De jure versus de facto institutions

Trust, information, and collective efforts to manage the invasive mile-a-minute weed (Mikania micrantha)

Abigail Sullivan, Abigail M. York, Dave D. White, Sharon J. Hall, Scott Thomas Yabiku

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Differences in governance relationships and community efforts to remove an exotic, rapidly spreading invasive plant, the-mile-a-minute weed (Mikania micrantha), are explored in five case study community forests in the subtropical region of Chitwan, Nepal. An institutional analysis informs an examination of the de jure (formal) versus de facto (on the ground) institutions and actor relationships relevant to Mikania removal efforts. Contrary to the expectations set by the de jure situation, we find heterogeneous governance relationships and norms related to Mikania management across community forests. Content analysis of interview data illuminates reoccurring themes and their implications for social and ecological outcomes in the communities. Complex governance relationships and regular discussion of distrust of government and non-government officials help explain collective action efforts and management decisions. The content analysis suggests that Mikania is impacting people’s daily lives but the degree of severity and the response to the disruption varies substantially and is affected by other problems experienced by community forest members. Our results indicate that understanding how the de facto, or on the ground situation, differs from the de jure institutions may be vital in structuring successful efforts to manage invasive species and understanding collective action problems related to other social-ecological threats. We present data-informed propositions about common pool resource management and invasive species. This study contributes to a better scientific understanding of how institutions mediate social-ecological challenges influencing common pool resources more broadly.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-199
Number of pages29
JournalInternational Journal of the Commons
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

community
governance
collective behavior
content analysis
management decision
social institution
Nepal
management
resources
threat
examination
interview

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{ba70a59dcca24f10b33473ee8054781c,
title = "De jure versus de facto institutions: Trust, information, and collective efforts to manage the invasive mile-a-minute weed (Mikania micrantha)",
abstract = "Differences in governance relationships and community efforts to remove an exotic, rapidly spreading invasive plant, the-mile-a-minute weed (Mikania micrantha), are explored in five case study community forests in the subtropical region of Chitwan, Nepal. An institutional analysis informs an examination of the de jure (formal) versus de facto (on the ground) institutions and actor relationships relevant to Mikania removal efforts. Contrary to the expectations set by the de jure situation, we find heterogeneous governance relationships and norms related to Mikania management across community forests. Content analysis of interview data illuminates reoccurring themes and their implications for social and ecological outcomes in the communities. Complex governance relationships and regular discussion of distrust of government and non-government officials help explain collective action efforts and management decisions. The content analysis suggests that Mikania is impacting people’s daily lives but the degree of severity and the response to the disruption varies substantially and is affected by other problems experienced by community forest members. Our results indicate that understanding how the de facto, or on the ground situation, differs from the de jure institutions may be vital in structuring successful efforts to manage invasive species and understanding collective action problems related to other social-ecological threats. We present data-informed propositions about common pool resource management and invasive species. This study contributes to a better scientific understanding of how institutions mediate social-ecological challenges influencing common pool resources more broadly.",
author = "Abigail Sullivan and York, {Abigail M.} and White, {Dave D.} and Hall, {Sharon J.} and Yabiku, {Scott Thomas}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.18352/ijc.676",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "171--199",
journal = "International Journal of the Commons",
issn = "1875-0281",
publisher = "International Association for the Study of the Commons",
number = "1",

}

De jure versus de facto institutions : Trust, information, and collective efforts to manage the invasive mile-a-minute weed (Mikania micrantha). / Sullivan, Abigail; York, Abigail M.; White, Dave D.; Hall, Sharon J.; Yabiku, Scott Thomas.

In: International Journal of the Commons, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 171-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - De jure versus de facto institutions

T2 - Trust, information, and collective efforts to manage the invasive mile-a-minute weed (Mikania micrantha)

AU - Sullivan, Abigail

AU - York, Abigail M.

AU - White, Dave D.

AU - Hall, Sharon J.

AU - Yabiku, Scott Thomas

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Differences in governance relationships and community efforts to remove an exotic, rapidly spreading invasive plant, the-mile-a-minute weed (Mikania micrantha), are explored in five case study community forests in the subtropical region of Chitwan, Nepal. An institutional analysis informs an examination of the de jure (formal) versus de facto (on the ground) institutions and actor relationships relevant to Mikania removal efforts. Contrary to the expectations set by the de jure situation, we find heterogeneous governance relationships and norms related to Mikania management across community forests. Content analysis of interview data illuminates reoccurring themes and their implications for social and ecological outcomes in the communities. Complex governance relationships and regular discussion of distrust of government and non-government officials help explain collective action efforts and management decisions. The content analysis suggests that Mikania is impacting people’s daily lives but the degree of severity and the response to the disruption varies substantially and is affected by other problems experienced by community forest members. Our results indicate that understanding how the de facto, or on the ground situation, differs from the de jure institutions may be vital in structuring successful efforts to manage invasive species and understanding collective action problems related to other social-ecological threats. We present data-informed propositions about common pool resource management and invasive species. This study contributes to a better scientific understanding of how institutions mediate social-ecological challenges influencing common pool resources more broadly.

AB - Differences in governance relationships and community efforts to remove an exotic, rapidly spreading invasive plant, the-mile-a-minute weed (Mikania micrantha), are explored in five case study community forests in the subtropical region of Chitwan, Nepal. An institutional analysis informs an examination of the de jure (formal) versus de facto (on the ground) institutions and actor relationships relevant to Mikania removal efforts. Contrary to the expectations set by the de jure situation, we find heterogeneous governance relationships and norms related to Mikania management across community forests. Content analysis of interview data illuminates reoccurring themes and their implications for social and ecological outcomes in the communities. Complex governance relationships and regular discussion of distrust of government and non-government officials help explain collective action efforts and management decisions. The content analysis suggests that Mikania is impacting people’s daily lives but the degree of severity and the response to the disruption varies substantially and is affected by other problems experienced by community forest members. Our results indicate that understanding how the de facto, or on the ground situation, differs from the de jure institutions may be vital in structuring successful efforts to manage invasive species and understanding collective action problems related to other social-ecological threats. We present data-informed propositions about common pool resource management and invasive species. This study contributes to a better scientific understanding of how institutions mediate social-ecological challenges influencing common pool resources more broadly.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017575220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017575220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18352/ijc.676

DO - 10.18352/ijc.676

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 171

EP - 199

JO - International Journal of the Commons

JF - International Journal of the Commons

SN - 1875-0281

IS - 1

ER -