CSR Participation Committees, Wildcat Strikes and the Sourcing Squeeze in Global Supply Chains

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lead firms in apparel global supply chains are increasingly using social compliance programmes that require worker-management participation committees in their supplier factories. These committees are designed to ensure respect for internationally recognized labour standards, to empower workers, and to reduce labour unrest. However, these committees have remained weak, and in countries such as Vietnam worker unrest remains common. This article argues that this is because lead firms in these CSR programmes are imposing a ‘sourcing squeeze’ on supplier factors by reducing the prices and production times they allot to their suppliers, which undermines efforts by committees to address cost-sensitive issues and overtime violations. At the same time, the sourcing squeeze increases strike leverage, providing workers with a much more effective source of worker voice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-98
Number of pages24
JournalBritish Journal of Industrial Relations
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Supply chains
Personnel
Industrial plants
Lead
Costs
Sourcing
Corporate Social Responsibility
Global supply chain
Participation
Workers
Suppliers
Compliance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

@article{cfe38ef2f5684e2586effc5621dd0678,
title = "CSR Participation Committees, Wildcat Strikes and the Sourcing Squeeze in Global Supply Chains",
abstract = "Lead firms in apparel global supply chains are increasingly using social compliance programmes that require worker-management participation committees in their supplier factories. These committees are designed to ensure respect for internationally recognized labour standards, to empower workers, and to reduce labour unrest. However, these committees have remained weak, and in countries such as Vietnam worker unrest remains common. This article argues that this is because lead firms in these CSR programmes are imposing a ‘sourcing squeeze’ on supplier factors by reducing the prices and production times they allot to their suppliers, which undermines efforts by committees to address cost-sensitive issues and overtime violations. At the same time, the sourcing squeeze increases strike leverage, providing workers with a much more effective source of worker voice.",
author = "Anner, {Mark Sebastian}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/bjir.12275",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "75--98",
journal = "British Journal of Industrial Relations",
issn = "0007-1080",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - CSR Participation Committees, Wildcat Strikes and the Sourcing Squeeze in Global Supply Chains

AU - Anner, Mark Sebastian

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Lead firms in apparel global supply chains are increasingly using social compliance programmes that require worker-management participation committees in their supplier factories. These committees are designed to ensure respect for internationally recognized labour standards, to empower workers, and to reduce labour unrest. However, these committees have remained weak, and in countries such as Vietnam worker unrest remains common. This article argues that this is because lead firms in these CSR programmes are imposing a ‘sourcing squeeze’ on supplier factors by reducing the prices and production times they allot to their suppliers, which undermines efforts by committees to address cost-sensitive issues and overtime violations. At the same time, the sourcing squeeze increases strike leverage, providing workers with a much more effective source of worker voice.

AB - Lead firms in apparel global supply chains are increasingly using social compliance programmes that require worker-management participation committees in their supplier factories. These committees are designed to ensure respect for internationally recognized labour standards, to empower workers, and to reduce labour unrest. However, these committees have remained weak, and in countries such as Vietnam worker unrest remains common. This article argues that this is because lead firms in these CSR programmes are imposing a ‘sourcing squeeze’ on supplier factors by reducing the prices and production times they allot to their suppliers, which undermines efforts by committees to address cost-sensitive issues and overtime violations. At the same time, the sourcing squeeze increases strike leverage, providing workers with a much more effective source of worker voice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032981596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032981596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/bjir.12275

DO - 10.1111/bjir.12275

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 75

EP - 98

JO - British Journal of Industrial Relations

JF - British Journal of Industrial Relations

SN - 0007-1080

IS - 1

ER -