Crop response to elevated CO2 and world food supply. A comment on "Food for Thought..." by Long et al., Science 312:1918-1921, 2006

Francesco N. Tubiello, Jeffrey S. Amthor, Kenneth J. Boote, Marcello Donatelli, William Easterling, Gunther Fischer, Roger M. Gifford, Mark Howden, John Reilly, Cynthia Rosenzweig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

179 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recent conclusions that new free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) data show a much lower crop yield response to elevated CO2 than thought previously - casting serious doubts on estimates of world food supply in the 21st century - are found to be incorrect, being based in part on technical inconsistencies and lacking statistical significance. First, we show that the magnitude of crop response to elevated CO2 is rather similar across FACE and non-FACE data-sets, as already indicated by several previous comprehensive experimental and modeling analyses, with some differences related to which "ambient" CO2 concentration is used for comparisons. Second, we find that results from most crop model simulations are consistent with the values from FACE experiments. Third, we argue that lower crop responses to elevated CO2 of the magnitudes in question would not significantly alter projections of world food supply. We conclude by highlighting the importance of a better understanding of crop response to elevated CO2 under a variety of experimental and modeling settings, and suggest steps necessary to avoid confusion in future meta-analyses and comparisons of experimental and model data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-223
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Agronomy
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2007

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Soil Science
  • Plant Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Crop response to elevated CO<sub>2</sub> and world food supply. A comment on "Food for Thought..." by Long et al., Science 312:1918-1921, 2006'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this