Curve number and runoff coefficients for extensive living roofs

Elizabeth Fassman-Beck, William Hunt, Robert Berghage, Jr., Donald Carpenter, Timothy Kurtz, Virginia Stovin, Bridget Wadzuk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Living roofs are a green infrastructure (GI)/low-impact development (LID) stormwater control measure (SCM) increasingly drawing worldwide attention. Despite substantial performance evidence in the literature, the lack of a curve number (CN) or volumetric runoff coefficient (Cv) to apply to prescribed methodologies for planning and regulatory submissions may be perceived as a barrier for implementation. Paired rainfall-runoff data were analyzed for up to 21 living roofs with varying configurations and in different climates from studies identified in the literature and previously-unpublished data. Frequency analysis of empirical performance evidence from 14 living roofs indicates that meaningful runoff is not generated from the majority of small rainfall events. Where planning requires the use of the CN method, a step function is suggested: (1) runoff volume=0 for design rainfall events up to 20-30 mm, if appropriate moisture storage capacity is provided by the substrate; (2) runoff volume is determined with CN=84 for larger rainfall events, or for events that exceed the actual moisture storage capacity. Cv increases with rainfall depth (P), and may be reasonably predicted for 16 living roofs by Cv =a * exp(b/P), where regression coefficients a and b were empirically determined for each climate zone. CN or Cv values are considered best fit, but they are generally poor representations of actual living roof hydrology. Further work is required to develop living roof specific, verified continuous simulation computer-modeling techniques and to quantify the role of the plants in stormwater control.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number04015073
JournalJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Runoff
Roofs
roof
Rain
runoff
rainfall
stormwater
Moisture
moisture
Planning
Hydrology
frequency analysis
climate
computer simulation
hydrology
infrastructure
substrate
methodology
Computer simulation
Substrates

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Fassman-Beck, E., Hunt, W., Berghage, Jr., R., Carpenter, D., Kurtz, T., Stovin, V., & Wadzuk, B. (2016). Curve number and runoff coefficients for extensive living roofs. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 21(3), [04015073]. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001318
Fassman-Beck, Elizabeth ; Hunt, William ; Berghage, Jr., Robert ; Carpenter, Donald ; Kurtz, Timothy ; Stovin, Virginia ; Wadzuk, Bridget. / Curve number and runoff coefficients for extensive living roofs. In: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. 2016 ; Vol. 21, No. 3.
@article{1ceea897a097470c9a2e00afa54b7ff6,
title = "Curve number and runoff coefficients for extensive living roofs",
abstract = "Living roofs are a green infrastructure (GI)/low-impact development (LID) stormwater control measure (SCM) increasingly drawing worldwide attention. Despite substantial performance evidence in the literature, the lack of a curve number (CN) or volumetric runoff coefficient (Cv) to apply to prescribed methodologies for planning and regulatory submissions may be perceived as a barrier for implementation. Paired rainfall-runoff data were analyzed for up to 21 living roofs with varying configurations and in different climates from studies identified in the literature and previously-unpublished data. Frequency analysis of empirical performance evidence from 14 living roofs indicates that meaningful runoff is not generated from the majority of small rainfall events. Where planning requires the use of the CN method, a step function is suggested: (1) runoff volume=0 for design rainfall events up to 20-30 mm, if appropriate moisture storage capacity is provided by the substrate; (2) runoff volume is determined with CN=84 for larger rainfall events, or for events that exceed the actual moisture storage capacity. Cv increases with rainfall depth (P), and may be reasonably predicted for 16 living roofs by Cv =a * exp(b/P), where regression coefficients a and b were empirically determined for each climate zone. CN or Cv values are considered best fit, but they are generally poor representations of actual living roof hydrology. Further work is required to develop living roof specific, verified continuous simulation computer-modeling techniques and to quantify the role of the plants in stormwater control.",
author = "Elizabeth Fassman-Beck and William Hunt and {Berghage, Jr.}, Robert and Donald Carpenter and Timothy Kurtz and Virginia Stovin and Bridget Wadzuk",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001318",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
journal = "Journal of Hydrologic Engineering - ASCE",
issn = "1084-0699",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "3",

}

Fassman-Beck, E, Hunt, W, Berghage, Jr., R, Carpenter, D, Kurtz, T, Stovin, V & Wadzuk, B 2016, 'Curve number and runoff coefficients for extensive living roofs', Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, vol. 21, no. 3, 04015073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001318

Curve number and runoff coefficients for extensive living roofs. / Fassman-Beck, Elizabeth; Hunt, William; Berghage, Jr., Robert; Carpenter, Donald; Kurtz, Timothy; Stovin, Virginia; Wadzuk, Bridget.

In: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 3, 04015073, 01.03.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Curve number and runoff coefficients for extensive living roofs

AU - Fassman-Beck, Elizabeth

AU - Hunt, William

AU - Berghage, Jr., Robert

AU - Carpenter, Donald

AU - Kurtz, Timothy

AU - Stovin, Virginia

AU - Wadzuk, Bridget

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Living roofs are a green infrastructure (GI)/low-impact development (LID) stormwater control measure (SCM) increasingly drawing worldwide attention. Despite substantial performance evidence in the literature, the lack of a curve number (CN) or volumetric runoff coefficient (Cv) to apply to prescribed methodologies for planning and regulatory submissions may be perceived as a barrier for implementation. Paired rainfall-runoff data were analyzed for up to 21 living roofs with varying configurations and in different climates from studies identified in the literature and previously-unpublished data. Frequency analysis of empirical performance evidence from 14 living roofs indicates that meaningful runoff is not generated from the majority of small rainfall events. Where planning requires the use of the CN method, a step function is suggested: (1) runoff volume=0 for design rainfall events up to 20-30 mm, if appropriate moisture storage capacity is provided by the substrate; (2) runoff volume is determined with CN=84 for larger rainfall events, or for events that exceed the actual moisture storage capacity. Cv increases with rainfall depth (P), and may be reasonably predicted for 16 living roofs by Cv =a * exp(b/P), where regression coefficients a and b were empirically determined for each climate zone. CN or Cv values are considered best fit, but they are generally poor representations of actual living roof hydrology. Further work is required to develop living roof specific, verified continuous simulation computer-modeling techniques and to quantify the role of the plants in stormwater control.

AB - Living roofs are a green infrastructure (GI)/low-impact development (LID) stormwater control measure (SCM) increasingly drawing worldwide attention. Despite substantial performance evidence in the literature, the lack of a curve number (CN) or volumetric runoff coefficient (Cv) to apply to prescribed methodologies for planning and regulatory submissions may be perceived as a barrier for implementation. Paired rainfall-runoff data were analyzed for up to 21 living roofs with varying configurations and in different climates from studies identified in the literature and previously-unpublished data. Frequency analysis of empirical performance evidence from 14 living roofs indicates that meaningful runoff is not generated from the majority of small rainfall events. Where planning requires the use of the CN method, a step function is suggested: (1) runoff volume=0 for design rainfall events up to 20-30 mm, if appropriate moisture storage capacity is provided by the substrate; (2) runoff volume is determined with CN=84 for larger rainfall events, or for events that exceed the actual moisture storage capacity. Cv increases with rainfall depth (P), and may be reasonably predicted for 16 living roofs by Cv =a * exp(b/P), where regression coefficients a and b were empirically determined for each climate zone. CN or Cv values are considered best fit, but they are generally poor representations of actual living roof hydrology. Further work is required to develop living roof specific, verified continuous simulation computer-modeling techniques and to quantify the role of the plants in stormwater control.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958568228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958568228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001318

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001318

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84958568228

VL - 21

JO - Journal of Hydrologic Engineering - ASCE

JF - Journal of Hydrologic Engineering - ASCE

SN - 1084-0699

IS - 3

M1 - 04015073

ER -