Abstract

In this Invited Commentary, the authors propose a counterperspective to the article by Borkan and colleagues, who advocate for a circumscribed, piloted, choice-focused approach to introducing curricular redesign options in undergraduate medical education, particularly in the area of health systems science. In making this case, Borkan and colleagues cluster several kinds of innovative curricular changes that the authors of this commentary believe are best separated by the scope of change and associated educational strategy: (1) innovations customized to student interest and motivation, which are best served by focused programmatic interventions; (2) innovations such as longitudinal integrated clerkships that represent creative and needed educational strategies but may be difficult to expand because of complex barriers; and (3) innovations that are truly transformational, with critical connections far beyond the boundaries of the medical school curriculum, which must be addressed in a comprehensive approach- despite the challenges, frustrations, and difficulties. The authors situate health systems science squarely into the third category, and address three important questions addressing the nature and demands of this change. In making these arguments, the authors draw from experiences at the Penn State College of Medicine and collaborations with other U.S. medical schools related to large-scale curricular transformation and challenges that impact this change. The authors contend that medical education needs to navigate this major change for all students in a way that not only succeeds for learners but, more important, addresses the needs of patients seeking care in rapidly evolving systems of care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1431-1433
Number of pages3
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume93
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

global change
innovation
science
health
frustration
school
education
student
medicine
curriculum
experience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

@article{c28553f3773a4de99bcc4342b86150f9,
title = "Curricular transformation in health systems science: The need for global change",
abstract = "In this Invited Commentary, the authors propose a counterperspective to the article by Borkan and colleagues, who advocate for a circumscribed, piloted, choice-focused approach to introducing curricular redesign options in undergraduate medical education, particularly in the area of health systems science. In making this case, Borkan and colleagues cluster several kinds of innovative curricular changes that the authors of this commentary believe are best separated by the scope of change and associated educational strategy: (1) innovations customized to student interest and motivation, which are best served by focused programmatic interventions; (2) innovations such as longitudinal integrated clerkships that represent creative and needed educational strategies but may be difficult to expand because of complex barriers; and (3) innovations that are truly transformational, with critical connections far beyond the boundaries of the medical school curriculum, which must be addressed in a comprehensive approach- despite the challenges, frustrations, and difficulties. The authors situate health systems science squarely into the third category, and address three important questions addressing the nature and demands of this change. In making these arguments, the authors draw from experiences at the Penn State College of Medicine and collaborations with other U.S. medical schools related to large-scale curricular transformation and challenges that impact this change. The authors contend that medical education needs to navigate this major change for all students in a way that not only succeeds for learners but, more important, addresses the needs of patients seeking care in rapidly evolving systems of care.",
author = "Jed Gonzalo and Therese Wolpaw and Daniel Wolpaw",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000002284",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "1431--1433",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

Curricular transformation in health systems science : The need for global change. / Gonzalo, Jed; Wolpaw, Therese; Wolpaw, Daniel.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 93, No. 10, 01.01.2018, p. 1431-1433.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Curricular transformation in health systems science

T2 - The need for global change

AU - Gonzalo, Jed

AU - Wolpaw, Therese

AU - Wolpaw, Daniel

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - In this Invited Commentary, the authors propose a counterperspective to the article by Borkan and colleagues, who advocate for a circumscribed, piloted, choice-focused approach to introducing curricular redesign options in undergraduate medical education, particularly in the area of health systems science. In making this case, Borkan and colleagues cluster several kinds of innovative curricular changes that the authors of this commentary believe are best separated by the scope of change and associated educational strategy: (1) innovations customized to student interest and motivation, which are best served by focused programmatic interventions; (2) innovations such as longitudinal integrated clerkships that represent creative and needed educational strategies but may be difficult to expand because of complex barriers; and (3) innovations that are truly transformational, with critical connections far beyond the boundaries of the medical school curriculum, which must be addressed in a comprehensive approach- despite the challenges, frustrations, and difficulties. The authors situate health systems science squarely into the third category, and address three important questions addressing the nature and demands of this change. In making these arguments, the authors draw from experiences at the Penn State College of Medicine and collaborations with other U.S. medical schools related to large-scale curricular transformation and challenges that impact this change. The authors contend that medical education needs to navigate this major change for all students in a way that not only succeeds for learners but, more important, addresses the needs of patients seeking care in rapidly evolving systems of care.

AB - In this Invited Commentary, the authors propose a counterperspective to the article by Borkan and colleagues, who advocate for a circumscribed, piloted, choice-focused approach to introducing curricular redesign options in undergraduate medical education, particularly in the area of health systems science. In making this case, Borkan and colleagues cluster several kinds of innovative curricular changes that the authors of this commentary believe are best separated by the scope of change and associated educational strategy: (1) innovations customized to student interest and motivation, which are best served by focused programmatic interventions; (2) innovations such as longitudinal integrated clerkships that represent creative and needed educational strategies but may be difficult to expand because of complex barriers; and (3) innovations that are truly transformational, with critical connections far beyond the boundaries of the medical school curriculum, which must be addressed in a comprehensive approach- despite the challenges, frustrations, and difficulties. The authors situate health systems science squarely into the third category, and address three important questions addressing the nature and demands of this change. In making these arguments, the authors draw from experiences at the Penn State College of Medicine and collaborations with other U.S. medical schools related to large-scale curricular transformation and challenges that impact this change. The authors contend that medical education needs to navigate this major change for all students in a way that not only succeeds for learners but, more important, addresses the needs of patients seeking care in rapidly evolving systems of care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063745691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063745691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002284

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002284

M3 - Article

C2 - 29742614

AN - SCOPUS:85063745691

VL - 93

SP - 1431

EP - 1433

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 10

ER -