Curriculum changes to increase research in a family medicine residency program

Robert Lennon, Anna L. Oberhofer, Vanessa Mcnair, James W. Keck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Scholarly activity is an important component of residency programs. Amidst many other professional obligations, finding time and support for resident research can be challenging. Thus, it is important to equip residents with the tools needed to perform scholarly activity both during and after residency. METHODS: We studied a series of curriculum initiatives on scholarly productivity at Naval Hospital Jacksonville. Educational interventions were rolled out in three parts. First, a faculty research coordinator (FRC) was established. Second, a scholarly activity point system was adapted from one published by Seehusen et al, along with research and conference tracking systems. Third, a resident research coordinator (RRC) position was created. The FRC and RRC acted as liaisons between residents, faculty, and non-faculty staff and created an annual scholarly activity workshop. Scholarly productivity was analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Prior to the roll out of these curriculum changes, the number of resident scholarly projects per resident, defined as regional or higher posters/ presentations and peer-reviewed publications, was 0.07 with four residents involved. In 2012, the research per resident was 0.91, with 26 residents involved. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis reveals an association between these new curricular initiatives and increased research among residents, similar to growth demonstrated by the innovations of Seehusen et al. Limitations of this study include reliance on the accuracy of past records and a small sample size. We believe this is a model that could be implemented in other residency programs to support scholarly activity requirements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)294-296
Number of pages3
JournalFamily medicine
Volume46
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Curriculum
Medicine
Research
Posters
Sample Size
Publications
Education
Growth

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Family Practice
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Lennon, R., Oberhofer, A. L., Mcnair, V., & Keck, J. W. (2014). Curriculum changes to increase research in a family medicine residency program. Family medicine, 46(4), 294-296.
Lennon, Robert ; Oberhofer, Anna L. ; Mcnair, Vanessa ; Keck, James W. / Curriculum changes to increase research in a family medicine residency program. In: Family medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 46, No. 4. pp. 294-296.
@article{cc9ae607235b43968ee68a4ddc07063a,
title = "Curriculum changes to increase research in a family medicine residency program",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Scholarly activity is an important component of residency programs. Amidst many other professional obligations, finding time and support for resident research can be challenging. Thus, it is important to equip residents with the tools needed to perform scholarly activity both during and after residency. METHODS: We studied a series of curriculum initiatives on scholarly productivity at Naval Hospital Jacksonville. Educational interventions were rolled out in three parts. First, a faculty research coordinator (FRC) was established. Second, a scholarly activity point system was adapted from one published by Seehusen et al, along with research and conference tracking systems. Third, a resident research coordinator (RRC) position was created. The FRC and RRC acted as liaisons between residents, faculty, and non-faculty staff and created an annual scholarly activity workshop. Scholarly productivity was analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Prior to the roll out of these curriculum changes, the number of resident scholarly projects per resident, defined as regional or higher posters/ presentations and peer-reviewed publications, was 0.07 with four residents involved. In 2012, the research per resident was 0.91, with 26 residents involved. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis reveals an association between these new curricular initiatives and increased research among residents, similar to growth demonstrated by the innovations of Seehusen et al. Limitations of this study include reliance on the accuracy of past records and a small sample size. We believe this is a model that could be implemented in other residency programs to support scholarly activity requirements.",
author = "Robert Lennon and Oberhofer, {Anna L.} and Vanessa Mcnair and Keck, {James W.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "294--296",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "4",

}

Lennon, R, Oberhofer, AL, Mcnair, V & Keck, JW 2014, 'Curriculum changes to increase research in a family medicine residency program', Family medicine, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 294-296.

Curriculum changes to increase research in a family medicine residency program. / Lennon, Robert; Oberhofer, Anna L.; Mcnair, Vanessa; Keck, James W.

In: Family medicine, Vol. 46, No. 4, 01.01.2014, p. 294-296.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Curriculum changes to increase research in a family medicine residency program

AU - Lennon, Robert

AU - Oberhofer, Anna L.

AU - Mcnair, Vanessa

AU - Keck, James W.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Scholarly activity is an important component of residency programs. Amidst many other professional obligations, finding time and support for resident research can be challenging. Thus, it is important to equip residents with the tools needed to perform scholarly activity both during and after residency. METHODS: We studied a series of curriculum initiatives on scholarly productivity at Naval Hospital Jacksonville. Educational interventions were rolled out in three parts. First, a faculty research coordinator (FRC) was established. Second, a scholarly activity point system was adapted from one published by Seehusen et al, along with research and conference tracking systems. Third, a resident research coordinator (RRC) position was created. The FRC and RRC acted as liaisons between residents, faculty, and non-faculty staff and created an annual scholarly activity workshop. Scholarly productivity was analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Prior to the roll out of these curriculum changes, the number of resident scholarly projects per resident, defined as regional or higher posters/ presentations and peer-reviewed publications, was 0.07 with four residents involved. In 2012, the research per resident was 0.91, with 26 residents involved. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis reveals an association between these new curricular initiatives and increased research among residents, similar to growth demonstrated by the innovations of Seehusen et al. Limitations of this study include reliance on the accuracy of past records and a small sample size. We believe this is a model that could be implemented in other residency programs to support scholarly activity requirements.

AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Scholarly activity is an important component of residency programs. Amidst many other professional obligations, finding time and support for resident research can be challenging. Thus, it is important to equip residents with the tools needed to perform scholarly activity both during and after residency. METHODS: We studied a series of curriculum initiatives on scholarly productivity at Naval Hospital Jacksonville. Educational interventions were rolled out in three parts. First, a faculty research coordinator (FRC) was established. Second, a scholarly activity point system was adapted from one published by Seehusen et al, along with research and conference tracking systems. Third, a resident research coordinator (RRC) position was created. The FRC and RRC acted as liaisons between residents, faculty, and non-faculty staff and created an annual scholarly activity workshop. Scholarly productivity was analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Prior to the roll out of these curriculum changes, the number of resident scholarly projects per resident, defined as regional or higher posters/ presentations and peer-reviewed publications, was 0.07 with four residents involved. In 2012, the research per resident was 0.91, with 26 residents involved. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis reveals an association between these new curricular initiatives and increased research among residents, similar to growth demonstrated by the innovations of Seehusen et al. Limitations of this study include reliance on the accuracy of past records and a small sample size. We believe this is a model that could be implemented in other residency programs to support scholarly activity requirements.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898890655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898890655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 24788427

AN - SCOPUS:84898890655

VL - 46

SP - 294

EP - 296

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 4

ER -