Decision making in academia: A case of the dean selection process

Ray Gibney, Jennifer Shang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study describes the use of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in the dean selection process. A subcommittee of the dean search task force created an order-ranking based upon group discussions as well as through the application of the AHP. The results of the two processes were compared against the Provost's final decision. Discrepancies were analyzed and explained. The results suggest that root cause of the differences was a variation in emphasis on certain criteria. The authors conclude that AHP is a valuable tool and should be incorporated into personnel selection processes in academia. The AHP provides a convenient and effective tool for evaluating personnel. Fears that it might prove overly complex or difficult for non-technical people to use proved to be unfounded.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1030-1040
Number of pages11
JournalMathematical and Computer Modelling
Volume46
Issue number7-8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2007

Fingerprint

Analytical Hierarchy Process
Personnel selection
Decision making
Decision Making
Personnel
Discrepancy
Ranking
Roots

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

@article{1dada6ca1f3649fe8a50550b818f628d,
title = "Decision making in academia: A case of the dean selection process",
abstract = "This study describes the use of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in the dean selection process. A subcommittee of the dean search task force created an order-ranking based upon group discussions as well as through the application of the AHP. The results of the two processes were compared against the Provost's final decision. Discrepancies were analyzed and explained. The results suggest that root cause of the differences was a variation in emphasis on certain criteria. The authors conclude that AHP is a valuable tool and should be incorporated into personnel selection processes in academia. The AHP provides a convenient and effective tool for evaluating personnel. Fears that it might prove overly complex or difficult for non-technical people to use proved to be unfounded.",
author = "Ray Gibney and Jennifer Shang",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "1030--1040",
journal = "Mathematical and Computer Modelling",
issn = "0895-7177",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "7-8",

}

Decision making in academia : A case of the dean selection process. / Gibney, Ray; Shang, Jennifer.

In: Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 46, No. 7-8, 01.10.2007, p. 1030-1040.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decision making in academia

T2 - A case of the dean selection process

AU - Gibney, Ray

AU - Shang, Jennifer

PY - 2007/10/1

Y1 - 2007/10/1

N2 - This study describes the use of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in the dean selection process. A subcommittee of the dean search task force created an order-ranking based upon group discussions as well as through the application of the AHP. The results of the two processes were compared against the Provost's final decision. Discrepancies were analyzed and explained. The results suggest that root cause of the differences was a variation in emphasis on certain criteria. The authors conclude that AHP is a valuable tool and should be incorporated into personnel selection processes in academia. The AHP provides a convenient and effective tool for evaluating personnel. Fears that it might prove overly complex or difficult for non-technical people to use proved to be unfounded.

AB - This study describes the use of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in the dean selection process. A subcommittee of the dean search task force created an order-ranking based upon group discussions as well as through the application of the AHP. The results of the two processes were compared against the Provost's final decision. Discrepancies were analyzed and explained. The results suggest that root cause of the differences was a variation in emphasis on certain criteria. The authors conclude that AHP is a valuable tool and should be incorporated into personnel selection processes in academia. The AHP provides a convenient and effective tool for evaluating personnel. Fears that it might prove overly complex or difficult for non-technical people to use proved to be unfounded.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548127684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548127684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.024

DO - 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.024

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34548127684

VL - 46

SP - 1030

EP - 1040

JO - Mathematical and Computer Modelling

JF - Mathematical and Computer Modelling

SN - 0895-7177

IS - 7-8

ER -