 patients received NAT. Clinical stage correlated poorly with pathological stage in patients who received initial surgery (κ = 0.2865, p < 0.001). With NAT, 21.9% were downstaged, 47.9% had no stage change, and 30.3% progressed. In clinical stage II disease, patients downstaged with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or multimodality therapy demonstrated improved survival over patients who did not respond or who progressed (P = 0.0022, P = 0.0012, respectively). This benefit was not preserved in stage III disease (P = 0.7380, P = 0.0726, respectively). In multivariable analysis, downstage in disease was associated with a 19% lower hazard of mortality (HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.7–0.92, P = 0.002). Conclusions: Clinical stage correlates poorly with pathological stage in resectable pancreatic cancer. The majority of patients do not experience a change in stage with NAT. Those with early stage disease, responsive to NAT, experience a survival benefit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)221-228
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Surgery
Volume52
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2018

Fingerprint

Neoadjuvant Therapy
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Survival
Pancreatectomy
Databases
Drug Therapy
Mortality

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

@article{33911b820e6d4df798faf73d1e1e9e16,
title = "Correlation of clinical and pathological staging and response to neoadjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic cancer",
abstract = "Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has been increasingly employed to optimize outcomes in pancreatic cancer; however, little is known about its pathologic impact. Methods: The National Cancer Data Base (2003–2011) was retrospectively reviewed for patients with pancreatic carcinoma who underwent initial surgery or NAT followed by resection. Response to NAT, determined by comparing clinical and pathologic stage, and survival were evaluated. Results: 16,087 patients underwent initial pancreatectomy and 2307 patients received NAT. Clinical stage correlated poorly with pathological stage in patients who received initial surgery (κ = 0.2865, p < 0.001). With NAT, 21.9{\%} were downstaged, 47.9{\%} had no stage change, and 30.3{\%} progressed. In clinical stage II disease, patients downstaged with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or multimodality therapy demonstrated improved survival over patients who did not respond or who progressed (P = 0.0022, P = 0.0012, respectively). This benefit was not preserved in stage III disease (P = 0.7380, P = 0.0726, respectively). In multivariable analysis, downstage in disease was associated with a 19{\%} lower hazard of mortality (HR 0.81, 95{\%} CI: 0.7–0.92, P = 0.002). Conclusions: Clinical stage correlates poorly with pathological stage in resectable pancreatic cancer. The majority of patients do not experience a change in stage with NAT. Those with early stage disease, responsive to NAT, experience a survival benefit.",
author = "Mirkin, {Katelin A.} and Greenleaf, {Erin K.} and Hollenbeak, {Christopher S.} and Joyce Wong",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.043",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "221--228",
journal = "International Journal of Surgery",
issn = "1743-9191",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Correlation of clinical and pathological staging and response to neoadjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic cancer. / Mirkin, Katelin A.; Greenleaf, Erin K.; Hollenbeak, Christopher S.; Wong, Joyce.

In: International Journal of Surgery, Vol. 52, 04.2018, p. 221-228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correlation of clinical and pathological staging and response to neoadjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic cancer

AU - Mirkin, Katelin A.

AU - Greenleaf, Erin K.

AU - Hollenbeak, Christopher S.

AU - Wong, Joyce

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has been increasingly employed to optimize outcomes in pancreatic cancer; however, little is known about its pathologic impact. Methods: The National Cancer Data Base (2003–2011) was retrospectively reviewed for patients with pancreatic carcinoma who underwent initial surgery or NAT followed by resection. Response to NAT, determined by comparing clinical and pathologic stage, and survival were evaluated. Results: 16,087 patients underwent initial pancreatectomy and 2307 patients received NAT. Clinical stage correlated poorly with pathological stage in patients who received initial surgery (κ = 0.2865, p < 0.001). With NAT, 21.9% were downstaged, 47.9% had no stage change, and 30.3% progressed. In clinical stage II disease, patients downstaged with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or multimodality therapy demonstrated improved survival over patients who did not respond or who progressed (P = 0.0022, P = 0.0012, respectively). This benefit was not preserved in stage III disease (P = 0.7380, P = 0.0726, respectively). In multivariable analysis, downstage in disease was associated with a 19% lower hazard of mortality (HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.7–0.92, P = 0.002). Conclusions: Clinical stage correlates poorly with pathological stage in resectable pancreatic cancer. The majority of patients do not experience a change in stage with NAT. Those with early stage disease, responsive to NAT, experience a survival benefit.

AB - Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has been increasingly employed to optimize outcomes in pancreatic cancer; however, little is known about its pathologic impact. Methods: The National Cancer Data Base (2003–2011) was retrospectively reviewed for patients with pancreatic carcinoma who underwent initial surgery or NAT followed by resection. Response to NAT, determined by comparing clinical and pathologic stage, and survival were evaluated. Results: 16,087 patients underwent initial pancreatectomy and 2307 patients received NAT. Clinical stage correlated poorly with pathological stage in patients who received initial surgery (κ = 0.2865, p < 0.001). With NAT, 21.9% were downstaged, 47.9% had no stage change, and 30.3% progressed. In clinical stage II disease, patients downstaged with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or multimodality therapy demonstrated improved survival over patients who did not respond or who progressed (P = 0.0022, P = 0.0012, respectively). This benefit was not preserved in stage III disease (P = 0.7380, P = 0.0726, respectively). In multivariable analysis, downstage in disease was associated with a 19% lower hazard of mortality (HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.7–0.92, P = 0.002). Conclusions: Clinical stage correlates poorly with pathological stage in resectable pancreatic cancer. The majority of patients do not experience a change in stage with NAT. Those with early stage disease, responsive to NAT, experience a survival benefit.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042779733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042779733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.043

DO - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.043

M3 - Article

C2 - 29425826

AN - SCOPUS:85042779733

VL - 52

SP - 221

EP - 228

JO - International Journal of Surgery

JF - International Journal of Surgery

SN - 1743-9191

ER -