Differences, borders, fusions

Charles E. Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the context of Dewey's account of habits and conduct, we understand will to refer not to the subjective agency of an autonomous person or to any kind of a priori capacity of human reason or spirit but to habitual interactions in the interdependence of people with their social and natural environments. For Dewey, this claim suggests that in the absence of transcendental guidance or a socially independent inner and given moral conscience, human natures are grounded in indeterminate freedom. People's defining qualities and characters are formed in particular histories of social and environmental interdependence and the habitual conduct that develops in these embodiments. We may say that human predispositions and sensibilities form specific commonalities that are fluid in the sense that they are always available for transformation and "transvaluation" and constitute only finite, mortal interconnections with multiple lineages of temporal formation. I accept these claims by Dewey as I develop the thought of this article in two sections on differences, fusions, and borders. I want to show the ways differences and fusions happen compatibly. As we come to understand them they allow us to see dimensions of borders in contexts of interdependence, interaction, and intersection. In this understanding we will be predisposed to think of commonalities and identifying characteristics as thoroughly social.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)16-24
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Speculative Philosophy
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Interdependence
Fusion
Habitual
Interaction
Sensibility
Human Nature
Person
History
Mortals
Moral Conscience
Transcendental
Habit
Predisposition
Thought
Guidance
Indeterminate
Embodiment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Cite this

Scott, Charles E. / Differences, borders, fusions. In: Journal of Speculative Philosophy. 2015 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 16-24.
@article{9847fcc11eeb4d548f42e79f9207656c,
title = "Differences, borders, fusions",
abstract = "In the context of Dewey's account of habits and conduct, we understand will to refer not to the subjective agency of an autonomous person or to any kind of a priori capacity of human reason or spirit but to habitual interactions in the interdependence of people with their social and natural environments. For Dewey, this claim suggests that in the absence of transcendental guidance or a socially independent inner and given moral conscience, human natures are grounded in indeterminate freedom. People's defining qualities and characters are formed in particular histories of social and environmental interdependence and the habitual conduct that develops in these embodiments. We may say that human predispositions and sensibilities form specific commonalities that are fluid in the sense that they are always available for transformation and {"}transvaluation{"} and constitute only finite, mortal interconnections with multiple lineages of temporal formation. I accept these claims by Dewey as I develop the thought of this article in two sections on differences, fusions, and borders. I want to show the ways differences and fusions happen compatibly. As we come to understand them they allow us to see dimensions of borders in contexts of interdependence, interaction, and intersection. In this understanding we will be predisposed to think of commonalities and identifying characteristics as thoroughly social.",
author = "Scott, {Charles E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/jsp.2015.0006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "16--24",
journal = "Journal of Speculative Philosophy",
issn = "0891-625X",
publisher = "Penn State University Press",
number = "1",

}

Differences, borders, fusions. / Scott, Charles E.

In: Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 16-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences, borders, fusions

AU - Scott, Charles E.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - In the context of Dewey's account of habits and conduct, we understand will to refer not to the subjective agency of an autonomous person or to any kind of a priori capacity of human reason or spirit but to habitual interactions in the interdependence of people with their social and natural environments. For Dewey, this claim suggests that in the absence of transcendental guidance or a socially independent inner and given moral conscience, human natures are grounded in indeterminate freedom. People's defining qualities and characters are formed in particular histories of social and environmental interdependence and the habitual conduct that develops in these embodiments. We may say that human predispositions and sensibilities form specific commonalities that are fluid in the sense that they are always available for transformation and "transvaluation" and constitute only finite, mortal interconnections with multiple lineages of temporal formation. I accept these claims by Dewey as I develop the thought of this article in two sections on differences, fusions, and borders. I want to show the ways differences and fusions happen compatibly. As we come to understand them they allow us to see dimensions of borders in contexts of interdependence, interaction, and intersection. In this understanding we will be predisposed to think of commonalities and identifying characteristics as thoroughly social.

AB - In the context of Dewey's account of habits and conduct, we understand will to refer not to the subjective agency of an autonomous person or to any kind of a priori capacity of human reason or spirit but to habitual interactions in the interdependence of people with their social and natural environments. For Dewey, this claim suggests that in the absence of transcendental guidance or a socially independent inner and given moral conscience, human natures are grounded in indeterminate freedom. People's defining qualities and characters are formed in particular histories of social and environmental interdependence and the habitual conduct that develops in these embodiments. We may say that human predispositions and sensibilities form specific commonalities that are fluid in the sense that they are always available for transformation and "transvaluation" and constitute only finite, mortal interconnections with multiple lineages of temporal formation. I accept these claims by Dewey as I develop the thought of this article in two sections on differences, fusions, and borders. I want to show the ways differences and fusions happen compatibly. As we come to understand them they allow us to see dimensions of borders in contexts of interdependence, interaction, and intersection. In this understanding we will be predisposed to think of commonalities and identifying characteristics as thoroughly social.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922053476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922053476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/jsp.2015.0006

DO - 10.1353/jsp.2015.0006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84922053476

VL - 29

SP - 16

EP - 24

JO - Journal of Speculative Philosophy

JF - Journal of Speculative Philosophy

SN - 0891-625X

IS - 1

ER -