Cost-effectiveness analysis of the not on tobacco program for adolescent smoking cessation

Geri Dino, Kimberly Horn, Abdullahi Abdulkadri, Iftekhar Kalsekar, Steven A. Branstetter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Public health researchers and practitioners emphasize the need for effective, adoptable, and available youth smoking cessation interventions. Scarce resources demand that such interventions also be cost effective. This study describes a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the American Lung Association's Not On Tobacco (N-O-T) national and international teen smoking cessation program. N-O-T has been rigorously evaluated as an effective and adoptable program, and was recently found to be the most frequently-used teen smoking cessation program in the nation. N-O-T studies show intent-to-treat quit rates between 15% and 19%, among the highest reported in the literature. The current CEA resulted from a 2-year state-wide demonstration study in Florida, comparing the effectiveness of N-O-T with a 20-min brief intervention (BI). The CEA utilized a Markov transition model of decision analysis to explain stage progression of smoking cessation among participants from the age of 17 to 25 years. The Markov simulation predicted that out of a cohort of 100 N-O-T students, 10 will quit smoking and remain smoke-free at the age of 25 years and 14 will reduce smoking, resulting in 102.22 life years saved and a total of 20.11 years discounted life years (DLY) saved. Among BI youth, six will quit smoking and nine will reduce, indicating 64.31 life years saved and a total 12.65 DLY saved. The incremental DLY saved is 7.46 years. Results indicate that N-O-T is a very cost-effective option school-based smoking cessation, as cost effective as school-based primary tobacco prevention, and potentially more cost effective than adult tobacco use cessation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)38-46
Number of pages9
JournalPrevention Science
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2008

Fingerprint

Smoking Cessation
Tobacco
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Smoking
Tobacco Use Cessation
Decision Support Techniques
Primary Prevention
Smoke
Public Health
Research Personnel
Students
Lung

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Dino, Geri ; Horn, Kimberly ; Abdulkadri, Abdullahi ; Kalsekar, Iftekhar ; Branstetter, Steven A. / Cost-effectiveness analysis of the not on tobacco program for adolescent smoking cessation. In: Prevention Science. 2008 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 38-46.
@article{8f11480e37c1430aa0635a30830edb29,
title = "Cost-effectiveness analysis of the not on tobacco program for adolescent smoking cessation",
abstract = "Public health researchers and practitioners emphasize the need for effective, adoptable, and available youth smoking cessation interventions. Scarce resources demand that such interventions also be cost effective. This study describes a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the American Lung Association's Not On Tobacco (N-O-T) national and international teen smoking cessation program. N-O-T has been rigorously evaluated as an effective and adoptable program, and was recently found to be the most frequently-used teen smoking cessation program in the nation. N-O-T studies show intent-to-treat quit rates between 15{\%} and 19{\%}, among the highest reported in the literature. The current CEA resulted from a 2-year state-wide demonstration study in Florida, comparing the effectiveness of N-O-T with a 20-min brief intervention (BI). The CEA utilized a Markov transition model of decision analysis to explain stage progression of smoking cessation among participants from the age of 17 to 25 years. The Markov simulation predicted that out of a cohort of 100 N-O-T students, 10 will quit smoking and remain smoke-free at the age of 25 years and 14 will reduce smoking, resulting in 102.22 life years saved and a total of 20.11 years discounted life years (DLY) saved. Among BI youth, six will quit smoking and nine will reduce, indicating 64.31 life years saved and a total 12.65 DLY saved. The incremental DLY saved is 7.46 years. Results indicate that N-O-T is a very cost-effective option school-based smoking cessation, as cost effective as school-based primary tobacco prevention, and potentially more cost effective than adult tobacco use cessation.",
author = "Geri Dino and Kimberly Horn and Abdullahi Abdulkadri and Iftekhar Kalsekar and Branstetter, {Steven A.}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11121-008-0082-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "38--46",
journal = "Prevention Science",
issn = "1389-4986",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the not on tobacco program for adolescent smoking cessation. / Dino, Geri; Horn, Kimberly; Abdulkadri, Abdullahi; Kalsekar, Iftekhar; Branstetter, Steven A.

In: Prevention Science, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.03.2008, p. 38-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effectiveness analysis of the not on tobacco program for adolescent smoking cessation

AU - Dino, Geri

AU - Horn, Kimberly

AU - Abdulkadri, Abdullahi

AU - Kalsekar, Iftekhar

AU - Branstetter, Steven A.

PY - 2008/3/1

Y1 - 2008/3/1

N2 - Public health researchers and practitioners emphasize the need for effective, adoptable, and available youth smoking cessation interventions. Scarce resources demand that such interventions also be cost effective. This study describes a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the American Lung Association's Not On Tobacco (N-O-T) national and international teen smoking cessation program. N-O-T has been rigorously evaluated as an effective and adoptable program, and was recently found to be the most frequently-used teen smoking cessation program in the nation. N-O-T studies show intent-to-treat quit rates between 15% and 19%, among the highest reported in the literature. The current CEA resulted from a 2-year state-wide demonstration study in Florida, comparing the effectiveness of N-O-T with a 20-min brief intervention (BI). The CEA utilized a Markov transition model of decision analysis to explain stage progression of smoking cessation among participants from the age of 17 to 25 years. The Markov simulation predicted that out of a cohort of 100 N-O-T students, 10 will quit smoking and remain smoke-free at the age of 25 years and 14 will reduce smoking, resulting in 102.22 life years saved and a total of 20.11 years discounted life years (DLY) saved. Among BI youth, six will quit smoking and nine will reduce, indicating 64.31 life years saved and a total 12.65 DLY saved. The incremental DLY saved is 7.46 years. Results indicate that N-O-T is a very cost-effective option school-based smoking cessation, as cost effective as school-based primary tobacco prevention, and potentially more cost effective than adult tobacco use cessation.

AB - Public health researchers and practitioners emphasize the need for effective, adoptable, and available youth smoking cessation interventions. Scarce resources demand that such interventions also be cost effective. This study describes a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the American Lung Association's Not On Tobacco (N-O-T) national and international teen smoking cessation program. N-O-T has been rigorously evaluated as an effective and adoptable program, and was recently found to be the most frequently-used teen smoking cessation program in the nation. N-O-T studies show intent-to-treat quit rates between 15% and 19%, among the highest reported in the literature. The current CEA resulted from a 2-year state-wide demonstration study in Florida, comparing the effectiveness of N-O-T with a 20-min brief intervention (BI). The CEA utilized a Markov transition model of decision analysis to explain stage progression of smoking cessation among participants from the age of 17 to 25 years. The Markov simulation predicted that out of a cohort of 100 N-O-T students, 10 will quit smoking and remain smoke-free at the age of 25 years and 14 will reduce smoking, resulting in 102.22 life years saved and a total of 20.11 years discounted life years (DLY) saved. Among BI youth, six will quit smoking and nine will reduce, indicating 64.31 life years saved and a total 12.65 DLY saved. The incremental DLY saved is 7.46 years. Results indicate that N-O-T is a very cost-effective option school-based smoking cessation, as cost effective as school-based primary tobacco prevention, and potentially more cost effective than adult tobacco use cessation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41149160109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41149160109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11121-008-0082-0

DO - 10.1007/s11121-008-0082-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 18286372

AN - SCOPUS:41149160109

VL - 9

SP - 38

EP - 46

JO - Prevention Science

JF - Prevention Science

SN - 1389-4986

IS - 1

ER -