Debating Unconventional Energy: Social, Political, and Economic Implications

Kate J. Neville, Jennifer Baka, Shanti Gamper-Rabindran, Karen Bakker, Stefan Andreasson, Avner Vengosh, Alvin Lin, Jewellord Nem Singh, Erika Weinthal

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The extraction of unconventional oil and gas-from shale rocks, tight sand, and coalbed formations-is shifting the geographies of fossil fuel production, with complex consequences. Following Jackson et al.'s (1) natural science survey of the environmental consequences of hydraulic fracturing, this review examines social science literature on unconventional energy. After an overview of the rise of unconventional energy, the review examines energy economics and geopolitics, community mobilization, and state and private regulatory responses. Unconventional energy requires different frames of analysis than conventional energy because of three characteristics: increased drilling density, low-carbon and "clean" energy narratives of natural gas, and distinct ownership and royalty structures. This review points to the need for an interdisciplinary approach to analyzing the resulting dynamic, multilevel web of relationships that implicates land, water, food, and climate. Furthermore, the review highlights how scholarship on unconventional energy informs the broader energy landscape and contested energy futures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)241-266
Number of pages26
JournalAnnual Review of Environment and Resources
Volume42
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 17 2017

Fingerprint

economics
energy
interdisciplinary approach
geopolitics
fossil fuel
ownership
mobilization
natural gas
shale
drilling
sand
food
oil
carbon
climate
gas
rock
water

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Neville, K. J., Baka, J., Gamper-Rabindran, S., Bakker, K., Andreasson, S., Vengosh, A., ... Weinthal, E. (2017). Debating Unconventional Energy: Social, Political, and Economic Implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42, 241-266. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061102
Neville, Kate J. ; Baka, Jennifer ; Gamper-Rabindran, Shanti ; Bakker, Karen ; Andreasson, Stefan ; Vengosh, Avner ; Lin, Alvin ; Singh, Jewellord Nem ; Weinthal, Erika. / Debating Unconventional Energy : Social, Political, and Economic Implications. In: Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2017 ; Vol. 42. pp. 241-266.
@article{714022efca184603a662be7332df3a83,
title = "Debating Unconventional Energy: Social, Political, and Economic Implications",
abstract = "The extraction of unconventional oil and gas-from shale rocks, tight sand, and coalbed formations-is shifting the geographies of fossil fuel production, with complex consequences. Following Jackson et al.'s (1) natural science survey of the environmental consequences of hydraulic fracturing, this review examines social science literature on unconventional energy. After an overview of the rise of unconventional energy, the review examines energy economics and geopolitics, community mobilization, and state and private regulatory responses. Unconventional energy requires different frames of analysis than conventional energy because of three characteristics: increased drilling density, low-carbon and {"}clean{"} energy narratives of natural gas, and distinct ownership and royalty structures. This review points to the need for an interdisciplinary approach to analyzing the resulting dynamic, multilevel web of relationships that implicates land, water, food, and climate. Furthermore, the review highlights how scholarship on unconventional energy informs the broader energy landscape and contested energy futures.",
author = "Neville, {Kate J.} and Jennifer Baka and Shanti Gamper-Rabindran and Karen Bakker and Stefan Andreasson and Avner Vengosh and Alvin Lin and Singh, {Jewellord Nem} and Erika Weinthal",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061102",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "241--266",
journal = "Annual Review of Environment and Resources",
issn = "1543-5938",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

Neville, KJ, Baka, J, Gamper-Rabindran, S, Bakker, K, Andreasson, S, Vengosh, A, Lin, A, Singh, JN & Weinthal, E 2017, 'Debating Unconventional Energy: Social, Political, and Economic Implications', Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol. 42, pp. 241-266. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061102

Debating Unconventional Energy : Social, Political, and Economic Implications. / Neville, Kate J.; Baka, Jennifer; Gamper-Rabindran, Shanti; Bakker, Karen; Andreasson, Stefan; Vengosh, Avner; Lin, Alvin; Singh, Jewellord Nem; Weinthal, Erika.

In: Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Vol. 42, 17.10.2017, p. 241-266.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Debating Unconventional Energy

T2 - Social, Political, and Economic Implications

AU - Neville, Kate J.

AU - Baka, Jennifer

AU - Gamper-Rabindran, Shanti

AU - Bakker, Karen

AU - Andreasson, Stefan

AU - Vengosh, Avner

AU - Lin, Alvin

AU - Singh, Jewellord Nem

AU - Weinthal, Erika

PY - 2017/10/17

Y1 - 2017/10/17

N2 - The extraction of unconventional oil and gas-from shale rocks, tight sand, and coalbed formations-is shifting the geographies of fossil fuel production, with complex consequences. Following Jackson et al.'s (1) natural science survey of the environmental consequences of hydraulic fracturing, this review examines social science literature on unconventional energy. After an overview of the rise of unconventional energy, the review examines energy economics and geopolitics, community mobilization, and state and private regulatory responses. Unconventional energy requires different frames of analysis than conventional energy because of three characteristics: increased drilling density, low-carbon and "clean" energy narratives of natural gas, and distinct ownership and royalty structures. This review points to the need for an interdisciplinary approach to analyzing the resulting dynamic, multilevel web of relationships that implicates land, water, food, and climate. Furthermore, the review highlights how scholarship on unconventional energy informs the broader energy landscape and contested energy futures.

AB - The extraction of unconventional oil and gas-from shale rocks, tight sand, and coalbed formations-is shifting the geographies of fossil fuel production, with complex consequences. Following Jackson et al.'s (1) natural science survey of the environmental consequences of hydraulic fracturing, this review examines social science literature on unconventional energy. After an overview of the rise of unconventional energy, the review examines energy economics and geopolitics, community mobilization, and state and private regulatory responses. Unconventional energy requires different frames of analysis than conventional energy because of three characteristics: increased drilling density, low-carbon and "clean" energy narratives of natural gas, and distinct ownership and royalty structures. This review points to the need for an interdisciplinary approach to analyzing the resulting dynamic, multilevel web of relationships that implicates land, water, food, and climate. Furthermore, the review highlights how scholarship on unconventional energy informs the broader energy landscape and contested energy futures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031713692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031713692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061102

DO - 10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061102

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85031713692

VL - 42

SP - 241

EP - 266

JO - Annual Review of Environment and Resources

JF - Annual Review of Environment and Resources

SN - 1543-5938

ER -