Dehydration among lactating mothers in the Amazon

A neglected problem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare hydration status between lactating and non-lactating women in the hot-humid Amazon. Methods: Fifty-four women (15-81 years) from two villages at different distances to the market provided urine samples, anthropometric measurements, and health recalls. Urine samples were analyzed for urine specific gravity (USG). Bivariate and multiple linear and logistic regressions tested differences in USG and dehydration (USG > 1.020) between women of different lactating status. Results: Lactating women (1.024 g/ml; 78% dehydrated) had significantly higher USG levels (β = 0.004; P = 0.011) than non-lactating women (1.020 g/ml; 50% dehydrated) and were significantly more likely to be dehydrated adjusting for covariates (OR: 4.05; 95% CI 1.1-14.7). Conclusions: Women living in hot-humid rural environments with minimal access to clean water are at greater risk of dehydration when breastfeeding. Future research should examine lactating women longitudinally and assess whether chronic dehydration affects breast milk composition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)576-578
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Human Biology
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Dehydration
dehydration
urine
Mothers
Specific Gravity
specific gravity
lactating women
Urine
gravity
breastfeeding
breast feeding
breast milk
anthropometric measurements
milk composition
Human Milk
woman
villages
Breast Feeding
hydration
Linear Models

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anatomy
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Anthropology
  • Genetics

Cite this

@article{b413400bf322412da32c0ddbade5f94e,
title = "Dehydration among lactating mothers in the Amazon: A neglected problem",
abstract = "Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare hydration status between lactating and non-lactating women in the hot-humid Amazon. Methods: Fifty-four women (15-81 years) from two villages at different distances to the market provided urine samples, anthropometric measurements, and health recalls. Urine samples were analyzed for urine specific gravity (USG). Bivariate and multiple linear and logistic regressions tested differences in USG and dehydration (USG > 1.020) between women of different lactating status. Results: Lactating women (1.024 g/ml; 78{\%} dehydrated) had significantly higher USG levels (β = 0.004; P = 0.011) than non-lactating women (1.020 g/ml; 50{\%} dehydrated) and were significantly more likely to be dehydrated adjusting for covariates (OR: 4.05; 95{\%} CI 1.1-14.7). Conclusions: Women living in hot-humid rural environments with minimal access to clean water are at greater risk of dehydration when breastfeeding. Future research should examine lactating women longitudinally and assess whether chronic dehydration affects breast milk composition.",
author = "Asher Rosinger",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ajhb.22672",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "576--578",
journal = "American Journal of Human Biology",
issn = "1042-0533",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Dehydration among lactating mothers in the Amazon : A neglected problem. / Rosinger, Asher.

In: American Journal of Human Biology, Vol. 27, No. 4, 01.01.2015, p. 576-578.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dehydration among lactating mothers in the Amazon

T2 - A neglected problem

AU - Rosinger, Asher

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare hydration status between lactating and non-lactating women in the hot-humid Amazon. Methods: Fifty-four women (15-81 years) from two villages at different distances to the market provided urine samples, anthropometric measurements, and health recalls. Urine samples were analyzed for urine specific gravity (USG). Bivariate and multiple linear and logistic regressions tested differences in USG and dehydration (USG > 1.020) between women of different lactating status. Results: Lactating women (1.024 g/ml; 78% dehydrated) had significantly higher USG levels (β = 0.004; P = 0.011) than non-lactating women (1.020 g/ml; 50% dehydrated) and were significantly more likely to be dehydrated adjusting for covariates (OR: 4.05; 95% CI 1.1-14.7). Conclusions: Women living in hot-humid rural environments with minimal access to clean water are at greater risk of dehydration when breastfeeding. Future research should examine lactating women longitudinally and assess whether chronic dehydration affects breast milk composition.

AB - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare hydration status between lactating and non-lactating women in the hot-humid Amazon. Methods: Fifty-four women (15-81 years) from two villages at different distances to the market provided urine samples, anthropometric measurements, and health recalls. Urine samples were analyzed for urine specific gravity (USG). Bivariate and multiple linear and logistic regressions tested differences in USG and dehydration (USG > 1.020) between women of different lactating status. Results: Lactating women (1.024 g/ml; 78% dehydrated) had significantly higher USG levels (β = 0.004; P = 0.011) than non-lactating women (1.020 g/ml; 50% dehydrated) and were significantly more likely to be dehydrated adjusting for covariates (OR: 4.05; 95% CI 1.1-14.7). Conclusions: Women living in hot-humid rural environments with minimal access to clean water are at greater risk of dehydration when breastfeeding. Future research should examine lactating women longitudinally and assess whether chronic dehydration affects breast milk composition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931566253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931566253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ajhb.22672

DO - 10.1002/ajhb.22672

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 576

EP - 578

JO - American Journal of Human Biology

JF - American Journal of Human Biology

SN - 1042-0533

IS - 4

ER -