Credibility of analogue therapy rationales

Thomas D. Borkovec, Sidney D. Nau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Four hundred and fifty college students rated the credibility of the rationales and procedural descriptions of two therapy, three placebo, and one component-control procedure frequently used in analogue outcome research. The rating scale was designed to assess both the credibility and the expectancy for improvement generated by the rationales. The results indicated that the control conditions were, in general, less credible than the therapy conditions. Implications for outcome research are briefly discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)257-260
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1972

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Credibility of analogue therapy rationales'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this