Crop response to elevated CO2 and world food supply. A comment on "Food for Thought..." by Long et al., Science 312:1918-1921, 2006

Francesco N. Tubiello, Jeffrey S. Amthor, Kenneth J. Boote, Marcello Donatelli, William Easterling, Gunther Fischer, Roger M. Gifford, Mark Howden, John Reilly, Cynthia Rosenzweig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

171 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent conclusions that new free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) data show a much lower crop yield response to elevated CO2 than thought previously - casting serious doubts on estimates of world food supply in the 21st century - are found to be incorrect, being based in part on technical inconsistencies and lacking statistical significance. First, we show that the magnitude of crop response to elevated CO2 is rather similar across FACE and non-FACE data-sets, as already indicated by several previous comprehensive experimental and modeling analyses, with some differences related to which "ambient" CO2 concentration is used for comparisons. Second, we find that results from most crop model simulations are consistent with the values from FACE experiments. Third, we argue that lower crop responses to elevated CO2 of the magnitudes in question would not significantly alter projections of world food supply. We conclude by highlighting the importance of a better understanding of crop response to elevated CO2 under a variety of experimental and modeling settings, and suggest steps necessary to avoid confusion in future meta-analyses and comparisons of experimental and model data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-223
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Agronomy
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2007

Fingerprint

carbon dioxide enrichment
food supply
free air carbon dioxide enrichment
carbon dioxide
crop
air
crops
yield response
twenty first century
crop yield
modeling
crop models
world
science
simulation
experiment
comparison

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Soil Science
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Tubiello, Francesco N. ; Amthor, Jeffrey S. ; Boote, Kenneth J. ; Donatelli, Marcello ; Easterling, William ; Fischer, Gunther ; Gifford, Roger M. ; Howden, Mark ; Reilly, John ; Rosenzweig, Cynthia. / Crop response to elevated CO2 and world food supply. A comment on "Food for Thought..." by Long et al., Science 312:1918-1921, 2006. In: European Journal of Agronomy. 2007 ; Vol. 26, No. 3. pp. 215-223.
@article{1778e25466f144ea8e7fd30282f83506,
title = "Crop response to elevated CO2 and world food supply. A comment on {"}Food for Thought...{"} by Long et al., Science 312:1918-1921, 2006",
abstract = "Recent conclusions that new free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) data show a much lower crop yield response to elevated CO2 than thought previously - casting serious doubts on estimates of world food supply in the 21st century - are found to be incorrect, being based in part on technical inconsistencies and lacking statistical significance. First, we show that the magnitude of crop response to elevated CO2 is rather similar across FACE and non-FACE data-sets, as already indicated by several previous comprehensive experimental and modeling analyses, with some differences related to which {"}ambient{"} CO2 concentration is used for comparisons. Second, we find that results from most crop model simulations are consistent with the values from FACE experiments. Third, we argue that lower crop responses to elevated CO2 of the magnitudes in question would not significantly alter projections of world food supply. We conclude by highlighting the importance of a better understanding of crop response to elevated CO2 under a variety of experimental and modeling settings, and suggest steps necessary to avoid confusion in future meta-analyses and comparisons of experimental and model data.",
author = "Tubiello, {Francesco N.} and Amthor, {Jeffrey S.} and Boote, {Kenneth J.} and Marcello Donatelli and William Easterling and Gunther Fischer and Gifford, {Roger M.} and Mark Howden and John Reilly and Cynthia Rosenzweig",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.eja.2006.10.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "215--223",
journal = "European Journal of Agronomy",
issn = "1161-0301",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Tubiello, FN, Amthor, JS, Boote, KJ, Donatelli, M, Easterling, W, Fischer, G, Gifford, RM, Howden, M, Reilly, J & Rosenzweig, C 2007, 'Crop response to elevated CO2 and world food supply. A comment on "Food for Thought..." by Long et al., Science 312:1918-1921, 2006', European Journal of Agronomy, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.10.002

Crop response to elevated CO2 and world food supply. A comment on "Food for Thought..." by Long et al., Science 312:1918-1921, 2006. / Tubiello, Francesco N.; Amthor, Jeffrey S.; Boote, Kenneth J.; Donatelli, Marcello; Easterling, William; Fischer, Gunther; Gifford, Roger M.; Howden, Mark; Reilly, John; Rosenzweig, Cynthia.

In: European Journal of Agronomy, Vol. 26, No. 3, 01.04.2007, p. 215-223.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crop response to elevated CO2 and world food supply. A comment on "Food for Thought..." by Long et al., Science 312:1918-1921, 2006

AU - Tubiello, Francesco N.

AU - Amthor, Jeffrey S.

AU - Boote, Kenneth J.

AU - Donatelli, Marcello

AU - Easterling, William

AU - Fischer, Gunther

AU - Gifford, Roger M.

AU - Howden, Mark

AU - Reilly, John

AU - Rosenzweig, Cynthia

PY - 2007/4/1

Y1 - 2007/4/1

N2 - Recent conclusions that new free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) data show a much lower crop yield response to elevated CO2 than thought previously - casting serious doubts on estimates of world food supply in the 21st century - are found to be incorrect, being based in part on technical inconsistencies and lacking statistical significance. First, we show that the magnitude of crop response to elevated CO2 is rather similar across FACE and non-FACE data-sets, as already indicated by several previous comprehensive experimental and modeling analyses, with some differences related to which "ambient" CO2 concentration is used for comparisons. Second, we find that results from most crop model simulations are consistent with the values from FACE experiments. Third, we argue that lower crop responses to elevated CO2 of the magnitudes in question would not significantly alter projections of world food supply. We conclude by highlighting the importance of a better understanding of crop response to elevated CO2 under a variety of experimental and modeling settings, and suggest steps necessary to avoid confusion in future meta-analyses and comparisons of experimental and model data.

AB - Recent conclusions that new free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) data show a much lower crop yield response to elevated CO2 than thought previously - casting serious doubts on estimates of world food supply in the 21st century - are found to be incorrect, being based in part on technical inconsistencies and lacking statistical significance. First, we show that the magnitude of crop response to elevated CO2 is rather similar across FACE and non-FACE data-sets, as already indicated by several previous comprehensive experimental and modeling analyses, with some differences related to which "ambient" CO2 concentration is used for comparisons. Second, we find that results from most crop model simulations are consistent with the values from FACE experiments. Third, we argue that lower crop responses to elevated CO2 of the magnitudes in question would not significantly alter projections of world food supply. We conclude by highlighting the importance of a better understanding of crop response to elevated CO2 under a variety of experimental and modeling settings, and suggest steps necessary to avoid confusion in future meta-analyses and comparisons of experimental and model data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847334806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847334806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eja.2006.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.eja.2006.10.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33847334806

VL - 26

SP - 215

EP - 223

JO - European Journal of Agronomy

JF - European Journal of Agronomy

SN - 1161-0301

IS - 3

ER -