Crafting the Law: How Opinion Content Influences Legal Development

Michael J. Nelson, Rachael K. Hinkle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Why are some opinions widely discussed while others remain obscure? We theorize that opinions that can be understood efficiently are discussed, expanded, and contracted more frequently. Additionally, more persuasive precedents tend to be discussed and expanded more regularly, while less persuasive precedents are narrowed more often. These effects should also depend on institutional context. We compile an original dataset of 7,485 search and seizure opinions written by federal circuit and state high court judges and 567,062 judicial citations to those cases. The evidence demonstrates that efficiency, persuasiveness, and institutional context together determine how much an opinion affects legal development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-122
Number of pages26
JournalJustice System Journal
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 3 2018

Fingerprint

Law
seizure
efficiency
evidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Cite this

@article{a20c454565294f8592e2efa05664b840,
title = "Crafting the Law: How Opinion Content Influences Legal Development",
abstract = "Why are some opinions widely discussed while others remain obscure? We theorize that opinions that can be understood efficiently are discussed, expanded, and contracted more frequently. Additionally, more persuasive precedents tend to be discussed and expanded more regularly, while less persuasive precedents are narrowed more often. These effects should also depend on institutional context. We compile an original dataset of 7,485 search and seizure opinions written by federal circuit and state high court judges and 567,062 judicial citations to those cases. The evidence demonstrates that efficiency, persuasiveness, and institutional context together determine how much an opinion affects legal development.",
author = "Nelson, {Michael J.} and Hinkle, {Rachael K.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/0098261X.2017.1385432",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "97--122",
journal = "Justice System Journal",
issn = "0098-261X",
publisher = "National Center for State Courts",
number = "2",

}

Crafting the Law : How Opinion Content Influences Legal Development. / Nelson, Michael J.; Hinkle, Rachael K.

In: Justice System Journal, Vol. 39, No. 2, 03.04.2018, p. 97-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crafting the Law

T2 - How Opinion Content Influences Legal Development

AU - Nelson, Michael J.

AU - Hinkle, Rachael K.

PY - 2018/4/3

Y1 - 2018/4/3

N2 - Why are some opinions widely discussed while others remain obscure? We theorize that opinions that can be understood efficiently are discussed, expanded, and contracted more frequently. Additionally, more persuasive precedents tend to be discussed and expanded more regularly, while less persuasive precedents are narrowed more often. These effects should also depend on institutional context. We compile an original dataset of 7,485 search and seizure opinions written by federal circuit and state high court judges and 567,062 judicial citations to those cases. The evidence demonstrates that efficiency, persuasiveness, and institutional context together determine how much an opinion affects legal development.

AB - Why are some opinions widely discussed while others remain obscure? We theorize that opinions that can be understood efficiently are discussed, expanded, and contracted more frequently. Additionally, more persuasive precedents tend to be discussed and expanded more regularly, while less persuasive precedents are narrowed more often. These effects should also depend on institutional context. We compile an original dataset of 7,485 search and seizure opinions written by federal circuit and state high court judges and 567,062 judicial citations to those cases. The evidence demonstrates that efficiency, persuasiveness, and institutional context together determine how much an opinion affects legal development.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045125564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045125564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0098261X.2017.1385432

DO - 10.1080/0098261X.2017.1385432

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85045125564

VL - 39

SP - 97

EP - 122

JO - Justice System Journal

JF - Justice System Journal

SN - 0098-261X

IS - 2

ER -