Abstract
The authors noticed an error in the computation of the w effect size in the modeling analyses. Corrected values of w are reported with initial values in parentheses: In Section 2.2.2, w's are 0.01 (0.03), 0.24 (0.48), 0.01 (0.02), and 0.02 (0.04). In Section 3.2.2, w's are 0.15 (0.45), 0.01 (0.02), and 0.02 (0.06). In Section 4.2.2, w's are 0.02 (0.08), 0.02 (0.06), 0.00 (0.01), 0.01 (0.04), 0.02 (0.05), and 0.03 (0.10). In Section 5.2.2, w's are 0.00 (0.00) and 0.03 (0.06). In Section 6.2.2, w's are 0.03 (0.05), 0.00 (0.01), 0.01 (0.01), 0.00 (0.00), 0.05 (0.08), 0.05 (0.08), 0.00 (0.00), 0.03 (0.06). In Table 2, w's are 0.24 (0.48), 0.01 (0.02), and 0.02 (0.04). In Tables 4 and 6, w's are 0.02 (0.06). In Table 8, w is 0.03 (0.06). In Table 10, w's for voter group comparisons are 0.04 (0.06) and 0.03 (0.06) and for prime comparisons are 0.00 (0.00) and 0.00 (0.00). This error does not change any results or interpretations about model fit based upon the Gsquared statistic, or about significant differences across conditions in process parameters. Therefore, it does not change any of the hypothesis tests or conclusions. Additionally, the authors noticed minor input typos in Table 5. Corrected values for primetarget descriptive statistics are reported, with initial values in parentheses: WrongIdiographic M is 0.14 (0.15), WrongNeutral SD is 0.24 (0.23), IdiographicWrong SD is 0.16 (0.17), IdiographicNeutral SD is 0.23 (0.22), NegativeIdiographic M is 0.16 (0.17), NegativeNegative SD is 0.25 (0.26), NegativeNeutral M is 0.46 (0.45), NeutralWrong M is 0.22 (0.23), and NeutralNegative M is 0.60 (0.59). These were table input errors that do not impact the ANOVAs or Hedges’ g effect size computations, and thus do not change any conclusions about the behavioral results. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Original language  English (US) 

Number of pages  1 
Journal  Cognition 
Volume  173 
DOIs 

State  Published  Apr 1 2018 
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
 Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
 Language and Linguistics
 Developmental and Educational Psychology
 Linguistics and Language
 Cognitive Neuroscience
Cite this
}
Corrigendum to “Implicit moral evaluations : A multinomial modeling approach” [Cognition 158 (2017) 224–241] (S0010027716302530) (10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.013)). / Cameron, Christopher Daryl; Payne, B. Keith; SinnottArmstrong, Walter; Scheffer, Julian A.; Inzlicht, Michael.
In: Cognition, Vol. 173, 01.04.2018.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate
TY  JOUR
T1  Corrigendum to “Implicit moral evaluations
T2  A multinomial modeling approach” [Cognition 158 (2017) 224–241] (S0010027716302530) (10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.013))
AU  Cameron, Christopher Daryl
AU  Payne, B. Keith
AU  SinnottArmstrong, Walter
AU  Scheffer, Julian A.
AU  Inzlicht, Michael
PY  2018/4/1
Y1  2018/4/1
N2  The authors noticed an error in the computation of the w effect size in the modeling analyses. Corrected values of w are reported with initial values in parentheses: In Section 2.2.2, w's are 0.01 (0.03), 0.24 (0.48), 0.01 (0.02), and 0.02 (0.04). In Section 3.2.2, w's are 0.15 (0.45), 0.01 (0.02), and 0.02 (0.06). In Section 4.2.2, w's are 0.02 (0.08), 0.02 (0.06), 0.00 (0.01), 0.01 (0.04), 0.02 (0.05), and 0.03 (0.10). In Section 5.2.2, w's are 0.00 (0.00) and 0.03 (0.06). In Section 6.2.2, w's are 0.03 (0.05), 0.00 (0.01), 0.01 (0.01), 0.00 (0.00), 0.05 (0.08), 0.05 (0.08), 0.00 (0.00), 0.03 (0.06). In Table 2, w's are 0.24 (0.48), 0.01 (0.02), and 0.02 (0.04). In Tables 4 and 6, w's are 0.02 (0.06). In Table 8, w is 0.03 (0.06). In Table 10, w's for voter group comparisons are 0.04 (0.06) and 0.03 (0.06) and for prime comparisons are 0.00 (0.00) and 0.00 (0.00). This error does not change any results or interpretations about model fit based upon the Gsquared statistic, or about significant differences across conditions in process parameters. Therefore, it does not change any of the hypothesis tests or conclusions. Additionally, the authors noticed minor input typos in Table 5. Corrected values for primetarget descriptive statistics are reported, with initial values in parentheses: WrongIdiographic M is 0.14 (0.15), WrongNeutral SD is 0.24 (0.23), IdiographicWrong SD is 0.16 (0.17), IdiographicNeutral SD is 0.23 (0.22), NegativeIdiographic M is 0.16 (0.17), NegativeNegative SD is 0.25 (0.26), NegativeNeutral M is 0.46 (0.45), NeutralWrong M is 0.22 (0.23), and NeutralNegative M is 0.60 (0.59). These were table input errors that do not impact the ANOVAs or Hedges’ g effect size computations, and thus do not change any conclusions about the behavioral results. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
AB  The authors noticed an error in the computation of the w effect size in the modeling analyses. Corrected values of w are reported with initial values in parentheses: In Section 2.2.2, w's are 0.01 (0.03), 0.24 (0.48), 0.01 (0.02), and 0.02 (0.04). In Section 3.2.2, w's are 0.15 (0.45), 0.01 (0.02), and 0.02 (0.06). In Section 4.2.2, w's are 0.02 (0.08), 0.02 (0.06), 0.00 (0.01), 0.01 (0.04), 0.02 (0.05), and 0.03 (0.10). In Section 5.2.2, w's are 0.00 (0.00) and 0.03 (0.06). In Section 6.2.2, w's are 0.03 (0.05), 0.00 (0.01), 0.01 (0.01), 0.00 (0.00), 0.05 (0.08), 0.05 (0.08), 0.00 (0.00), 0.03 (0.06). In Table 2, w's are 0.24 (0.48), 0.01 (0.02), and 0.02 (0.04). In Tables 4 and 6, w's are 0.02 (0.06). In Table 8, w is 0.03 (0.06). In Table 10, w's for voter group comparisons are 0.04 (0.06) and 0.03 (0.06) and for prime comparisons are 0.00 (0.00) and 0.00 (0.00). This error does not change any results or interpretations about model fit based upon the Gsquared statistic, or about significant differences across conditions in process parameters. Therefore, it does not change any of the hypothesis tests or conclusions. Additionally, the authors noticed minor input typos in Table 5. Corrected values for primetarget descriptive statistics are reported, with initial values in parentheses: WrongIdiographic M is 0.14 (0.15), WrongNeutral SD is 0.24 (0.23), IdiographicWrong SD is 0.16 (0.17), IdiographicNeutral SD is 0.23 (0.22), NegativeIdiographic M is 0.16 (0.17), NegativeNegative SD is 0.25 (0.26), NegativeNeutral M is 0.46 (0.45), NeutralWrong M is 0.22 (0.23), and NeutralNegative M is 0.60 (0.59). These were table input errors that do not impact the ANOVAs or Hedges’ g effect size computations, and thus do not change any conclusions about the behavioral results. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
UR  http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039899207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR  http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039899207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2  10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.012
DO  10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.012
M3  Comment/debate
C2  29307438
AN  SCOPUS:85039899207
VL  173
JO  Cognition
JF  Cognition
SN  00100277
ER 