Defining Genes Using "Blueprint" Versus "Instruction" Metaphors: Effects for Genetic Determinism, Response Efficacy, and Perceived Control

Roxanne Parrott, Rachel Annette Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence supports mixed attributions aligned with personal and/or clinical control and gene expression for health in this era of genomic science and health care. We consider variance in these attributions and possible relationships to individual mind sets associated with essentialist beliefs that genes determine health versus threat beliefs that genes increase susceptibility for disease and severity linked to gene-environment interactions. Further, we contribute to theory and empirical research to evaluate the use of metaphors to define genes. Participants (N = 324) read a message that varied the introduction by providing a definition of genes that used either an "instruction" metaphor or a "blueprint" metaphor. The "instruction" metaphor compared to the "blueprint" metaphor promoted stronger threat perceptions, which aligned with both belief in the response efficacy of genetic research for health and perceived behavioral control linked to genes and health. The "blueprint" metaphor compared to the "instruction" metaphor promoted stronger essentialist beliefs, which aligned with more intense positive regard for the efficacy of genetic research and human health. Implications for health communicators include societal effects aligned with stigma and discrimination that such findings portend.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)137-146
Number of pages10
JournalHealth Communication
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Genetic Determinism
Blueprints
Metaphor
determinism
metaphor
Genes
Health
instruction
health
genetic research
Genetic Research
attribution
threat
Gene-Environment Interaction
Empirical Research
Health care
communicator
Gene expression
Disease Susceptibility
empirical research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Communication

Cite this

@article{956f53d773e94852b5224b835ef8cf46,
title = "Defining Genes Using {"}Blueprint{"} Versus {"}Instruction{"} Metaphors: Effects for Genetic Determinism, Response Efficacy, and Perceived Control",
abstract = "Evidence supports mixed attributions aligned with personal and/or clinical control and gene expression for health in this era of genomic science and health care. We consider variance in these attributions and possible relationships to individual mind sets associated with essentialist beliefs that genes determine health versus threat beliefs that genes increase susceptibility for disease and severity linked to gene-environment interactions. Further, we contribute to theory and empirical research to evaluate the use of metaphors to define genes. Participants (N = 324) read a message that varied the introduction by providing a definition of genes that used either an {"}instruction{"} metaphor or a {"}blueprint{"} metaphor. The {"}instruction{"} metaphor compared to the {"}blueprint{"} metaphor promoted stronger threat perceptions, which aligned with both belief in the response efficacy of genetic research for health and perceived behavioral control linked to genes and health. The {"}blueprint{"} metaphor compared to the {"}instruction{"} metaphor promoted stronger essentialist beliefs, which aligned with more intense positive regard for the efficacy of genetic research and human health. Implications for health communicators include societal effects aligned with stigma and discrimination that such findings portend.",
author = "Roxanne Parrott and Smith, {Rachel Annette}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10410236.2012.729181",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "137--146",
journal = "Health Communication",
issn = "1041-0236",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining Genes Using "Blueprint" Versus "Instruction" Metaphors

T2 - Effects for Genetic Determinism, Response Efficacy, and Perceived Control

AU - Parrott, Roxanne

AU - Smith, Rachel Annette

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Evidence supports mixed attributions aligned with personal and/or clinical control and gene expression for health in this era of genomic science and health care. We consider variance in these attributions and possible relationships to individual mind sets associated with essentialist beliefs that genes determine health versus threat beliefs that genes increase susceptibility for disease and severity linked to gene-environment interactions. Further, we contribute to theory and empirical research to evaluate the use of metaphors to define genes. Participants (N = 324) read a message that varied the introduction by providing a definition of genes that used either an "instruction" metaphor or a "blueprint" metaphor. The "instruction" metaphor compared to the "blueprint" metaphor promoted stronger threat perceptions, which aligned with both belief in the response efficacy of genetic research for health and perceived behavioral control linked to genes and health. The "blueprint" metaphor compared to the "instruction" metaphor promoted stronger essentialist beliefs, which aligned with more intense positive regard for the efficacy of genetic research and human health. Implications for health communicators include societal effects aligned with stigma and discrimination that such findings portend.

AB - Evidence supports mixed attributions aligned with personal and/or clinical control and gene expression for health in this era of genomic science and health care. We consider variance in these attributions and possible relationships to individual mind sets associated with essentialist beliefs that genes determine health versus threat beliefs that genes increase susceptibility for disease and severity linked to gene-environment interactions. Further, we contribute to theory and empirical research to evaluate the use of metaphors to define genes. Participants (N = 324) read a message that varied the introduction by providing a definition of genes that used either an "instruction" metaphor or a "blueprint" metaphor. The "instruction" metaphor compared to the "blueprint" metaphor promoted stronger threat perceptions, which aligned with both belief in the response efficacy of genetic research for health and perceived behavioral control linked to genes and health. The "blueprint" metaphor compared to the "instruction" metaphor promoted stronger essentialist beliefs, which aligned with more intense positive regard for the efficacy of genetic research and human health. Implications for health communicators include societal effects aligned with stigma and discrimination that such findings portend.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890123316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890123316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10410236.2012.729181

DO - 10.1080/10410236.2012.729181

M3 - Article

C2 - 23448621

AN - SCOPUS:84890123316

VL - 29

SP - 137

EP - 146

JO - Health Communication

JF - Health Communication

SN - 1041-0236

IS - 2

ER -