Development of a water-extractable phosphorus test for manure: An interlaboratory study

Ann M. Wolf, Peter J.A. Kleinman, Andrew N. Sharpley, Douglas B. Beegle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The loss of P in runoff from agricultural land to which manure has been applied is related to water extractable P (WEP) in manure. However, a standard method to routinely measure WEP in manures has not been established and variables impacting the measurement have not been widely studied. In this investigation, the impact of manure holding times (1-22 d), WEP extract holding times (0-17 d with and without acidification), and method of P measurement on WEP were evaluated. In addition, four manure samples (one dairy, one swine, two poultry) and proposed WEP method were distributed to seven public and private laboratories to assess inter- and intralaboratory variability of WEP test results. The proposed method entailed extracting manures with water at a 1:200 ratio (manure solids/water), shaking for 60 min on a reciprocating shaker, and either filtering or centrifuging before P measurement by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP). Results show refrigerated (4°C) manure samples can be held up to 22 d and acidified extracts 18 d before analysis. Separation procedures (filtering vs. centrifuging) did not impact WEP measurements. While the method of P measurement (ICP vs. colorimetric) did have a significant impact on test results, the two methods were highly correlated and results within 5 to 10%. The proposed manure WEP method shows a high level of precision (relative standard deviations [RSDs] < 6.5) within laboratories, although greater variability (RSDs of 13.3-28.8) exists among laboratories when compared with other standard manure analyses, such as total P.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)695-700
Number of pages6
JournalSoil Science Society of America Journal
Volume69
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2005

Fingerprint

manure
phosphorus
water
testing
methodology
test
atomic emission spectroscopy
extracts
atomic absorption spectrometry
method
poultry
acidification
agricultural land
dairies
runoff
plasma
sampling
swine
laboratory

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Soil Science

Cite this

Wolf, Ann M. ; Kleinman, Peter J.A. ; Sharpley, Andrew N. ; Beegle, Douglas B. / Development of a water-extractable phosphorus test for manure : An interlaboratory study. In: Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2005 ; Vol. 69, No. 3. pp. 695-700.
@article{6b4fb121a6af42769259ea1e8c9ce9d0,
title = "Development of a water-extractable phosphorus test for manure: An interlaboratory study",
abstract = "The loss of P in runoff from agricultural land to which manure has been applied is related to water extractable P (WEP) in manure. However, a standard method to routinely measure WEP in manures has not been established and variables impacting the measurement have not been widely studied. In this investigation, the impact of manure holding times (1-22 d), WEP extract holding times (0-17 d with and without acidification), and method of P measurement on WEP were evaluated. In addition, four manure samples (one dairy, one swine, two poultry) and proposed WEP method were distributed to seven public and private laboratories to assess inter- and intralaboratory variability of WEP test results. The proposed method entailed extracting manures with water at a 1:200 ratio (manure solids/water), shaking for 60 min on a reciprocating shaker, and either filtering or centrifuging before P measurement by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP). Results show refrigerated (4°C) manure samples can be held up to 22 d and acidified extracts 18 d before analysis. Separation procedures (filtering vs. centrifuging) did not impact WEP measurements. While the method of P measurement (ICP vs. colorimetric) did have a significant impact on test results, the two methods were highly correlated and results within 5 to 10{\%}. The proposed manure WEP method shows a high level of precision (relative standard deviations [RSDs] < 6.5) within laboratories, although greater variability (RSDs of 13.3-28.8) exists among laboratories when compared with other standard manure analyses, such as total P.",
author = "Wolf, {Ann M.} and Kleinman, {Peter J.A.} and Sharpley, {Andrew N.} and Beegle, {Douglas B.}",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2136/sssaj2004.0096",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "695--700",
journal = "Soil Science Society of America Journal",
issn = "0361-5995",
publisher = "Soil Science Society of America",
number = "3",

}

Development of a water-extractable phosphorus test for manure : An interlaboratory study. / Wolf, Ann M.; Kleinman, Peter J.A.; Sharpley, Andrew N.; Beegle, Douglas B.

In: Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 69, No. 3, 01.05.2005, p. 695-700.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a water-extractable phosphorus test for manure

T2 - An interlaboratory study

AU - Wolf, Ann M.

AU - Kleinman, Peter J.A.

AU - Sharpley, Andrew N.

AU - Beegle, Douglas B.

PY - 2005/5/1

Y1 - 2005/5/1

N2 - The loss of P in runoff from agricultural land to which manure has been applied is related to water extractable P (WEP) in manure. However, a standard method to routinely measure WEP in manures has not been established and variables impacting the measurement have not been widely studied. In this investigation, the impact of manure holding times (1-22 d), WEP extract holding times (0-17 d with and without acidification), and method of P measurement on WEP were evaluated. In addition, four manure samples (one dairy, one swine, two poultry) and proposed WEP method were distributed to seven public and private laboratories to assess inter- and intralaboratory variability of WEP test results. The proposed method entailed extracting manures with water at a 1:200 ratio (manure solids/water), shaking for 60 min on a reciprocating shaker, and either filtering or centrifuging before P measurement by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP). Results show refrigerated (4°C) manure samples can be held up to 22 d and acidified extracts 18 d before analysis. Separation procedures (filtering vs. centrifuging) did not impact WEP measurements. While the method of P measurement (ICP vs. colorimetric) did have a significant impact on test results, the two methods were highly correlated and results within 5 to 10%. The proposed manure WEP method shows a high level of precision (relative standard deviations [RSDs] < 6.5) within laboratories, although greater variability (RSDs of 13.3-28.8) exists among laboratories when compared with other standard manure analyses, such as total P.

AB - The loss of P in runoff from agricultural land to which manure has been applied is related to water extractable P (WEP) in manure. However, a standard method to routinely measure WEP in manures has not been established and variables impacting the measurement have not been widely studied. In this investigation, the impact of manure holding times (1-22 d), WEP extract holding times (0-17 d with and without acidification), and method of P measurement on WEP were evaluated. In addition, four manure samples (one dairy, one swine, two poultry) and proposed WEP method were distributed to seven public and private laboratories to assess inter- and intralaboratory variability of WEP test results. The proposed method entailed extracting manures with water at a 1:200 ratio (manure solids/water), shaking for 60 min on a reciprocating shaker, and either filtering or centrifuging before P measurement by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP). Results show refrigerated (4°C) manure samples can be held up to 22 d and acidified extracts 18 d before analysis. Separation procedures (filtering vs. centrifuging) did not impact WEP measurements. While the method of P measurement (ICP vs. colorimetric) did have a significant impact on test results, the two methods were highly correlated and results within 5 to 10%. The proposed manure WEP method shows a high level of precision (relative standard deviations [RSDs] < 6.5) within laboratories, although greater variability (RSDs of 13.3-28.8) exists among laboratories when compared with other standard manure analyses, such as total P.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18644369687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18644369687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2136/sssaj2004.0096

DO - 10.2136/sssaj2004.0096

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:18644369687

VL - 69

SP - 695

EP - 700

JO - Soil Science Society of America Journal

JF - Soil Science Society of America Journal

SN - 0361-5995

IS - 3

ER -