TY - JOUR
T1 - Creating equitable opportunities
T2 - The thoughts of two administrator rhetoricians
AU - Wilson, Kirt H.
AU - Ono, Kent A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Academic institutions come in a wide variety of forms, including universities and colleges, departments and campus centers, professional associations, organizations, accrediting agencies, and presses. Each institutional type has unique characteristics and presents equally unique challenges, but we contend that they all play complex and often contradictory roles in scholars’ lives. Historically, these institutional structures provide resources, contexts, and “homes,” through which individual and collective advancement can be secured, at least within an allegedly meritocratic framework. Publications, awards, conference presentations, grant funding, teaching opportunities and releases, along with a wide array of other factors and activities are supported by and through institutions. In addition, institutions tend to be a, if not the, primary mechanism through which the informal and relational aspects of academic careers transpire. Coauthors often meet at conferences. Book projects may emerge within institutional academic spaces, for example, the synergy that develops during an especially powerful workshop event. Department colleagues sometimes become lifelong friends. Joint scholarship and, sometimes, collective care can begin or become strengthened in institutional spaces.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Michigan State University. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - In this article, the authors draw on their personal experiences as mid-career administrators and scholars of color to consider both the structures that limit, and opportunities for equity and social justice in, academic institutions. Although the primary logics that shape academic institutions serve to marginalize certain types of scholars and scholarship, they argue that institutions also contain gaps and contradictions where resistance is possible and from which alternative structures can be built. They identify and define three critical practices—storytelling, structural transformation, and allyship—that administrators can use to create a more equitable academy. The authors discuss why they believe it is important to invest in administrative and professional association service, where they have witnessed the gaps that make transformation possible, and how they have implemented critical administrative praxes.
AB - In this article, the authors draw on their personal experiences as mid-career administrators and scholars of color to consider both the structures that limit, and opportunities for equity and social justice in, academic institutions. Although the primary logics that shape academic institutions serve to marginalize certain types of scholars and scholarship, they argue that institutions also contain gaps and contradictions where resistance is possible and from which alternative structures can be built. They identify and define three critical practices—storytelling, structural transformation, and allyship—that administrators can use to create a more equitable academy. The authors discuss why they believe it is important to invest in administrative and professional association service, where they have witnessed the gaps that make transformation possible, and how they have implemented critical administrative praxes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113787792&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85113787792&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0169
DO - 10.14321/rhetpublaffa.24.1-2.0169
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85113787792
SN - 1094-8392
VL - 24
SP - 169
EP - 189
JO - Rhetoric and Public Affairs
JF - Rhetoric and Public Affairs
IS - 1-2
ER -