Delinquency And The Structure Of Adolescent Peer Groups

Derek Allen Kreager, Kelly Rulison, James Moody

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Gangs and group-level processes were once central phenomena for criminological theory and research. By the mid-1970s, however, gang research primarily was displaced by studies of individual behavior using randomized self-report surveys, a shift that also removed groups from the theoretical foreground. In this project, we return to the group level to test competing theoretical claims about delinquent group structure. We use network-based clustering methods to identify 897 friendship groups in two ninth-grade cohorts of 27 Pennsylvania and Iowa schools. We then relate group-level measures of delinquency and drinking to network measures of group size, friendship reciprocity, transitivity, structural cohesion, stability, average popularity, and network centrality. We find significant negative correlations between group delinquency and all of our network measures, suggesting that delinquent groups are less solidary and less central to school networks than nondelinquent groups. Additional analyses, on the one hand, reveal that these correlations are explained primarily by other group characteristics, such as gender composition and socioeconomic status. Drinking behaviors, on the other hand, show net positive associations with most of the network measures, suggesting that drinking groups have a higher status and are more internally cohesive than nondrinking groups. Our findings shed light on a long-standing criminological debate by suggesting that any structural differences between delinquent and nondelinquent groups are likely attributable to other characteristics coincidental with delinquency. In contrast, drinking groups seem to provide peer contexts of greater social capital and cohesion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-127
Number of pages33
JournalCriminology
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2011

Fingerprint

Peer Group
peer group
delinquency
Drinking
adolescent
Group Structure
Drinking Behavior
Group Processes
Group
Research
Social Class
Self Report
Cluster Analysis
friendship group
group size
social cohesion
reciprocity
group cohesion
friendship
school

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Kreager, Derek Allen ; Rulison, Kelly ; Moody, James. / Delinquency And The Structure Of Adolescent Peer Groups. In: Criminology. 2011 ; Vol. 49, No. 1. pp. 95-127.
@article{985229e9c9064e8f8e9f0768ddd4994e,
title = "Delinquency And The Structure Of Adolescent Peer Groups",
abstract = "Gangs and group-level processes were once central phenomena for criminological theory and research. By the mid-1970s, however, gang research primarily was displaced by studies of individual behavior using randomized self-report surveys, a shift that also removed groups from the theoretical foreground. In this project, we return to the group level to test competing theoretical claims about delinquent group structure. We use network-based clustering methods to identify 897 friendship groups in two ninth-grade cohorts of 27 Pennsylvania and Iowa schools. We then relate group-level measures of delinquency and drinking to network measures of group size, friendship reciprocity, transitivity, structural cohesion, stability, average popularity, and network centrality. We find significant negative correlations between group delinquency and all of our network measures, suggesting that delinquent groups are less solidary and less central to school networks than nondelinquent groups. Additional analyses, on the one hand, reveal that these correlations are explained primarily by other group characteristics, such as gender composition and socioeconomic status. Drinking behaviors, on the other hand, show net positive associations with most of the network measures, suggesting that drinking groups have a higher status and are more internally cohesive than nondrinking groups. Our findings shed light on a long-standing criminological debate by suggesting that any structural differences between delinquent and nondelinquent groups are likely attributable to other characteristics coincidental with delinquency. In contrast, drinking groups seem to provide peer contexts of greater social capital and cohesion.",
author = "Kreager, {Derek Allen} and Kelly Rulison and James Moody",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00219.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "95--127",
journal = "Criminology",
issn = "0011-1384",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Delinquency And The Structure Of Adolescent Peer Groups. / Kreager, Derek Allen; Rulison, Kelly; Moody, James.

In: Criminology, Vol. 49, No. 1, 01.02.2011, p. 95-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Delinquency And The Structure Of Adolescent Peer Groups

AU - Kreager, Derek Allen

AU - Rulison, Kelly

AU - Moody, James

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - Gangs and group-level processes were once central phenomena for criminological theory and research. By the mid-1970s, however, gang research primarily was displaced by studies of individual behavior using randomized self-report surveys, a shift that also removed groups from the theoretical foreground. In this project, we return to the group level to test competing theoretical claims about delinquent group structure. We use network-based clustering methods to identify 897 friendship groups in two ninth-grade cohorts of 27 Pennsylvania and Iowa schools. We then relate group-level measures of delinquency and drinking to network measures of group size, friendship reciprocity, transitivity, structural cohesion, stability, average popularity, and network centrality. We find significant negative correlations between group delinquency and all of our network measures, suggesting that delinquent groups are less solidary and less central to school networks than nondelinquent groups. Additional analyses, on the one hand, reveal that these correlations are explained primarily by other group characteristics, such as gender composition and socioeconomic status. Drinking behaviors, on the other hand, show net positive associations with most of the network measures, suggesting that drinking groups have a higher status and are more internally cohesive than nondrinking groups. Our findings shed light on a long-standing criminological debate by suggesting that any structural differences between delinquent and nondelinquent groups are likely attributable to other characteristics coincidental with delinquency. In contrast, drinking groups seem to provide peer contexts of greater social capital and cohesion.

AB - Gangs and group-level processes were once central phenomena for criminological theory and research. By the mid-1970s, however, gang research primarily was displaced by studies of individual behavior using randomized self-report surveys, a shift that also removed groups from the theoretical foreground. In this project, we return to the group level to test competing theoretical claims about delinquent group structure. We use network-based clustering methods to identify 897 friendship groups in two ninth-grade cohorts of 27 Pennsylvania and Iowa schools. We then relate group-level measures of delinquency and drinking to network measures of group size, friendship reciprocity, transitivity, structural cohesion, stability, average popularity, and network centrality. We find significant negative correlations between group delinquency and all of our network measures, suggesting that delinquent groups are less solidary and less central to school networks than nondelinquent groups. Additional analyses, on the one hand, reveal that these correlations are explained primarily by other group characteristics, such as gender composition and socioeconomic status. Drinking behaviors, on the other hand, show net positive associations with most of the network measures, suggesting that drinking groups have a higher status and are more internally cohesive than nondrinking groups. Our findings shed light on a long-standing criminological debate by suggesting that any structural differences between delinquent and nondelinquent groups are likely attributable to other characteristics coincidental with delinquency. In contrast, drinking groups seem to provide peer contexts of greater social capital and cohesion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951863965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951863965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00219.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00219.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79951863965

VL - 49

SP - 95

EP - 127

JO - Criminology

JF - Criminology

SN - 0011-1384

IS - 1

ER -