Development of nontarget wildlife exclusion devices for small mammal trap protection

Patrick Roden-Reynolds, Grace Hummell, Erika T. Machtinger, Andrew Y. Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Trapping small mammals is often required for life-history studies, evaluating predator–prey interactions, or assessing zoonotic disease. However, preventing disturbance from nontarget wildlife such as raccoons (Procyon lotor) and eastern gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) is a significant challenge. Our goal was to produce a protective exclusion device that would protect Sherman live traps from nontarget wildlife interference while enabling low-cost and efficient small mammal captures. At the U.S. Department of Agriculture Research Center West in Beltsville, Maryland, USA, during 2017, we created and compared 2 types of exclusion devices—a modified Havahart® and a raccoon exclusion device (RED)—for efficacy of reducing disturbance to Sherman box traps, and on resulting small mammal capture rates. Modified Havahart® and REDs were similarly successful at reducing disturbance by raccoons. There was more disturbance by eastern gray squirrels with the REDs, but small mammal capture rates in the REDs did not differ from the modified Havahart®; each trap protection type reduced nontarget disturbance by approximately 50%. The modified Havahart® device was >5 times more expensive to produce than the RED; therefore, the RED offers a low-cost and effective way to reduce nontarget interference with small mammal trapping efforts. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)387-393
Number of pages7
JournalWildlife Society Bulletin
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2018

Fingerprint

small mammal
disturbance
trapping
cost
life history
wildlife
agriculture
rate

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Roden-Reynolds, Patrick ; Hummell, Grace ; Machtinger, Erika T. ; Li, Andrew Y. / Development of nontarget wildlife exclusion devices for small mammal trap protection. In: Wildlife Society Bulletin. 2018 ; Vol. 42, No. 3. pp. 387-393.
@article{bea3cd70f90e45178db7e4b07db261b9,
title = "Development of nontarget wildlife exclusion devices for small mammal trap protection",
abstract = "Trapping small mammals is often required for life-history studies, evaluating predator–prey interactions, or assessing zoonotic disease. However, preventing disturbance from nontarget wildlife such as raccoons (Procyon lotor) and eastern gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) is a significant challenge. Our goal was to produce a protective exclusion device that would protect Sherman live traps from nontarget wildlife interference while enabling low-cost and efficient small mammal captures. At the U.S. Department of Agriculture Research Center West in Beltsville, Maryland, USA, during 2017, we created and compared 2 types of exclusion devices—a modified Havahart{\circledR} and a raccoon exclusion device (RED)—for efficacy of reducing disturbance to Sherman box traps, and on resulting small mammal capture rates. Modified Havahart{\circledR} and REDs were similarly successful at reducing disturbance by raccoons. There was more disturbance by eastern gray squirrels with the REDs, but small mammal capture rates in the REDs did not differ from the modified Havahart{\circledR}; each trap protection type reduced nontarget disturbance by approximately 50{\%}. The modified Havahart{\circledR} device was >5 times more expensive to produce than the RED; therefore, the RED offers a low-cost and effective way to reduce nontarget interference with small mammal trapping efforts. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.",
author = "Patrick Roden-Reynolds and Grace Hummell and Machtinger, {Erika T.} and Li, {Andrew Y.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1002/wsb.905",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "387--393",
journal = "Wildlife Society Bulletin",
issn = "0091-7648",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Development of nontarget wildlife exclusion devices for small mammal trap protection. / Roden-Reynolds, Patrick; Hummell, Grace; Machtinger, Erika T.; Li, Andrew Y.

In: Wildlife Society Bulletin, Vol. 42, No. 3, 09.2018, p. 387-393.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of nontarget wildlife exclusion devices for small mammal trap protection

AU - Roden-Reynolds, Patrick

AU - Hummell, Grace

AU - Machtinger, Erika T.

AU - Li, Andrew Y.

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Trapping small mammals is often required for life-history studies, evaluating predator–prey interactions, or assessing zoonotic disease. However, preventing disturbance from nontarget wildlife such as raccoons (Procyon lotor) and eastern gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) is a significant challenge. Our goal was to produce a protective exclusion device that would protect Sherman live traps from nontarget wildlife interference while enabling low-cost and efficient small mammal captures. At the U.S. Department of Agriculture Research Center West in Beltsville, Maryland, USA, during 2017, we created and compared 2 types of exclusion devices—a modified Havahart® and a raccoon exclusion device (RED)—for efficacy of reducing disturbance to Sherman box traps, and on resulting small mammal capture rates. Modified Havahart® and REDs were similarly successful at reducing disturbance by raccoons. There was more disturbance by eastern gray squirrels with the REDs, but small mammal capture rates in the REDs did not differ from the modified Havahart®; each trap protection type reduced nontarget disturbance by approximately 50%. The modified Havahart® device was >5 times more expensive to produce than the RED; therefore, the RED offers a low-cost and effective way to reduce nontarget interference with small mammal trapping efforts. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

AB - Trapping small mammals is often required for life-history studies, evaluating predator–prey interactions, or assessing zoonotic disease. However, preventing disturbance from nontarget wildlife such as raccoons (Procyon lotor) and eastern gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) is a significant challenge. Our goal was to produce a protective exclusion device that would protect Sherman live traps from nontarget wildlife interference while enabling low-cost and efficient small mammal captures. At the U.S. Department of Agriculture Research Center West in Beltsville, Maryland, USA, during 2017, we created and compared 2 types of exclusion devices—a modified Havahart® and a raccoon exclusion device (RED)—for efficacy of reducing disturbance to Sherman box traps, and on resulting small mammal capture rates. Modified Havahart® and REDs were similarly successful at reducing disturbance by raccoons. There was more disturbance by eastern gray squirrels with the REDs, but small mammal capture rates in the REDs did not differ from the modified Havahart®; each trap protection type reduced nontarget disturbance by approximately 50%. The modified Havahart® device was >5 times more expensive to produce than the RED; therefore, the RED offers a low-cost and effective way to reduce nontarget interference with small mammal trapping efforts. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052882553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052882553&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/wsb.905

DO - 10.1002/wsb.905

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85052882553

VL - 42

SP - 387

EP - 393

JO - Wildlife Society Bulletin

JF - Wildlife Society Bulletin

SN - 0091-7648

IS - 3

ER -