Design, Desire, and Dif ference

Kevin M. Leander, Gail Louise Boldt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In response to the rise in popularity of concepts of “design” in education research, pedagogy, and curriculum design, in this article we consider how the New London Group conceived of the role of student design practices as an outcome of pedagogy, as well as the parallel role of design in teaching practices. In this descriptive analysis, we foreground the function and presence of meta-language for the practices of students and teachers. We follow the parallels that are played out, in the pedagogical vision by New London, between students using a metalanguage to design texts and teachers using a metalanguage to design the contexts and experiences of students. We argue that although design is oriented toward something usable— the object made or produced— desire and difference show up as the life in the process itself. We move from an outline of design into a discussion of the role of desire and difference in pedagogy, and especially within the teacher-student relationship. We sketch how desire and difference, as interpreted through Deleuze and Guattari and others answers different questions and provides different resources for understanding pedagogy. Taken up together, the registers of design, desire, and difference breathe more life into teacher practice and student practice as relational: the differences created in their contact zone offer a rich and productive image of pedagogy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-37
Number of pages9
JournalTheory Into Practice
Volume57
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2018

Fingerprint

metalanguage
student
teacher
teaching practice
student teacher
popularity
contact
curriculum
resources
education
experience
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

Leander, Kevin M. ; Boldt, Gail Louise. / Design, Desire, and Dif ference. In: Theory Into Practice. 2018 ; Vol. 57, No. 1. pp. 29-37.
@article{1ee262e990c441b0882552c4e797b02f,
title = "Design, Desire, and Dif ference",
abstract = "In response to the rise in popularity of concepts of “design” in education research, pedagogy, and curriculum design, in this article we consider how the New London Group conceived of the role of student design practices as an outcome of pedagogy, as well as the parallel role of design in teaching practices. In this descriptive analysis, we foreground the function and presence of meta-language for the practices of students and teachers. We follow the parallels that are played out, in the pedagogical vision by New London, between students using a metalanguage to design texts and teachers using a metalanguage to design the contexts and experiences of students. We argue that although design is oriented toward something usable— the object made or produced— desire and difference show up as the life in the process itself. We move from an outline of design into a discussion of the role of desire and difference in pedagogy, and especially within the teacher-student relationship. We sketch how desire and difference, as interpreted through Deleuze and Guattari and others answers different questions and provides different resources for understanding pedagogy. Taken up together, the registers of design, desire, and difference breathe more life into teacher practice and student practice as relational: the differences created in their contact zone offer a rich and productive image of pedagogy.",
author = "Leander, {Kevin M.} and Boldt, {Gail Louise}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/00405841.2017.1390331",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "29--37",
journal = "Theory into Practice",
issn = "0040-5841",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Design, Desire, and Dif ference. / Leander, Kevin M.; Boldt, Gail Louise.

In: Theory Into Practice, Vol. 57, No. 1, 02.01.2018, p. 29-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Design, Desire, and Dif ference

AU - Leander, Kevin M.

AU - Boldt, Gail Louise

PY - 2018/1/2

Y1 - 2018/1/2

N2 - In response to the rise in popularity of concepts of “design” in education research, pedagogy, and curriculum design, in this article we consider how the New London Group conceived of the role of student design practices as an outcome of pedagogy, as well as the parallel role of design in teaching practices. In this descriptive analysis, we foreground the function and presence of meta-language for the practices of students and teachers. We follow the parallels that are played out, in the pedagogical vision by New London, between students using a metalanguage to design texts and teachers using a metalanguage to design the contexts and experiences of students. We argue that although design is oriented toward something usable— the object made or produced— desire and difference show up as the life in the process itself. We move from an outline of design into a discussion of the role of desire and difference in pedagogy, and especially within the teacher-student relationship. We sketch how desire and difference, as interpreted through Deleuze and Guattari and others answers different questions and provides different resources for understanding pedagogy. Taken up together, the registers of design, desire, and difference breathe more life into teacher practice and student practice as relational: the differences created in their contact zone offer a rich and productive image of pedagogy.

AB - In response to the rise in popularity of concepts of “design” in education research, pedagogy, and curriculum design, in this article we consider how the New London Group conceived of the role of student design practices as an outcome of pedagogy, as well as the parallel role of design in teaching practices. In this descriptive analysis, we foreground the function and presence of meta-language for the practices of students and teachers. We follow the parallels that are played out, in the pedagogical vision by New London, between students using a metalanguage to design texts and teachers using a metalanguage to design the contexts and experiences of students. We argue that although design is oriented toward something usable— the object made or produced— desire and difference show up as the life in the process itself. We move from an outline of design into a discussion of the role of desire and difference in pedagogy, and especially within the teacher-student relationship. We sketch how desire and difference, as interpreted through Deleuze and Guattari and others answers different questions and provides different resources for understanding pedagogy. Taken up together, the registers of design, desire, and difference breathe more life into teacher practice and student practice as relational: the differences created in their contact zone offer a rich and productive image of pedagogy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042317853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042317853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00405841.2017.1390331

DO - 10.1080/00405841.2017.1390331

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042317853

VL - 57

SP - 29

EP - 37

JO - Theory into Practice

JF - Theory into Practice

SN - 0040-5841

IS - 1

ER -