Darwin on Race, Gender, and Culture

Stephanie Shields, Sunil Bhatia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Darwin's theories of natural selection and sexual selection are significant scientific achievements, although his understanding of race and gender was defined and limited by his own life circumstances and the sociohistorical context within which he worked. This article considers the ways in which race, gender, and culture were represented and explained by Darwin and the ways in which his observations and opinions on gender and race were taken up by others and, more often than not, misapplied. Whereas the challenge of race (for Darwin) was to demonstrate the fundamental similarity and, hence, the common origin, of human races, the challenge of gender (for Darwin) was to identify a mechanism that could account for differences between women and men that, to him, were obvious, fundamental, and significant. The article concludes by considering the implications of Darwin's views for contemporary scientific psychology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-119
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume64
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2009

Fingerprint

Genetic Selection
Psychology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Shields, Stephanie ; Bhatia, Sunil. / Darwin on Race, Gender, and Culture. In: American Psychologist. 2009 ; Vol. 64, No. 2. pp. 111-119.
@article{a783d732b0eb4ea79e9677cda226f410,
title = "Darwin on Race, Gender, and Culture",
abstract = "Darwin's theories of natural selection and sexual selection are significant scientific achievements, although his understanding of race and gender was defined and limited by his own life circumstances and the sociohistorical context within which he worked. This article considers the ways in which race, gender, and culture were represented and explained by Darwin and the ways in which his observations and opinions on gender and race were taken up by others and, more often than not, misapplied. Whereas the challenge of race (for Darwin) was to demonstrate the fundamental similarity and, hence, the common origin, of human races, the challenge of gender (for Darwin) was to identify a mechanism that could account for differences between women and men that, to him, were obvious, fundamental, and significant. The article concludes by considering the implications of Darwin's views for contemporary scientific psychology.",
author = "Stephanie Shields and Sunil Bhatia",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0013502",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "111--119",
journal = "American Psychologist",
issn = "0003-066X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Darwin on Race, Gender, and Culture. / Shields, Stephanie; Bhatia, Sunil.

In: American Psychologist, Vol. 64, No. 2, 01.02.2009, p. 111-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Darwin on Race, Gender, and Culture

AU - Shields, Stephanie

AU - Bhatia, Sunil

PY - 2009/2/1

Y1 - 2009/2/1

N2 - Darwin's theories of natural selection and sexual selection are significant scientific achievements, although his understanding of race and gender was defined and limited by his own life circumstances and the sociohistorical context within which he worked. This article considers the ways in which race, gender, and culture were represented and explained by Darwin and the ways in which his observations and opinions on gender and race were taken up by others and, more often than not, misapplied. Whereas the challenge of race (for Darwin) was to demonstrate the fundamental similarity and, hence, the common origin, of human races, the challenge of gender (for Darwin) was to identify a mechanism that could account for differences between women and men that, to him, were obvious, fundamental, and significant. The article concludes by considering the implications of Darwin's views for contemporary scientific psychology.

AB - Darwin's theories of natural selection and sexual selection are significant scientific achievements, although his understanding of race and gender was defined and limited by his own life circumstances and the sociohistorical context within which he worked. This article considers the ways in which race, gender, and culture were represented and explained by Darwin and the ways in which his observations and opinions on gender and race were taken up by others and, more often than not, misapplied. Whereas the challenge of race (for Darwin) was to demonstrate the fundamental similarity and, hence, the common origin, of human races, the challenge of gender (for Darwin) was to identify a mechanism that could account for differences between women and men that, to him, were obvious, fundamental, and significant. The article concludes by considering the implications of Darwin's views for contemporary scientific psychology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61349183746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61349183746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0013502

DO - 10.1037/a0013502

M3 - Article

C2 - 19203143

AN - SCOPUS:61349183746

VL - 64

SP - 111

EP - 119

JO - American Psychologist

JF - American Psychologist

SN - 0003-066X

IS - 2

ER -