Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946-2000

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

221 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article describes a new data set that covers the electoral institutions used in all of the democratic legislative and presidential elections in 199 countries between 1946 (or independence) and 2000. A clear and consistent classification of the electoral institutions used in these elections is followed by a concise geographical and temporal analysis. The worldwide focus of the data set reveals several striking patterns. For example, there have been almost as many elections under dictatorship as there have been under democracy. Other patterns include the fact that presidential regimes nearly always employ proportional electoral formulas, absolute majority rule has become the worldwide norm for electing presidents, and non-majoritarian systems have become more complex due to the increasing use of multiple tiers and mixed electoral formulas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-121
Number of pages19
JournalElectoral Studies
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2005

Fingerprint

electoral system
election
majority rule
dictatorship
presidential election
president
regime
democracy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{3dbb6a9b240f43ab84cea04dae1c0cf3,
title = "Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946-2000",
abstract = "This article describes a new data set that covers the electoral institutions used in all of the democratic legislative and presidential elections in 199 countries between 1946 (or independence) and 2000. A clear and consistent classification of the electoral institutions used in these elections is followed by a concise geographical and temporal analysis. The worldwide focus of the data set reveals several striking patterns. For example, there have been almost as many elections under dictatorship as there have been under democracy. Other patterns include the fact that presidential regimes nearly always employ proportional electoral formulas, absolute majority rule has become the worldwide norm for electing presidents, and non-majoritarian systems have become more complex due to the increasing use of multiple tiers and mixed electoral formulas.",
author = "Golder, {Matthew Richard}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.electstud.2004.02.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "103--121",
journal = "Electoral Studies",
issn = "0261-3794",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946-2000. / Golder, Matthew Richard.

In: Electoral Studies, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.03.2005, p. 103-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946-2000

AU - Golder, Matthew Richard

PY - 2005/3/1

Y1 - 2005/3/1

N2 - This article describes a new data set that covers the electoral institutions used in all of the democratic legislative and presidential elections in 199 countries between 1946 (or independence) and 2000. A clear and consistent classification of the electoral institutions used in these elections is followed by a concise geographical and temporal analysis. The worldwide focus of the data set reveals several striking patterns. For example, there have been almost as many elections under dictatorship as there have been under democracy. Other patterns include the fact that presidential regimes nearly always employ proportional electoral formulas, absolute majority rule has become the worldwide norm for electing presidents, and non-majoritarian systems have become more complex due to the increasing use of multiple tiers and mixed electoral formulas.

AB - This article describes a new data set that covers the electoral institutions used in all of the democratic legislative and presidential elections in 199 countries between 1946 (or independence) and 2000. A clear and consistent classification of the electoral institutions used in these elections is followed by a concise geographical and temporal analysis. The worldwide focus of the data set reveals several striking patterns. For example, there have been almost as many elections under dictatorship as there have been under democracy. Other patterns include the fact that presidential regimes nearly always employ proportional electoral formulas, absolute majority rule has become the worldwide norm for electing presidents, and non-majoritarian systems have become more complex due to the increasing use of multiple tiers and mixed electoral formulas.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8744290674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=8744290674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.electstud.2004.02.008

DO - 10.1016/j.electstud.2004.02.008

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 103

EP - 121

JO - Electoral Studies

JF - Electoral Studies

SN - 0261-3794

IS - 1

ER -