Creativity assessment in neuroscience research

Mathias Benedek, Alexander P. Christensen, Andreas Fink, Roger Beaty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The investigation of the neural correlates of creative cognition requires researchers to adapt creativity tasks to meet the constraints imposed by cognitive neuroscience research-assessing well-defined cognitive processes, repeated over many tasks. We present a brief review of essential study design parameters in neuroscience research on creativity, including number of task repetitions (i.e., trials), time on task, what kind of responses are collected (e.g., whether participants speak, write, draw, press buttons), and when these responses are collected (e.g., after or during task). We further examine how design parameters depend on neuroscience methods (e.g., fMRI, EEG) and task type (e.g., divergent thinking, creative problem solving). The review discloses a substantial heterogeneity of methodological approaches across studies but also identifies some established common practices. Typical adaptations include the employment of shortened tasks, which allows the realization of more tasks per session, and a more focused investigation of time-critical cognitive processes. Study designs also commonly separate periods of creative thought from response production to restrict the effect of response-related motor artifacts and to assess brain activity unique to the generation of creative ideas or solutions. We discuss the pros and cons of the various approaches with respect to the goal to increase reliability of neurophysiological measurements while maintaining valid assessments, and derive some recommendations for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)218-226
Number of pages9
JournalPsychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Creativity
Neurosciences
Electroencephalography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Research
Artifacts
Cognition
Research Personnel
Neuroscience
Electroencephalogram
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Brain
Cognitive Processes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Benedek, Mathias ; Christensen, Alexander P. ; Fink, Andreas ; Beaty, Roger. / Creativity assessment in neuroscience research. In: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2019 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 218-226.
@article{4c6d1614a7584917a93b5513501bce67,
title = "Creativity assessment in neuroscience research",
abstract = "The investigation of the neural correlates of creative cognition requires researchers to adapt creativity tasks to meet the constraints imposed by cognitive neuroscience research-assessing well-defined cognitive processes, repeated over many tasks. We present a brief review of essential study design parameters in neuroscience research on creativity, including number of task repetitions (i.e., trials), time on task, what kind of responses are collected (e.g., whether participants speak, write, draw, press buttons), and when these responses are collected (e.g., after or during task). We further examine how design parameters depend on neuroscience methods (e.g., fMRI, EEG) and task type (e.g., divergent thinking, creative problem solving). The review discloses a substantial heterogeneity of methodological approaches across studies but also identifies some established common practices. Typical adaptations include the employment of shortened tasks, which allows the realization of more tasks per session, and a more focused investigation of time-critical cognitive processes. Study designs also commonly separate periods of creative thought from response production to restrict the effect of response-related motor artifacts and to assess brain activity unique to the generation of creative ideas or solutions. We discuss the pros and cons of the various approaches with respect to the goal to increase reliability of neurophysiological measurements while maintaining valid assessments, and derive some recommendations for future research.",
author = "Mathias Benedek and Christensen, {Alexander P.} and Andreas Fink and Roger Beaty",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/aca0000215",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "218--226",
journal = "Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts",
issn = "1931-3896",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Creativity assessment in neuroscience research. / Benedek, Mathias; Christensen, Alexander P.; Fink, Andreas; Beaty, Roger.

In: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Vol. 13, No. 2, 01.05.2019, p. 218-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Creativity assessment in neuroscience research

AU - Benedek, Mathias

AU - Christensen, Alexander P.

AU - Fink, Andreas

AU - Beaty, Roger

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - The investigation of the neural correlates of creative cognition requires researchers to adapt creativity tasks to meet the constraints imposed by cognitive neuroscience research-assessing well-defined cognitive processes, repeated over many tasks. We present a brief review of essential study design parameters in neuroscience research on creativity, including number of task repetitions (i.e., trials), time on task, what kind of responses are collected (e.g., whether participants speak, write, draw, press buttons), and when these responses are collected (e.g., after or during task). We further examine how design parameters depend on neuroscience methods (e.g., fMRI, EEG) and task type (e.g., divergent thinking, creative problem solving). The review discloses a substantial heterogeneity of methodological approaches across studies but also identifies some established common practices. Typical adaptations include the employment of shortened tasks, which allows the realization of more tasks per session, and a more focused investigation of time-critical cognitive processes. Study designs also commonly separate periods of creative thought from response production to restrict the effect of response-related motor artifacts and to assess brain activity unique to the generation of creative ideas or solutions. We discuss the pros and cons of the various approaches with respect to the goal to increase reliability of neurophysiological measurements while maintaining valid assessments, and derive some recommendations for future research.

AB - The investigation of the neural correlates of creative cognition requires researchers to adapt creativity tasks to meet the constraints imposed by cognitive neuroscience research-assessing well-defined cognitive processes, repeated over many tasks. We present a brief review of essential study design parameters in neuroscience research on creativity, including number of task repetitions (i.e., trials), time on task, what kind of responses are collected (e.g., whether participants speak, write, draw, press buttons), and when these responses are collected (e.g., after or during task). We further examine how design parameters depend on neuroscience methods (e.g., fMRI, EEG) and task type (e.g., divergent thinking, creative problem solving). The review discloses a substantial heterogeneity of methodological approaches across studies but also identifies some established common practices. Typical adaptations include the employment of shortened tasks, which allows the realization of more tasks per session, and a more focused investigation of time-critical cognitive processes. Study designs also commonly separate periods of creative thought from response production to restrict the effect of response-related motor artifacts and to assess brain activity unique to the generation of creative ideas or solutions. We discuss the pros and cons of the various approaches with respect to the goal to increase reliability of neurophysiological measurements while maintaining valid assessments, and derive some recommendations for future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058171616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058171616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/aca0000215

DO - 10.1037/aca0000215

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85058171616

VL - 13

SP - 218

EP - 226

JO - Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

JF - Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

SN - 1931-3896

IS - 2

ER -