Current practices in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery

Frank G. Garritano, Genevieve A. Andrews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background There has been recent investigation into the incidence of venous thromboembolism in otolaryngology, but the current utilization of venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis among practicing otolaryngologists remains largely unknown. Methods A survey of 26 questions was emailed to 4376 otolaryngologists. Results A total of 4376 surveys were sent and 676 were returned for a response rate of 15.4%. Intraoperative prophylaxis was used by 535 respondents (83%), either with intermittent pneumatic compression (91.8%), compression stockings (35.9%), or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH; 12.3%). Postoperative prophylaxis was used by 540 respondents (85.4%), either with early ambulation (87.8%), intermittent pneumatic compression (85.4%), compression stockings (43.3%), or LMWH (42.4%). The vast majority (88.3%) stated they would find thromboprophylaxis guidelines released by the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery to be helpful. Conclusion Current practices in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis vary widely among the otolaryngology community. A set of clear specialty-specific guidelines may be helpful.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E341-E345
JournalHead and Neck
Volume38
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Venous Thromboembolism
Otolaryngology
Low Molecular Weight Heparin
Neck
Head
Compression Stockings
Guidelines
Early Ambulation
Surveys and Questionnaires
Incidence
Otolaryngologists

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Garritano, Frank G. ; Andrews, Genevieve A. / Current practices in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. In: Head and Neck. 2016 ; Vol. 38. pp. E341-E345.
@article{9125973c66b14b808dd611ef4e05c8a2,
title = "Current practices in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery",
abstract = "Background There has been recent investigation into the incidence of venous thromboembolism in otolaryngology, but the current utilization of venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis among practicing otolaryngologists remains largely unknown. Methods A survey of 26 questions was emailed to 4376 otolaryngologists. Results A total of 4376 surveys were sent and 676 were returned for a response rate of 15.4{\%}. Intraoperative prophylaxis was used by 535 respondents (83{\%}), either with intermittent pneumatic compression (91.8{\%}), compression stockings (35.9{\%}), or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH; 12.3{\%}). Postoperative prophylaxis was used by 540 respondents (85.4{\%}), either with early ambulation (87.8{\%}), intermittent pneumatic compression (85.4{\%}), compression stockings (43.3{\%}), or LMWH (42.4{\%}). The vast majority (88.3{\%}) stated they would find thromboprophylaxis guidelines released by the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery to be helpful. Conclusion Current practices in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis vary widely among the otolaryngology community. A set of clear specialty-specific guidelines may be helpful.",
author = "Garritano, {Frank G.} and Andrews, {Genevieve A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/hed.23998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "E341--E345",
journal = "Head and Neck",
issn = "1043-3074",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

}

Current practices in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. / Garritano, Frank G.; Andrews, Genevieve A.

In: Head and Neck, Vol. 38, 01.04.2016, p. E341-E345.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current practices in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery

AU - Garritano, Frank G.

AU - Andrews, Genevieve A.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Background There has been recent investigation into the incidence of venous thromboembolism in otolaryngology, but the current utilization of venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis among practicing otolaryngologists remains largely unknown. Methods A survey of 26 questions was emailed to 4376 otolaryngologists. Results A total of 4376 surveys were sent and 676 were returned for a response rate of 15.4%. Intraoperative prophylaxis was used by 535 respondents (83%), either with intermittent pneumatic compression (91.8%), compression stockings (35.9%), or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH; 12.3%). Postoperative prophylaxis was used by 540 respondents (85.4%), either with early ambulation (87.8%), intermittent pneumatic compression (85.4%), compression stockings (43.3%), or LMWH (42.4%). The vast majority (88.3%) stated they would find thromboprophylaxis guidelines released by the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery to be helpful. Conclusion Current practices in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis vary widely among the otolaryngology community. A set of clear specialty-specific guidelines may be helpful.

AB - Background There has been recent investigation into the incidence of venous thromboembolism in otolaryngology, but the current utilization of venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis among practicing otolaryngologists remains largely unknown. Methods A survey of 26 questions was emailed to 4376 otolaryngologists. Results A total of 4376 surveys were sent and 676 were returned for a response rate of 15.4%. Intraoperative prophylaxis was used by 535 respondents (83%), either with intermittent pneumatic compression (91.8%), compression stockings (35.9%), or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH; 12.3%). Postoperative prophylaxis was used by 540 respondents (85.4%), either with early ambulation (87.8%), intermittent pneumatic compression (85.4%), compression stockings (43.3%), or LMWH (42.4%). The vast majority (88.3%) stated they would find thromboprophylaxis guidelines released by the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery to be helpful. Conclusion Current practices in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis vary widely among the otolaryngology community. A set of clear specialty-specific guidelines may be helpful.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930988802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930988802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hed.23998

DO - 10.1002/hed.23998

M3 - Article

C2 - 25581619

AN - SCOPUS:84930988802

VL - 38

SP - E341-E345

JO - Head and Neck

JF - Head and Neck

SN - 1043-3074

ER -