Development and initial validation of a procedural and distributive just world measure

Todd Lucas, Sheldon Alexander, Ira Firestone, James Marshall Lebreton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Belief in a Just World Theory proposes that individuals need to believe that people get what they deserve. We suggest that individual differences in just world beliefs may reflect perceived deservedness of both procedural and distributive justice criteria. Two samples were used to analyze the reliability, factor structure, invariance and validity of a newly proposed just world measure. In both samples, there was strong evidence of distinct procedural and distributive just world beliefs, suggesting that individuals may be characterized not only by their consideration for the deservingness of outcomes, but also rules, processes or interpersonal treatment. This new focus on a procedural-distributive just world distinction can bridge individual differences issues with other areas of justice research, where the importance of procedural justice judgments is well recognized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)71-82
Number of pages12
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2007

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Individuality
Statistical Factor Analysis
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{0228356c5edf4d28afb374d9e9db8c47,
title = "Development and initial validation of a procedural and distributive just world measure",
abstract = "Belief in a Just World Theory proposes that individuals need to believe that people get what they deserve. We suggest that individual differences in just world beliefs may reflect perceived deservedness of both procedural and distributive justice criteria. Two samples were used to analyze the reliability, factor structure, invariance and validity of a newly proposed just world measure. In both samples, there was strong evidence of distinct procedural and distributive just world beliefs, suggesting that individuals may be characterized not only by their consideration for the deservingness of outcomes, but also rules, processes or interpersonal treatment. This new focus on a procedural-distributive just world distinction can bridge individual differences issues with other areas of justice research, where the importance of procedural justice judgments is well recognized.",
author = "Todd Lucas and Sheldon Alexander and Ira Firestone and Lebreton, {James Marshall}",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "71--82",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

Development and initial validation of a procedural and distributive just world measure. / Lucas, Todd; Alexander, Sheldon; Firestone, Ira; Lebreton, James Marshall.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 43, No. 1, 01.07.2007, p. 71-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and initial validation of a procedural and distributive just world measure

AU - Lucas, Todd

AU - Alexander, Sheldon

AU - Firestone, Ira

AU - Lebreton, James Marshall

PY - 2007/7/1

Y1 - 2007/7/1

N2 - Belief in a Just World Theory proposes that individuals need to believe that people get what they deserve. We suggest that individual differences in just world beliefs may reflect perceived deservedness of both procedural and distributive justice criteria. Two samples were used to analyze the reliability, factor structure, invariance and validity of a newly proposed just world measure. In both samples, there was strong evidence of distinct procedural and distributive just world beliefs, suggesting that individuals may be characterized not only by their consideration for the deservingness of outcomes, but also rules, processes or interpersonal treatment. This new focus on a procedural-distributive just world distinction can bridge individual differences issues with other areas of justice research, where the importance of procedural justice judgments is well recognized.

AB - Belief in a Just World Theory proposes that individuals need to believe that people get what they deserve. We suggest that individual differences in just world beliefs may reflect perceived deservedness of both procedural and distributive justice criteria. Two samples were used to analyze the reliability, factor structure, invariance and validity of a newly proposed just world measure. In both samples, there was strong evidence of distinct procedural and distributive just world beliefs, suggesting that individuals may be characterized not only by their consideration for the deservingness of outcomes, but also rules, processes or interpersonal treatment. This new focus on a procedural-distributive just world distinction can bridge individual differences issues with other areas of justice research, where the importance of procedural justice judgments is well recognized.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947727730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947727730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.008

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33947727730

VL - 43

SP - 71

EP - 82

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

IS - 1

ER -