Developing and communicating a taxonomy of ecological indicators

A case study from the mid-Atlantic

Denice Heller Wardrop, Carl Hershner, Kirk Havens, Kent Thornton, Donna Marie Bilkovic

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To ensure indicators of ecosystem health are integrated into environmental decision-making, it is imperative to provide a comprehensive framework for indicator selection and use. The same framework can also be used to evaluate the utility of any given indicator. The Atlantic Slope Consortium (ASC) has developed such a framework, based upon three primary elements: 1) The specific questions to be answered (the type of indicator), recognizing the following types of questions/indicators: Condition assessment: snapshot of the current state of the system; Stressor diagnosis: identification of causative factors of condition; Communication to the public: encouraging comprehension of condition in its most elementary or integrated form; Futures assessment: estimating the probable trajectory of condition, or assessing the vulnerability of any system to a stochastic event; Evaluation: a subset of condition indicators that evaluate the effectiveness of management actions. 2) The spatial and/or temporal scale of the issue being addressed (the spatial/temporal scale over which the indicator is valid). 3) The context of the question, using categories of surrounding land use as surrogates for social choices. A Fish Community Index (FCI) developed for the ASC will provide an example of utilizing the framework to select an indicator, as well as using the framework to judge the utility of the indicator.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-186
Number of pages8
JournalEcoHealth
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2007

Fingerprint

Ecosystem
Decision Making
Communication
Health
indicator
ecosystem health
vulnerability
trajectory
decision making
communication
land use
fish

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Wardrop, Denice Heller ; Hershner, Carl ; Havens, Kirk ; Thornton, Kent ; Bilkovic, Donna Marie. / Developing and communicating a taxonomy of ecological indicators : A case study from the mid-Atlantic. In: EcoHealth. 2007 ; Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 179-186.
@article{b92b8750e37344cc9bc913197656cdd7,
title = "Developing and communicating a taxonomy of ecological indicators: A case study from the mid-Atlantic",
abstract = "To ensure indicators of ecosystem health are integrated into environmental decision-making, it is imperative to provide a comprehensive framework for indicator selection and use. The same framework can also be used to evaluate the utility of any given indicator. The Atlantic Slope Consortium (ASC) has developed such a framework, based upon three primary elements: 1) The specific questions to be answered (the type of indicator), recognizing the following types of questions/indicators: Condition assessment: snapshot of the current state of the system; Stressor diagnosis: identification of causative factors of condition; Communication to the public: encouraging comprehension of condition in its most elementary or integrated form; Futures assessment: estimating the probable trajectory of condition, or assessing the vulnerability of any system to a stochastic event; Evaluation: a subset of condition indicators that evaluate the effectiveness of management actions. 2) The spatial and/or temporal scale of the issue being addressed (the spatial/temporal scale over which the indicator is valid). 3) The context of the question, using categories of surrounding land use as surrogates for social choices. A Fish Community Index (FCI) developed for the ASC will provide an example of utilizing the framework to select an indicator, as well as using the framework to judge the utility of the indicator.",
author = "Wardrop, {Denice Heller} and Carl Hershner and Kirk Havens and Kent Thornton and Bilkovic, {Donna Marie}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10393-007-0108-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "179--186",
journal = "EcoHealth",
issn = "1612-9202",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

Developing and communicating a taxonomy of ecological indicators : A case study from the mid-Atlantic. / Wardrop, Denice Heller; Hershner, Carl; Havens, Kirk; Thornton, Kent; Bilkovic, Donna Marie.

In: EcoHealth, Vol. 4, No. 2, 01.06.2007, p. 179-186.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing and communicating a taxonomy of ecological indicators

T2 - A case study from the mid-Atlantic

AU - Wardrop, Denice Heller

AU - Hershner, Carl

AU - Havens, Kirk

AU - Thornton, Kent

AU - Bilkovic, Donna Marie

PY - 2007/6/1

Y1 - 2007/6/1

N2 - To ensure indicators of ecosystem health are integrated into environmental decision-making, it is imperative to provide a comprehensive framework for indicator selection and use. The same framework can also be used to evaluate the utility of any given indicator. The Atlantic Slope Consortium (ASC) has developed such a framework, based upon three primary elements: 1) The specific questions to be answered (the type of indicator), recognizing the following types of questions/indicators: Condition assessment: snapshot of the current state of the system; Stressor diagnosis: identification of causative factors of condition; Communication to the public: encouraging comprehension of condition in its most elementary or integrated form; Futures assessment: estimating the probable trajectory of condition, or assessing the vulnerability of any system to a stochastic event; Evaluation: a subset of condition indicators that evaluate the effectiveness of management actions. 2) The spatial and/or temporal scale of the issue being addressed (the spatial/temporal scale over which the indicator is valid). 3) The context of the question, using categories of surrounding land use as surrogates for social choices. A Fish Community Index (FCI) developed for the ASC will provide an example of utilizing the framework to select an indicator, as well as using the framework to judge the utility of the indicator.

AB - To ensure indicators of ecosystem health are integrated into environmental decision-making, it is imperative to provide a comprehensive framework for indicator selection and use. The same framework can also be used to evaluate the utility of any given indicator. The Atlantic Slope Consortium (ASC) has developed such a framework, based upon three primary elements: 1) The specific questions to be answered (the type of indicator), recognizing the following types of questions/indicators: Condition assessment: snapshot of the current state of the system; Stressor diagnosis: identification of causative factors of condition; Communication to the public: encouraging comprehension of condition in its most elementary or integrated form; Futures assessment: estimating the probable trajectory of condition, or assessing the vulnerability of any system to a stochastic event; Evaluation: a subset of condition indicators that evaluate the effectiveness of management actions. 2) The spatial and/or temporal scale of the issue being addressed (the spatial/temporal scale over which the indicator is valid). 3) The context of the question, using categories of surrounding land use as surrogates for social choices. A Fish Community Index (FCI) developed for the ASC will provide an example of utilizing the framework to select an indicator, as well as using the framework to judge the utility of the indicator.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447133450&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447133450&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10393-007-0108-2

DO - 10.1007/s10393-007-0108-2

M3 - Review article

VL - 4

SP - 179

EP - 186

JO - EcoHealth

JF - EcoHealth

SN - 1612-9202

IS - 2

ER -