Corrigendum to “Renal function and isomers of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS): Isomers of C8 health project in China” (Chemosphere (2019) 218 (1042–1049), (S0045653518322987) (10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.191))

Jia Wang; Xiao Wen Zeng; Michael S. Bloom; Zhengmin Qian; Leslie J. Hinyard; Rhonda Belue; Shao Lin; Si Quan Wang; Yan Peng Tian; Mo Yang; Chu Chu; Namratha Gurram; Li Wen Hu; Kang Kang Liu; Bo Yi Yang; Dan Feng; Ru Qing Liu; Guang Hui Dong

doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.051

Corrigendum to “Renal function and isomers of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS): Isomers of C8 health project in China” (Chemosphere (2019) 218 (1042–1049), (S0045653518322987) (10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.191))

Jia Wang, Xiao Wen Zeng, Michael S. Bloom, Zhengmin Qian, Leslie J. Hinyard, Rhonda Belue, Shao Lin, Si Quan Wang, Yan Peng Tian, Mo Yang, Chu Chu, Namratha Gurram, Li Wen Hu, Kang Kang Liu, Bo Yi Yang, Dan Feng, Ru Qing Liu, Guang Hui Dong

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

The authors regret. 1. Abstract: “Compared with linear PFOS (n-PFOS), branched PFOS isomers (Br-PFOS) were more strongly associated with eGFR (Br-PFOS; β = −1.22, 95%CI: 2.02, −0.42; p = 0.003 vs. n-PFOS; β = −0.16, 95%CI: 0.98, 0.65; p = 0.691) and CKD (Br-PFOS; OR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.58; p = 0.037 vs. n-PFOS; OR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.80, 1.20; p = 0.834).”The data “2.02” “0.98” should be “−2.02” “−0.98” respectively. 2. Results, paragraph 2: “For example, a ln-unit higher of n-PFOS was associated with a mean lower eGFR of −0.16 mL/min/1.73m² (95% CI: 0.98, 0.65; p = 0.691) and a ln-unit higher of Br-PFOS was associated with a mean lower eGFR of −1.22 mL/min/1.73m² (95% CI: 2.02, −0.42; p = 0.003).”The data “2.02” “0.98” should be “−2.02” “−0.98” respectively. 3. Results, paragraph 4: “… except for an attenuated and non-significant effect estimate for PFOA association (β = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.52, 1.61; p = 0.316), …”The data “0.52” should be “−0.52”. 4. Discussion, paragraph 2: “They found higher serum PFOA and PFOS levels were negatively associated with eGFR levels (Q4 v. Q1: PFOA (β = −5.7, 95%CI: 7.9, −3.5; p for trend <0.0001), PFOS (β = −6.7, 95%CI: 8.9, −4.4; p for trend <0.0001)), …”The data “7.9” “8.9” should be “−7.9” “−8.9” respectively. 5. Discussion, paragraph 2: “ … and with no associations for PFNA and PFHxS (Q4 v. Q1: PFOA (β = −6.84 mL/min/1.73m²; 95%CI: 11.48, −2.19), PFOS (β = −9.69 mL/min/1.73m²; 95% CI: 14.78, −4.59).”The data “11.48” “14.78” should be “−11.48” “−14.78” respectively. 6. Discussion, paragraph 5: “In another recent birth cohort study in Guangzhou, China (n = 321), Li et al. (2017) reported stronger negative effects for branched PFOS isomers (β = −126.3 g; 95%CI: 195.9, −56.8) than linear PFOS (β = −57.2 g; 95%CI: 103.1, −11.3) on birth weight.”The data “195.9” “103.1” should be “−195.9” “−103.1” respectively.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1208
Number of pages	1
Journal	Chemosphere
Volume	220
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.051
State	Published - Apr 2019

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Environmental Engineering
Environmental Chemistry
Chemistry(all)
Pollution
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Access to Document

10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.051

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Renal function and isomers of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS): Isomers of C8 health project in China” (Chemosphere (2019) 218 (1042–1049), (S0045653518322987) (10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.191))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Wang, J., Zeng, X. W., Bloom, M. S., Qian, Z., Hinyard, L. J., Belue, R., Lin, S., Wang, S. Q., Tian, Y. P., Yang, M., Chu, C., Gurram, N., Hu, L. W., Liu, K. K., Yang, B. Y., Feng, D., Liu, R. Q., & Dong, G. H. (2019). Corrigendum to “Renal function and isomers of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS): Isomers of C8 health project in China” (Chemosphere (2019) 218 (1042–1049), (S0045653518322987) (10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.191)). Chemosphere, 220, 1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.051

@article{ea55b796cba64543a48cfb75d8ccb93b,

title = "Corrigendum to “Renal function and isomers of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS): Isomers of C8 health project in China” (Chemosphere (2019) 218 (1042–1049), (S0045653518322987) (10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.191))",

abstract = "The authors regret. 1. Abstract: “Compared with linear PFOS (n-PFOS), branched PFOS isomers (Br-PFOS) were more strongly associated with eGFR (Br-PFOS; β = −1.22, 95%CI: 2.02, −0.42; p = 0.003 vs. n-PFOS; β = −0.16, 95%CI: 0.98, 0.65; p = 0.691) and CKD (Br-PFOS; OR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.58; p = 0.037 vs. n-PFOS; OR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.80, 1.20; p = 0.834).”The data “2.02” “0.98” should be “−2.02” “−0.98” respectively. 2. Results, paragraph 2: “For example, a ln-unit higher of n-PFOS was associated with a mean lower eGFR of −0.16 mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI: 0.98, 0.65; p = 0.691) and a ln-unit higher of Br-PFOS was associated with a mean lower eGFR of −1.22 mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI: 2.02, −0.42; p = 0.003).”The data “2.02” “0.98” should be “−2.02” “−0.98” respectively. 3. Results, paragraph 4: “… except for an attenuated and non-significant effect estimate for PFOA association (β = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.52, 1.61; p = 0.316), …”The data “0.52” should be “−0.52”. 4. Discussion, paragraph 2: “They found higher serum PFOA and PFOS levels were negatively associated with eGFR levels (Q4 v. Q1: PFOA (β = −5.7, 95%CI: 7.9, −3.5; p for trend <0.0001), PFOS (β = −6.7, 95%CI: 8.9, −4.4; p for trend <0.0001)), …”The data “7.9” “8.9” should be “−7.9” “−8.9” respectively. 5. Discussion, paragraph 2: “ … and with no associations for PFNA and PFHxS (Q4 v. Q1: PFOA (β = −6.84 mL/min/1.73m2; 95%CI: 11.48, −2.19), PFOS (β = −9.69 mL/min/1.73m2; 95% CI: 14.78, −4.59).”The data “11.48” “14.78” should be “−11.48” “−14.78” respectively. 6. Discussion, paragraph 5: “In another recent birth cohort study in Guangzhou, China (n = 321), Li et al. (2017) reported stronger negative effects for branched PFOS isomers (β = −126.3 g; 95%CI: 195.9, −56.8) than linear PFOS (β = −57.2 g; 95%CI: 103.1, −11.3) on birth weight.”The data “195.9” “103.1” should be “−195.9” “−103.1” respectively.",

author = "Jia Wang and Zeng, {Xiao Wen} and Bloom, {Michael S.} and Zhengmin Qian and Hinyard, {Leslie J.} and Rhonda Belue and Shao Lin and Wang, {Si Quan} and Tian, {Yan Peng} and Mo Yang and Chu Chu and Namratha Gurram and Hu, {Li Wen} and Liu, {Kang Kang} and Yang, {Bo Yi} and Dan Feng and Liu, {Ru Qing} and Dong, {Guang Hui}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Elsevier Ltd",

year = "2019",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.051",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "220",

pages = "1208",

journal = "Chemosphere",

issn = "0045-6535",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Wang, J, Zeng, XW, Bloom, MS, Qian, Z, Hinyard, LJ, Belue, R, Lin, S, Wang, SQ, Tian, YP, Yang, M, Chu, C, Gurram, N, Hu, LW, Liu, KK, Yang, BY, Feng, D, Liu, RQ & Dong, GH 2019, 'Corrigendum to “Renal function and isomers of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS): Isomers of C8 health project in China” (Chemosphere (2019) 218 (1042–1049), (S0045653518322987) (10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.191))', Chemosphere, vol. 220, pp. 1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.051

Corrigendum to “Renal function and isomers of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS): Isomers of C8 health project in China” (Chemosphere (2019) 218 (1042–1049), (S0045653518322987) (10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.191)). / Wang, Jia; Zeng, Xiao Wen; Bloom, Michael S. et al.
In: Chemosphere, Vol. 220, 04.2019, p. 1208.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum to “Renal function and isomers of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS)

T2 - Isomers of C8 health project in China” (Chemosphere (2019) 218 (1042–1049), (S0045653518322987) (10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.191))

AU - Wang, Jia

AU - Zeng, Xiao Wen

AU - Bloom, Michael S.

AU - Qian, Zhengmin

AU - Hinyard, Leslie J.

AU - Belue, Rhonda

AU - Lin, Shao

AU - Wang, Si Quan

AU - Tian, Yan Peng

AU - Yang, Mo

AU - Chu, Chu

AU - Gurram, Namratha

AU - Hu, Li Wen

AU - Liu, Kang Kang

AU - Yang, Bo Yi

AU - Feng, Dan

AU - Liu, Ru Qing

AU - Dong, Guang Hui

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - The authors regret. 1. Abstract: “Compared with linear PFOS (n-PFOS), branched PFOS isomers (Br-PFOS) were more strongly associated with eGFR (Br-PFOS; β = −1.22, 95%CI: 2.02, −0.42; p = 0.003 vs. n-PFOS; β = −0.16, 95%CI: 0.98, 0.65; p = 0.691) and CKD (Br-PFOS; OR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.58; p = 0.037 vs. n-PFOS; OR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.80, 1.20; p = 0.834).”The data “2.02” “0.98” should be “−2.02” “−0.98” respectively. 2. Results, paragraph 2: “For example, a ln-unit higher of n-PFOS was associated with a mean lower eGFR of −0.16 mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI: 0.98, 0.65; p = 0.691) and a ln-unit higher of Br-PFOS was associated with a mean lower eGFR of −1.22 mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI: 2.02, −0.42; p = 0.003).”The data “2.02” “0.98” should be “−2.02” “−0.98” respectively. 3. Results, paragraph 4: “… except for an attenuated and non-significant effect estimate for PFOA association (β = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.52, 1.61; p = 0.316), …”The data “0.52” should be “−0.52”. 4. Discussion, paragraph 2: “They found higher serum PFOA and PFOS levels were negatively associated with eGFR levels (Q4 v. Q1: PFOA (β = −5.7, 95%CI: 7.9, −3.5; p for trend <0.0001), PFOS (β = −6.7, 95%CI: 8.9, −4.4; p for trend <0.0001)), …”The data “7.9” “8.9” should be “−7.9” “−8.9” respectively. 5. Discussion, paragraph 2: “ … and with no associations for PFNA and PFHxS (Q4 v. Q1: PFOA (β = −6.84 mL/min/1.73m2; 95%CI: 11.48, −2.19), PFOS (β = −9.69 mL/min/1.73m2; 95% CI: 14.78, −4.59).”The data “11.48” “14.78” should be “−11.48” “−14.78” respectively. 6. Discussion, paragraph 5: “In another recent birth cohort study in Guangzhou, China (n = 321), Li et al. (2017) reported stronger negative effects for branched PFOS isomers (β = −126.3 g; 95%CI: 195.9, −56.8) than linear PFOS (β = −57.2 g; 95%CI: 103.1, −11.3) on birth weight.”The data “195.9” “103.1” should be “−195.9” “−103.1” respectively.

AB - The authors regret. 1. Abstract: “Compared with linear PFOS (n-PFOS), branched PFOS isomers (Br-PFOS) were more strongly associated with eGFR (Br-PFOS; β = −1.22, 95%CI: 2.02, −0.42; p = 0.003 vs. n-PFOS; β = −0.16, 95%CI: 0.98, 0.65; p = 0.691) and CKD (Br-PFOS; OR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.58; p = 0.037 vs. n-PFOS; OR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.80, 1.20; p = 0.834).”The data “2.02” “0.98” should be “−2.02” “−0.98” respectively. 2. Results, paragraph 2: “For example, a ln-unit higher of n-PFOS was associated with a mean lower eGFR of −0.16 mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI: 0.98, 0.65; p = 0.691) and a ln-unit higher of Br-PFOS was associated with a mean lower eGFR of −1.22 mL/min/1.73m2 (95% CI: 2.02, −0.42; p = 0.003).”The data “2.02” “0.98” should be “−2.02” “−0.98” respectively. 3. Results, paragraph 4: “… except for an attenuated and non-significant effect estimate for PFOA association (β = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.52, 1.61; p = 0.316), …”The data “0.52” should be “−0.52”. 4. Discussion, paragraph 2: “They found higher serum PFOA and PFOS levels were negatively associated with eGFR levels (Q4 v. Q1: PFOA (β = −5.7, 95%CI: 7.9, −3.5; p for trend <0.0001), PFOS (β = −6.7, 95%CI: 8.9, −4.4; p for trend <0.0001)), …”The data “7.9” “8.9” should be “−7.9” “−8.9” respectively. 5. Discussion, paragraph 2: “ … and with no associations for PFNA and PFHxS (Q4 v. Q1: PFOA (β = −6.84 mL/min/1.73m2; 95%CI: 11.48, −2.19), PFOS (β = −9.69 mL/min/1.73m2; 95% CI: 14.78, −4.59).”The data “11.48” “14.78” should be “−11.48” “−14.78” respectively. 6. Discussion, paragraph 5: “In another recent birth cohort study in Guangzhou, China (n = 321), Li et al. (2017) reported stronger negative effects for branched PFOS isomers (β = −126.3 g; 95%CI: 195.9, −56.8) than linear PFOS (β = −57.2 g; 95%CI: 103.1, −11.3) on birth weight.”The data “195.9” “103.1” should be “−195.9” “−103.1” respectively.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059956896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059956896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.051

DO - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.051

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 30660347

AN - SCOPUS:85059956896

SN - 0045-6535

VL - 220

SP - 1208

JO - Chemosphere

JF - Chemosphere

ER -

Wang J, Zeng XW, Bloom MS, Qian Z, Hinyard LJ, Belue R et al. Corrigendum to “Renal function and isomers of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS): Isomers of C8 health project in China” (Chemosphere (2019) 218 (1042–1049), (S0045653518322987) (10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.191)). Chemosphere. 2019 Apr;220:1208. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.051

Corrigendum to “Renal function and isomers of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS): Isomers of C8 health project in China” (Chemosphere (2019) 218 (1042–1049), (S0045653518322987) (10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.191))

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this