Deleuze and the meaning of life

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Life did not exist In The Order of Things Foucault makes the claim that until the eighteenth century ‘life did not exist’ (Foucault 1994: 128). The concept of life was not one concept among others but allowed for the construction of a new plane or ‘historical a priori’. If man had been, as Foucault notes, a political animal this was because his humanity was created through the social relations he established through speech and action. When ‘man’ becomes an epiphenomenon of life then his political being is no longer constitutive of who he is; rather his political being might now be explained by reference back to certain exigencies of life. Man speaks and works because he must live. All those seemingly radical movements of the twentieth century such as structuralism, anthropology, psychoanalysis, phenomenology and late Marxism are normalising reterritorialisations: man's being can now be explained and managed according to the exigencies of life from which he emerges. If Deleuze affirms Foucault's capacity for diagrams and relations he also distinguishes his own concept of desire from Foucault's concept of power. Foucault had argued that the late nineteenth-century discourses of life, labour and language could be transformed when literature no longer appeared as emerging from life. Literature would disclose a divergent, multiple and machinic logic no longer governed by a vital impulse (Deleuze 1988: 131). But, Deleuze argues, we can also discern these forces of the outside in transformed discourses of life.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationDeleuze and Philosophy
PublisherEdinburgh University Press
Pages121-132
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)9780748627196
ISBN (Print)9780748624799
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

Meaning of Life
Gilles Deleuze
Discourse
Structuralism
Diagrams
Social Relations
Labor
Marxism
Anthropology
Phenomenology
Impulse
Psychoanalysis
Language
Logic
Animals
Order of Things

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Colebrook, C. (2005). Deleuze and the meaning of life. In Deleuze and Philosophy (pp. 121-132). Edinburgh University Press.
Colebrook, Claire. / Deleuze and the meaning of life. Deleuze and Philosophy. Edinburgh University Press, 2005. pp. 121-132
@inbook{99b29fbe4dd149ba9fb7599f03f43a76,
title = "Deleuze and the meaning of life",
abstract = "Life did not exist In The Order of Things Foucault makes the claim that until the eighteenth century ‘life did not exist’ (Foucault 1994: 128). The concept of life was not one concept among others but allowed for the construction of a new plane or ‘historical a priori’. If man had been, as Foucault notes, a political animal this was because his humanity was created through the social relations he established through speech and action. When ‘man’ becomes an epiphenomenon of life then his political being is no longer constitutive of who he is; rather his political being might now be explained by reference back to certain exigencies of life. Man speaks and works because he must live. All those seemingly radical movements of the twentieth century such as structuralism, anthropology, psychoanalysis, phenomenology and late Marxism are normalising reterritorialisations: man's being can now be explained and managed according to the exigencies of life from which he emerges. If Deleuze affirms Foucault's capacity for diagrams and relations he also distinguishes his own concept of desire from Foucault's concept of power. Foucault had argued that the late nineteenth-century discourses of life, labour and language could be transformed when literature no longer appeared as emerging from life. Literature would disclose a divergent, multiple and machinic logic no longer governed by a vital impulse (Deleuze 1988: 131). But, Deleuze argues, we can also discern these forces of the outside in transformed discourses of life.",
author = "Claire Colebrook",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780748624799",
pages = "121--132",
booktitle = "Deleuze and Philosophy",
publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Colebrook, C 2005, Deleuze and the meaning of life. in Deleuze and Philosophy. Edinburgh University Press, pp. 121-132.

Deleuze and the meaning of life. / Colebrook, Claire.

Deleuze and Philosophy. Edinburgh University Press, 2005. p. 121-132.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Deleuze and the meaning of life

AU - Colebrook, Claire

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - Life did not exist In The Order of Things Foucault makes the claim that until the eighteenth century ‘life did not exist’ (Foucault 1994: 128). The concept of life was not one concept among others but allowed for the construction of a new plane or ‘historical a priori’. If man had been, as Foucault notes, a political animal this was because his humanity was created through the social relations he established through speech and action. When ‘man’ becomes an epiphenomenon of life then his political being is no longer constitutive of who he is; rather his political being might now be explained by reference back to certain exigencies of life. Man speaks and works because he must live. All those seemingly radical movements of the twentieth century such as structuralism, anthropology, psychoanalysis, phenomenology and late Marxism are normalising reterritorialisations: man's being can now be explained and managed according to the exigencies of life from which he emerges. If Deleuze affirms Foucault's capacity for diagrams and relations he also distinguishes his own concept of desire from Foucault's concept of power. Foucault had argued that the late nineteenth-century discourses of life, labour and language could be transformed when literature no longer appeared as emerging from life. Literature would disclose a divergent, multiple and machinic logic no longer governed by a vital impulse (Deleuze 1988: 131). But, Deleuze argues, we can also discern these forces of the outside in transformed discourses of life.

AB - Life did not exist In The Order of Things Foucault makes the claim that until the eighteenth century ‘life did not exist’ (Foucault 1994: 128). The concept of life was not one concept among others but allowed for the construction of a new plane or ‘historical a priori’. If man had been, as Foucault notes, a political animal this was because his humanity was created through the social relations he established through speech and action. When ‘man’ becomes an epiphenomenon of life then his political being is no longer constitutive of who he is; rather his political being might now be explained by reference back to certain exigencies of life. Man speaks and works because he must live. All those seemingly radical movements of the twentieth century such as structuralism, anthropology, psychoanalysis, phenomenology and late Marxism are normalising reterritorialisations: man's being can now be explained and managed according to the exigencies of life from which he emerges. If Deleuze affirms Foucault's capacity for diagrams and relations he also distinguishes his own concept of desire from Foucault's concept of power. Foucault had argued that the late nineteenth-century discourses of life, labour and language could be transformed when literature no longer appeared as emerging from life. Literature would disclose a divergent, multiple and machinic logic no longer governed by a vital impulse (Deleuze 1988: 131). But, Deleuze argues, we can also discern these forces of the outside in transformed discourses of life.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896428214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896428214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780748624799

SP - 121

EP - 132

BT - Deleuze and Philosophy

PB - Edinburgh University Press

ER -

Colebrook C. Deleuze and the meaning of life. In Deleuze and Philosophy. Edinburgh University Press. 2005. p. 121-132