TY - JOUR
T1 - Defining Cultural Resources
T2 - A Case Study from the Mid-Atlantic United States
AU - Brown, Madeline
AU - Murtha, Timothy
AU - Schroder, Whittaker
AU - Wang, Luwei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the Society for Applied Anthropology.
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Integrating cultural and natural resources for large landscape conservation remains an applied challenge for landscape planners and resource managers across North America. When resources are considered at a regional scale, developing shared priorities, definitions, and metrics is an essential but complex process for successful conservation partnerships. Strategies exist for designing regional conservation models for natural resources, but methods for cultural resource conservation planning often remain focused on individual sites and buildings. Here, we build on our previous work with the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives to advance frameworks and spatial models for regionally integrated natural and cultural resource conservation design and planning. Specifically, we present the results of our survey of cultural resource specialists in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States to better understand how cultural resources are defined, classified, and valued by this group. Methods from applied cognitive anthropology are useful for uncovering cultural consensus and more marginalized perspectives around resource management priorities, offering a clear pathway for integrating cultural and natural resource conservation. We conclude by restating a call for a National GAP-like research program for cultural resources that integrates diverse cultural practices, perspectives, histories, and values of communities for designing future conservation priorities.
AB - Integrating cultural and natural resources for large landscape conservation remains an applied challenge for landscape planners and resource managers across North America. When resources are considered at a regional scale, developing shared priorities, definitions, and metrics is an essential but complex process for successful conservation partnerships. Strategies exist for designing regional conservation models for natural resources, but methods for cultural resource conservation planning often remain focused on individual sites and buildings. Here, we build on our previous work with the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives to advance frameworks and spatial models for regionally integrated natural and cultural resource conservation design and planning. Specifically, we present the results of our survey of cultural resource specialists in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States to better understand how cultural resources are defined, classified, and valued by this group. Methods from applied cognitive anthropology are useful for uncovering cultural consensus and more marginalized perspectives around resource management priorities, offering a clear pathway for integrating cultural and natural resource conservation. We conclude by restating a call for a National GAP-like research program for cultural resources that integrates diverse cultural practices, perspectives, histories, and values of communities for designing future conservation priorities.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125584685&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125584685&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.17730/1938-3525-81.1.47
DO - 10.17730/1938-3525-81.1.47
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85125584685
SN - 1938-3517
VL - 81
SP - 47
EP - 59
JO - Human Organization
JF - Human Organization
IS - 1
ER -