Decision Aid to Technologically Enhance Shared decision making (DATES): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Masahito Jimbo, Karen Kelly-Blake, Ananda Sen, Sarah T. Hawley, Mack Ruffin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Clinicians face challenges in promoting colorectal cancer screening due to multiple competing demands. A decision aid that clarifies patient preferences and improves decision quality can aid shared decision making and be effective at increasing colorectal cancer screening rates. However, exactly how such an intervention improves shared decision making is unclear. This study, funded by the National Cancer Institute, seeks to provide detailed understanding of how an interactive decision aid that elicits patient's risks and preferences impacts patient-clinician communication and shared decision making, and ultimately colorectal cancer screening adherence.Methods/Design: This is a two-armed single-blinded randomized controlled trial with the target of 300 patients per arm. The setting is eleven community and three academic primary care practices in Metro Detroit. Patients are men and women aged between 50 and 75 years who are not up to date on colorectal cancer screening. ColoDATES Web (intervention arm), a decision aid that incorporates interactive personal risk assessment and preference clarification tools, is compared to a non-interactive website that matches ColoDATES Web in content but does not contain interactive tools (control arm). Primary outcomes are patient uptake of colorectal cancer screening; patient decision quality (knowledge, preference clarification, intent); clinician's degree of shared decision making; and patient-clinician concordance in the screening test chosen. Secondary outcome incorporates a Structural Equation Modeling approach to understand the mechanism of the causal pathway and test the validity of the proposed conceptual model based on Theory of Planned Behavior. Clinicians and those performing the analysis are blinded to arms.Discussion: The central hypothesis is that ColoDATES Web will improve colorectal cancer screening adherence through improvement in patient behavioral factors, shared decision making between the patient and the clinician, and concordance between the patient's and clinician's preferred colorectal cancer screening test. The results of this study will be among the first to examine the effect of a real-time preference assessment exercise on colorectal cancer screening and mediators, and, in doing so, will shed light on the patient-clinician communication and shared decision making 'black box' that currently exists between the delivery of decision aids to patients and subsequent patient behavior.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01514786.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number381
JournalTrials
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 11 2013

Fingerprint

Decision Support Techniques
Decision Making
Randomized Controlled Trials
Early Detection of Cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms
Patient Preference
Communication
National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
Primary Health Care
Exercise

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Jimbo, Masahito ; Kelly-Blake, Karen ; Sen, Ananda ; Hawley, Sarah T. ; Ruffin, Mack. / Decision Aid to Technologically Enhance Shared decision making (DATES) : Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. In: Trials. 2013 ; Vol. 14, No. 1.
@article{abf67a3956804870a40e346f05d6da25,
title = "Decision Aid to Technologically Enhance Shared decision making (DATES): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Background: Clinicians face challenges in promoting colorectal cancer screening due to multiple competing demands. A decision aid that clarifies patient preferences and improves decision quality can aid shared decision making and be effective at increasing colorectal cancer screening rates. However, exactly how such an intervention improves shared decision making is unclear. This study, funded by the National Cancer Institute, seeks to provide detailed understanding of how an interactive decision aid that elicits patient's risks and preferences impacts patient-clinician communication and shared decision making, and ultimately colorectal cancer screening adherence.Methods/Design: This is a two-armed single-blinded randomized controlled trial with the target of 300 patients per arm. The setting is eleven community and three academic primary care practices in Metro Detroit. Patients are men and women aged between 50 and 75 years who are not up to date on colorectal cancer screening. ColoDATES Web (intervention arm), a decision aid that incorporates interactive personal risk assessment and preference clarification tools, is compared to a non-interactive website that matches ColoDATES Web in content but does not contain interactive tools (control arm). Primary outcomes are patient uptake of colorectal cancer screening; patient decision quality (knowledge, preference clarification, intent); clinician's degree of shared decision making; and patient-clinician concordance in the screening test chosen. Secondary outcome incorporates a Structural Equation Modeling approach to understand the mechanism of the causal pathway and test the validity of the proposed conceptual model based on Theory of Planned Behavior. Clinicians and those performing the analysis are blinded to arms.Discussion: The central hypothesis is that ColoDATES Web will improve colorectal cancer screening adherence through improvement in patient behavioral factors, shared decision making between the patient and the clinician, and concordance between the patient's and clinician's preferred colorectal cancer screening test. The results of this study will be among the first to examine the effect of a real-time preference assessment exercise on colorectal cancer screening and mediators, and, in doing so, will shed light on the patient-clinician communication and shared decision making 'black box' that currently exists between the delivery of decision aids to patients and subsequent patient behavior.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01514786.",
author = "Masahito Jimbo and Karen Kelly-Blake and Ananda Sen and Hawley, {Sarah T.} and Mack Ruffin",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1186/1745-6215-14-381",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
journal = "Trials",
issn = "1745-6215",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

Decision Aid to Technologically Enhance Shared decision making (DATES) : Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. / Jimbo, Masahito; Kelly-Blake, Karen; Sen, Ananda; Hawley, Sarah T.; Ruffin, Mack.

In: Trials, Vol. 14, No. 1, 381, 11.11.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decision Aid to Technologically Enhance Shared decision making (DATES)

T2 - Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

AU - Jimbo, Masahito

AU - Kelly-Blake, Karen

AU - Sen, Ananda

AU - Hawley, Sarah T.

AU - Ruffin, Mack

PY - 2013/11/11

Y1 - 2013/11/11

N2 - Background: Clinicians face challenges in promoting colorectal cancer screening due to multiple competing demands. A decision aid that clarifies patient preferences and improves decision quality can aid shared decision making and be effective at increasing colorectal cancer screening rates. However, exactly how such an intervention improves shared decision making is unclear. This study, funded by the National Cancer Institute, seeks to provide detailed understanding of how an interactive decision aid that elicits patient's risks and preferences impacts patient-clinician communication and shared decision making, and ultimately colorectal cancer screening adherence.Methods/Design: This is a two-armed single-blinded randomized controlled trial with the target of 300 patients per arm. The setting is eleven community and three academic primary care practices in Metro Detroit. Patients are men and women aged between 50 and 75 years who are not up to date on colorectal cancer screening. ColoDATES Web (intervention arm), a decision aid that incorporates interactive personal risk assessment and preference clarification tools, is compared to a non-interactive website that matches ColoDATES Web in content but does not contain interactive tools (control arm). Primary outcomes are patient uptake of colorectal cancer screening; patient decision quality (knowledge, preference clarification, intent); clinician's degree of shared decision making; and patient-clinician concordance in the screening test chosen. Secondary outcome incorporates a Structural Equation Modeling approach to understand the mechanism of the causal pathway and test the validity of the proposed conceptual model based on Theory of Planned Behavior. Clinicians and those performing the analysis are blinded to arms.Discussion: The central hypothesis is that ColoDATES Web will improve colorectal cancer screening adherence through improvement in patient behavioral factors, shared decision making between the patient and the clinician, and concordance between the patient's and clinician's preferred colorectal cancer screening test. The results of this study will be among the first to examine the effect of a real-time preference assessment exercise on colorectal cancer screening and mediators, and, in doing so, will shed light on the patient-clinician communication and shared decision making 'black box' that currently exists between the delivery of decision aids to patients and subsequent patient behavior.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01514786.

AB - Background: Clinicians face challenges in promoting colorectal cancer screening due to multiple competing demands. A decision aid that clarifies patient preferences and improves decision quality can aid shared decision making and be effective at increasing colorectal cancer screening rates. However, exactly how such an intervention improves shared decision making is unclear. This study, funded by the National Cancer Institute, seeks to provide detailed understanding of how an interactive decision aid that elicits patient's risks and preferences impacts patient-clinician communication and shared decision making, and ultimately colorectal cancer screening adherence.Methods/Design: This is a two-armed single-blinded randomized controlled trial with the target of 300 patients per arm. The setting is eleven community and three academic primary care practices in Metro Detroit. Patients are men and women aged between 50 and 75 years who are not up to date on colorectal cancer screening. ColoDATES Web (intervention arm), a decision aid that incorporates interactive personal risk assessment and preference clarification tools, is compared to a non-interactive website that matches ColoDATES Web in content but does not contain interactive tools (control arm). Primary outcomes are patient uptake of colorectal cancer screening; patient decision quality (knowledge, preference clarification, intent); clinician's degree of shared decision making; and patient-clinician concordance in the screening test chosen. Secondary outcome incorporates a Structural Equation Modeling approach to understand the mechanism of the causal pathway and test the validity of the proposed conceptual model based on Theory of Planned Behavior. Clinicians and those performing the analysis are blinded to arms.Discussion: The central hypothesis is that ColoDATES Web will improve colorectal cancer screening adherence through improvement in patient behavioral factors, shared decision making between the patient and the clinician, and concordance between the patient's and clinician's preferred colorectal cancer screening test. The results of this study will be among the first to examine the effect of a real-time preference assessment exercise on colorectal cancer screening and mediators, and, in doing so, will shed light on the patient-clinician communication and shared decision making 'black box' that currently exists between the delivery of decision aids to patients and subsequent patient behavior.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01514786.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887199016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887199016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1745-6215-14-381

DO - 10.1186/1745-6215-14-381

M3 - Article

C2 - 24216139

AN - SCOPUS:84887199016

VL - 14

JO - Trials

JF - Trials

SN - 1745-6215

IS - 1

M1 - 381

ER -