Deliberation and Global Criminal Justice

Juries in the International Criminal Court

John W. Gastil, Colin J. Lingle, Eugene P. Deess

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The jury system is one of the oldest deliberative democratic bodies, and it has a robust historical record spanning hundreds of years in numerous countries. As scholars and civic reformers envision a democratic global public sphere and international institutions, we advocate for the inclusion of juries of lay citizens as a means of administering justice and promoting deliberative norms. Focusing specifically on the case of the International Criminal Court, we show how juries could bolster that institution's legitimacy by promoting public trust, increasing procedural fairness, foregrounding deliberative reasoning, and embodying democratic values. Juries would present novel logistical, philosophical, and legal problems, but we show how each of these might be overcome to make juries a viable element of global governance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)69-90
Number of pages22
JournalEthics and International Affairs
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

International Criminal Court
deliberation
justice
global governance
fairness
legitimacy
inclusion
citizen
present
Values
Deliberation
Criminal Justice
Juries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{140df119e7d64e9fb2b5922967cd84eb,
title = "Deliberation and Global Criminal Justice: Juries in the International Criminal Court",
abstract = "The jury system is one of the oldest deliberative democratic bodies, and it has a robust historical record spanning hundreds of years in numerous countries. As scholars and civic reformers envision a democratic global public sphere and international institutions, we advocate for the inclusion of juries of lay citizens as a means of administering justice and promoting deliberative norms. Focusing specifically on the case of the International Criminal Court, we show how juries could bolster that institution's legitimacy by promoting public trust, increasing procedural fairness, foregrounding deliberative reasoning, and embodying democratic values. Juries would present novel logistical, philosophical, and legal problems, but we show how each of these might be overcome to make juries a viable element of global governance.",
author = "Gastil, {John W.} and Lingle, {Colin J.} and Deess, {Eugene P.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1747-7093.2010.00244.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "69--90",
journal = "Ethics and International Affairs",
issn = "0892-6794",
publisher = "Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs",
number = "1",

}

Deliberation and Global Criminal Justice : Juries in the International Criminal Court. / Gastil, John W.; Lingle, Colin J.; Deess, Eugene P.

In: Ethics and International Affairs, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 69-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deliberation and Global Criminal Justice

T2 - Juries in the International Criminal Court

AU - Gastil, John W.

AU - Lingle, Colin J.

AU - Deess, Eugene P.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - The jury system is one of the oldest deliberative democratic bodies, and it has a robust historical record spanning hundreds of years in numerous countries. As scholars and civic reformers envision a democratic global public sphere and international institutions, we advocate for the inclusion of juries of lay citizens as a means of administering justice and promoting deliberative norms. Focusing specifically on the case of the International Criminal Court, we show how juries could bolster that institution's legitimacy by promoting public trust, increasing procedural fairness, foregrounding deliberative reasoning, and embodying democratic values. Juries would present novel logistical, philosophical, and legal problems, but we show how each of these might be overcome to make juries a viable element of global governance.

AB - The jury system is one of the oldest deliberative democratic bodies, and it has a robust historical record spanning hundreds of years in numerous countries. As scholars and civic reformers envision a democratic global public sphere and international institutions, we advocate for the inclusion of juries of lay citizens as a means of administering justice and promoting deliberative norms. Focusing specifically on the case of the International Criminal Court, we show how juries could bolster that institution's legitimacy by promoting public trust, increasing procedural fairness, foregrounding deliberative reasoning, and embodying democratic values. Juries would present novel logistical, philosophical, and legal problems, but we show how each of these might be overcome to make juries a viable element of global governance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956228959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956228959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2010.00244.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2010.00244.x

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 69

EP - 90

JO - Ethics and International Affairs

JF - Ethics and International Affairs

SN - 0892-6794

IS - 1

ER -