Demagnetization protocols for frustrated interacting nanomagnet arrays

R. F. Wang, J. Li, W. McConville, C. Nisoli, X. Ke, J. W. Freeland, V. Rose, M. Grimsditch, Paul Edward Lammert, Vincent Henry Crespi, P. Schiffer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We report a study of demagnetization protocols for frustrated arrays of interacting single-domain permalloy nanomagnets by rotating the arrays in a changing magnetic field. The most effective demagnetization is achieved by not only stepping the field strength down while the sample is rotating, but also by combining each field step with alternation in the field direction. By contrast, linearly decreasing the field strength or stepping the field down without alternating the field direction leaves the arrays with a larger remanent magnetic moment. These results suggest that nonmonotonic variations in field magnitude around and below the coercive field are important for the demagnetization process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number09J104
JournalJournal of Applied Physics
Volume101
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - May 21 2007

Fingerprint

demagnetization
field strength
Permalloys (trademark)
alternations
leaves
magnetic moments
magnetic fields

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Wang, R. F., Li, J., McConville, W., Nisoli, C., Ke, X., Freeland, J. W., ... Schiffer, P. (2007). Demagnetization protocols for frustrated interacting nanomagnet arrays. Journal of Applied Physics, 101(9), [09J104]. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2712528
Wang, R. F. ; Li, J. ; McConville, W. ; Nisoli, C. ; Ke, X. ; Freeland, J. W. ; Rose, V. ; Grimsditch, M. ; Lammert, Paul Edward ; Crespi, Vincent Henry ; Schiffer, P. / Demagnetization protocols for frustrated interacting nanomagnet arrays. In: Journal of Applied Physics. 2007 ; Vol. 101, No. 9.
@article{24f926ca3ea44c259e97db5167372aa0,
title = "Demagnetization protocols for frustrated interacting nanomagnet arrays",
abstract = "We report a study of demagnetization protocols for frustrated arrays of interacting single-domain permalloy nanomagnets by rotating the arrays in a changing magnetic field. The most effective demagnetization is achieved by not only stepping the field strength down while the sample is rotating, but also by combining each field step with alternation in the field direction. By contrast, linearly decreasing the field strength or stepping the field down without alternating the field direction leaves the arrays with a larger remanent magnetic moment. These results suggest that nonmonotonic variations in field magnitude around and below the coercive field are important for the demagnetization process.",
author = "Wang, {R. F.} and J. Li and W. McConville and C. Nisoli and X. Ke and Freeland, {J. W.} and V. Rose and M. Grimsditch and Lammert, {Paul Edward} and Crespi, {Vincent Henry} and P. Schiffer",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1063/1.2712528",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
journal = "Journal of Applied Physics",
issn = "0021-8979",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "9",

}

Wang, RF, Li, J, McConville, W, Nisoli, C, Ke, X, Freeland, JW, Rose, V, Grimsditch, M, Lammert, PE, Crespi, VH & Schiffer, P 2007, 'Demagnetization protocols for frustrated interacting nanomagnet arrays', Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 101, no. 9, 09J104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2712528

Demagnetization protocols for frustrated interacting nanomagnet arrays. / Wang, R. F.; Li, J.; McConville, W.; Nisoli, C.; Ke, X.; Freeland, J. W.; Rose, V.; Grimsditch, M.; Lammert, Paul Edward; Crespi, Vincent Henry; Schiffer, P.

In: Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 101, No. 9, 09J104, 21.05.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Demagnetization protocols for frustrated interacting nanomagnet arrays

AU - Wang, R. F.

AU - Li, J.

AU - McConville, W.

AU - Nisoli, C.

AU - Ke, X.

AU - Freeland, J. W.

AU - Rose, V.

AU - Grimsditch, M.

AU - Lammert, Paul Edward

AU - Crespi, Vincent Henry

AU - Schiffer, P.

PY - 2007/5/21

Y1 - 2007/5/21

N2 - We report a study of demagnetization protocols for frustrated arrays of interacting single-domain permalloy nanomagnets by rotating the arrays in a changing magnetic field. The most effective demagnetization is achieved by not only stepping the field strength down while the sample is rotating, but also by combining each field step with alternation in the field direction. By contrast, linearly decreasing the field strength or stepping the field down without alternating the field direction leaves the arrays with a larger remanent magnetic moment. These results suggest that nonmonotonic variations in field magnitude around and below the coercive field are important for the demagnetization process.

AB - We report a study of demagnetization protocols for frustrated arrays of interacting single-domain permalloy nanomagnets by rotating the arrays in a changing magnetic field. The most effective demagnetization is achieved by not only stepping the field strength down while the sample is rotating, but also by combining each field step with alternation in the field direction. By contrast, linearly decreasing the field strength or stepping the field down without alternating the field direction leaves the arrays with a larger remanent magnetic moment. These results suggest that nonmonotonic variations in field magnitude around and below the coercive field are important for the demagnetization process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248579542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248579542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1063/1.2712528

DO - 10.1063/1.2712528

M3 - Article

VL - 101

JO - Journal of Applied Physics

JF - Journal of Applied Physics

SN - 0021-8979

IS - 9

M1 - 09J104

ER -

Wang RF, Li J, McConville W, Nisoli C, Ke X, Freeland JW et al. Demagnetization protocols for frustrated interacting nanomagnet arrays. Journal of Applied Physics. 2007 May 21;101(9). 09J104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2712528