Crossed lines in the racialization process: Race as a border concept

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract The phenomenological approach to racialization needs to be supplemented by a hermeneutics that examines the history of the various categories in terms of which people see and have seen race. An investigation of this kind suggests that instead of the rigid essentialism that is normally associated with the history of racism, race predominantly operates as a border concept, that is to say, a dynamic fluid concept whose core lies not at the center but at its edges. I illustrate this by an examination of the history of the distinctions between the races as it is revealed in legal, scientific, and philosophical sources. I focus especially on racial distinctions in the United States and on the way that the impact of miscegenation was negotiated leading to the so-called one-drop rule.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)206-228
Number of pages23
JournalResearch in Phenomenology
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 23 2012

Fingerprint

History
Racialization
Hermeneutics
Racism
Miscegenation
Essentialism

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{e28415e4c41f447190b0129c064af264,
title = "Crossed lines in the racialization process: Race as a border concept",
abstract = "Abstract The phenomenological approach to racialization needs to be supplemented by a hermeneutics that examines the history of the various categories in terms of which people see and have seen race. An investigation of this kind suggests that instead of the rigid essentialism that is normally associated with the history of racism, race predominantly operates as a border concept, that is to say, a dynamic fluid concept whose core lies not at the center but at its edges. I illustrate this by an examination of the history of the distinctions between the races as it is revealed in legal, scientific, and philosophical sources. I focus especially on racial distinctions in the United States and on the way that the impact of miscegenation was negotiated leading to the so-called one-drop rule.",
author = "Bernasconi, {Robert Lambert}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1163/156916412X651201",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "206--228",
journal = "Research in Phenomenology",
issn = "0085-5553",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "2",

}

Crossed lines in the racialization process : Race as a border concept. / Bernasconi, Robert Lambert.

In: Research in Phenomenology, Vol. 42, No. 2, 23.07.2012, p. 206-228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crossed lines in the racialization process

T2 - Race as a border concept

AU - Bernasconi, Robert Lambert

PY - 2012/7/23

Y1 - 2012/7/23

N2 - Abstract The phenomenological approach to racialization needs to be supplemented by a hermeneutics that examines the history of the various categories in terms of which people see and have seen race. An investigation of this kind suggests that instead of the rigid essentialism that is normally associated with the history of racism, race predominantly operates as a border concept, that is to say, a dynamic fluid concept whose core lies not at the center but at its edges. I illustrate this by an examination of the history of the distinctions between the races as it is revealed in legal, scientific, and philosophical sources. I focus especially on racial distinctions in the United States and on the way that the impact of miscegenation was negotiated leading to the so-called one-drop rule.

AB - Abstract The phenomenological approach to racialization needs to be supplemented by a hermeneutics that examines the history of the various categories in terms of which people see and have seen race. An investigation of this kind suggests that instead of the rigid essentialism that is normally associated with the history of racism, race predominantly operates as a border concept, that is to say, a dynamic fluid concept whose core lies not at the center but at its edges. I illustrate this by an examination of the history of the distinctions between the races as it is revealed in legal, scientific, and philosophical sources. I focus especially on racial distinctions in the United States and on the way that the impact of miscegenation was negotiated leading to the so-called one-drop rule.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863899885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863899885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/156916412X651201

DO - 10.1163/156916412X651201

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84863899885

VL - 42

SP - 206

EP - 228

JO - Research in Phenomenology

JF - Research in Phenomenology

SN - 0085-5553

IS - 2

ER -