Cost of eating: Whole foods versus convenience foods in a low-income model

Andrew J. McDermott, Mark Stephens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Financial limitations in low-income populations, those at highest risk for poor health outcomes, may preclude adherence to recommended dietary guidelines. We examine the financial burden of shopping for foods to meet national dietary recommendations in a supermarket compared to eating primarily in a fast-food restaurant. Methods: Using a single-parent, low-income model, we obtained whole food costs (healthy) from local supermarkets and from fast-food outlets (convenient). Using cost per calorie as a metric for comparison, we used estimated single-parent, low-income living expenses to determine the relative costs of meeting national dietary guidelines. Results: Average food costs for healthy and convenience diets accounted for 18% and 37% of income, respectively. Dairy products and vegetables accounted for the largest cost percentages of diet costs (36% and 28%, respectively). The cost per calorie of a convenience diet was 24% higher than the healthy diet. Both models resulted in net financial loss over the course of a year for a single-parent, low-income family. Conclusions: Food costs represent a significant proportion of annual income. Diets based heavily on foods from convenient sources are less healthy and more expensive than a well-planned menu from budget foods available from large supermarket chains.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)280-284
Number of pages5
JournalFamily medicine
Volume42
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 1 2010

Fingerprint

Fast Foods
Eating
Costs and Cost Analysis
Food
Single Parent
Nutrition Policy
Diet
Restaurants
Dairy Products
Budgets
Poverty
Vegetables
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Family Practice

Cite this

@article{64bcf40b5d6f4d47a2840088d0087267,
title = "Cost of eating: Whole foods versus convenience foods in a low-income model",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: Financial limitations in low-income populations, those at highest risk for poor health outcomes, may preclude adherence to recommended dietary guidelines. We examine the financial burden of shopping for foods to meet national dietary recommendations in a supermarket compared to eating primarily in a fast-food restaurant. Methods: Using a single-parent, low-income model, we obtained whole food costs (healthy) from local supermarkets and from fast-food outlets (convenient). Using cost per calorie as a metric for comparison, we used estimated single-parent, low-income living expenses to determine the relative costs of meeting national dietary guidelines. Results: Average food costs for healthy and convenience diets accounted for 18{\%} and 37{\%} of income, respectively. Dairy products and vegetables accounted for the largest cost percentages of diet costs (36{\%} and 28{\%}, respectively). The cost per calorie of a convenience diet was 24{\%} higher than the healthy diet. Both models resulted in net financial loss over the course of a year for a single-parent, low-income family. Conclusions: Food costs represent a significant proportion of annual income. Diets based heavily on foods from convenient sources are less healthy and more expensive than a well-planned menu from budget foods available from large supermarket chains.",
author = "McDermott, {Andrew J.} and Mark Stephens",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "280--284",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "4",

}

Cost of eating : Whole foods versus convenience foods in a low-income model. / McDermott, Andrew J.; Stephens, Mark.

In: Family medicine, Vol. 42, No. 4, 01.04.2010, p. 280-284.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost of eating

T2 - Whole foods versus convenience foods in a low-income model

AU - McDermott, Andrew J.

AU - Stephens, Mark

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - Background and Objectives: Financial limitations in low-income populations, those at highest risk for poor health outcomes, may preclude adherence to recommended dietary guidelines. We examine the financial burden of shopping for foods to meet national dietary recommendations in a supermarket compared to eating primarily in a fast-food restaurant. Methods: Using a single-parent, low-income model, we obtained whole food costs (healthy) from local supermarkets and from fast-food outlets (convenient). Using cost per calorie as a metric for comparison, we used estimated single-parent, low-income living expenses to determine the relative costs of meeting national dietary guidelines. Results: Average food costs for healthy and convenience diets accounted for 18% and 37% of income, respectively. Dairy products and vegetables accounted for the largest cost percentages of diet costs (36% and 28%, respectively). The cost per calorie of a convenience diet was 24% higher than the healthy diet. Both models resulted in net financial loss over the course of a year for a single-parent, low-income family. Conclusions: Food costs represent a significant proportion of annual income. Diets based heavily on foods from convenient sources are less healthy and more expensive than a well-planned menu from budget foods available from large supermarket chains.

AB - Background and Objectives: Financial limitations in low-income populations, those at highest risk for poor health outcomes, may preclude adherence to recommended dietary guidelines. We examine the financial burden of shopping for foods to meet national dietary recommendations in a supermarket compared to eating primarily in a fast-food restaurant. Methods: Using a single-parent, low-income model, we obtained whole food costs (healthy) from local supermarkets and from fast-food outlets (convenient). Using cost per calorie as a metric for comparison, we used estimated single-parent, low-income living expenses to determine the relative costs of meeting national dietary guidelines. Results: Average food costs for healthy and convenience diets accounted for 18% and 37% of income, respectively. Dairy products and vegetables accounted for the largest cost percentages of diet costs (36% and 28%, respectively). The cost per calorie of a convenience diet was 24% higher than the healthy diet. Both models resulted in net financial loss over the course of a year for a single-parent, low-income family. Conclusions: Food costs represent a significant proportion of annual income. Diets based heavily on foods from convenient sources are less healthy and more expensive than a well-planned menu from budget foods available from large supermarket chains.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950655259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950655259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 20373171

AN - SCOPUS:77950655259

VL - 42

SP - 280

EP - 284

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 4

ER -