Diabetes nurse case management and motivational interviewing for change (DYNAMIC): Results of a 2-year randomized controlled pragmatic trial

Robert A. Gabbay, Raquel M. Añel-Tiangco, Cheryl Dellasega, David Mauger, Alan Adelman, Deborah H.A. Van Horn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to determine whether the addition of nurse case managers (NCMs) trained in motivational interviewing (MI) to usual care would result in improved outcomes in high-risk type 2 diabetes patients. Methods: A 2-year randomized controlled pragmatic trial randomized 545 patients to usual care control (n=313) or those who received the intervention (n=232) with additional practice-embedded NCM care, including MI-guided behavior change counseling. The NCMs received intensive MI training with ongoing fidelity assessment. Results: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was better in the intervention than usual care group (131±15 vs. 135±18mmHg, respectively; P<0.05). Improvements were seen in both the control and intervention groups in terms of HbA1c (from 9.1% to 8.0% and from 8.8% to 7.8%, respectively), low-density lipoprotein (LDL; from 127 to 100mg/dL and from 128 to 102mg/dL, respectively), and diastolic blood pressure (from 78 to 74mmHg and from 80 to 74mmHg, respectively). Depression symptom scores were better in the intervention group. The reduction in diabetes-related distress approached statistical significance. Conclusions: The NCMs and MI improved SBP and complications screening. The large decrease in HbA1C and LDL in the control group may have obscured any further intervention effect. Although nurses prompted providers for medication titration, strategies to reduce provider clinical inertia may also be needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)349-357
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Diabetes
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2013

Fingerprint

Pragmatic Clinical Trials
Motivational Interviewing
Case Management
Randomized Controlled Trials
Nurses
Blood Pressure
Control Groups
LDL Lipoproteins
varespladib methyl
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Counseling
Depression
Case Managers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

@article{be71099ce9a94362ac4878335aa4ee5d,
title = "Diabetes nurse case management and motivational interviewing for change (DYNAMIC): Results of a 2-year randomized controlled pragmatic trial",
abstract = "Background: The aim of the present study was to determine whether the addition of nurse case managers (NCMs) trained in motivational interviewing (MI) to usual care would result in improved outcomes in high-risk type 2 diabetes patients. Methods: A 2-year randomized controlled pragmatic trial randomized 545 patients to usual care control (n=313) or those who received the intervention (n=232) with additional practice-embedded NCM care, including MI-guided behavior change counseling. The NCMs received intensive MI training with ongoing fidelity assessment. Results: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was better in the intervention than usual care group (131±15 vs. 135±18mmHg, respectively; P<0.05). Improvements were seen in both the control and intervention groups in terms of HbA1c (from 9.1{\%} to 8.0{\%} and from 8.8{\%} to 7.8{\%}, respectively), low-density lipoprotein (LDL; from 127 to 100mg/dL and from 128 to 102mg/dL, respectively), and diastolic blood pressure (from 78 to 74mmHg and from 80 to 74mmHg, respectively). Depression symptom scores were better in the intervention group. The reduction in diabetes-related distress approached statistical significance. Conclusions: The NCMs and MI improved SBP and complications screening. The large decrease in HbA1C and LDL in the control group may have obscured any further intervention effect. Although nurses prompted providers for medication titration, strategies to reduce provider clinical inertia may also be needed.",
author = "Gabbay, {Robert A.} and A{\~n}el-Tiangco, {Raquel M.} and Cheryl Dellasega and David Mauger and Alan Adelman and {Van Horn}, {Deborah H.A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1753-0407.12030",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "349--357",
journal = "Journal of Diabetes",
issn = "1753-0393",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Diabetes nurse case management and motivational interviewing for change (DYNAMIC) : Results of a 2-year randomized controlled pragmatic trial. / Gabbay, Robert A.; Añel-Tiangco, Raquel M.; Dellasega, Cheryl; Mauger, David; Adelman, Alan; Van Horn, Deborah H.A.

In: Journal of Diabetes, Vol. 5, No. 3, 01.09.2013, p. 349-357.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diabetes nurse case management and motivational interviewing for change (DYNAMIC)

T2 - Results of a 2-year randomized controlled pragmatic trial

AU - Gabbay, Robert A.

AU - Añel-Tiangco, Raquel M.

AU - Dellasega, Cheryl

AU - Mauger, David

AU - Adelman, Alan

AU - Van Horn, Deborah H.A.

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - Background: The aim of the present study was to determine whether the addition of nurse case managers (NCMs) trained in motivational interviewing (MI) to usual care would result in improved outcomes in high-risk type 2 diabetes patients. Methods: A 2-year randomized controlled pragmatic trial randomized 545 patients to usual care control (n=313) or those who received the intervention (n=232) with additional practice-embedded NCM care, including MI-guided behavior change counseling. The NCMs received intensive MI training with ongoing fidelity assessment. Results: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was better in the intervention than usual care group (131±15 vs. 135±18mmHg, respectively; P<0.05). Improvements were seen in both the control and intervention groups in terms of HbA1c (from 9.1% to 8.0% and from 8.8% to 7.8%, respectively), low-density lipoprotein (LDL; from 127 to 100mg/dL and from 128 to 102mg/dL, respectively), and diastolic blood pressure (from 78 to 74mmHg and from 80 to 74mmHg, respectively). Depression symptom scores were better in the intervention group. The reduction in diabetes-related distress approached statistical significance. Conclusions: The NCMs and MI improved SBP and complications screening. The large decrease in HbA1C and LDL in the control group may have obscured any further intervention effect. Although nurses prompted providers for medication titration, strategies to reduce provider clinical inertia may also be needed.

AB - Background: The aim of the present study was to determine whether the addition of nurse case managers (NCMs) trained in motivational interviewing (MI) to usual care would result in improved outcomes in high-risk type 2 diabetes patients. Methods: A 2-year randomized controlled pragmatic trial randomized 545 patients to usual care control (n=313) or those who received the intervention (n=232) with additional practice-embedded NCM care, including MI-guided behavior change counseling. The NCMs received intensive MI training with ongoing fidelity assessment. Results: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was better in the intervention than usual care group (131±15 vs. 135±18mmHg, respectively; P<0.05). Improvements were seen in both the control and intervention groups in terms of HbA1c (from 9.1% to 8.0% and from 8.8% to 7.8%, respectively), low-density lipoprotein (LDL; from 127 to 100mg/dL and from 128 to 102mg/dL, respectively), and diastolic blood pressure (from 78 to 74mmHg and from 80 to 74mmHg, respectively). Depression symptom scores were better in the intervention group. The reduction in diabetes-related distress approached statistical significance. Conclusions: The NCMs and MI improved SBP and complications screening. The large decrease in HbA1C and LDL in the control group may have obscured any further intervention effect. Although nurses prompted providers for medication titration, strategies to reduce provider clinical inertia may also be needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881547534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881547534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1753-0407.12030

DO - 10.1111/1753-0407.12030

M3 - Article

C2 - 23368423

AN - SCOPUS:84881547534

VL - 5

SP - 349

EP - 357

JO - Journal of Diabetes

JF - Journal of Diabetes

SN - 1753-0393

IS - 3

ER -