Difference in Condom Use Between Bear Concordant and Discordant Dyads During the Last Anal Sex Event

Phillip W. Schnarrs, Joshua G. Rosenberger, Vanessa Schick, Adolph Delgado, Lindsay Briggs, Brian Dodge, Michael Reece

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to understand how bear identity influenced condom use during the last anal sex event. Participants were recruited to complete an online, anonymous self-report survey through bear-related sexual and social networking websites. A total of 1,080 men who identified as gay or bisexual and as a member of the bear community and were 18 years or older completed the survey. Overall, fewer than a third of men reported condom use during the most recent receptive (28%) and insertive (30%) anal sex event. Men in bear concordant pairings were less likely to use a condom during receptive and insertive anal sex compared to those is discordant pairings (p <.05). Findings suggest that bear identity concordance influences condom use during anal sex after accounting for an individual’s relationship to their most recent partner as well as other confounding variables.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-208
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Homosexuality
Volume64
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 28 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Difference in Condom Use Between Bear Concordant and Discordant Dyads During the Last Anal Sex Event'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this