Differences in current amplitude evoking leg extension in individuals with spinal cord injury

Ashraf S. Gorgey, Gilbert M. Cho, David R. Dolbow, David R. Gater

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of regional thigh composition that result in different responses to current amplitude among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) during applications of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to evoke dynamic leg extension. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTINGS: Academic Settings. METHODS: Five males with chronic motor complete SCI completed 3 visits of NMES to determine the current amplitude required to evoke full knee extension. The participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging of both thighs to measure skeletal muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), thigh subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and intramuscular fat (IMF). Applicants were classified into high (n = 3) and low-responders (n = 2) based on the determined current amplitude. RESULTS: The low-responders required 48-59% greater current amplitude to complete the same task as the high-responders. Low-responders had greater thigh SAT CSA (51-56%) than the high-responders with SCI. After adjusting to whole thigh CSA, IMF CSA was significantly greater in the low- responders; whereas skeletal muscle CSA was lower compared to the high-responders. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that thigh SAT and IMF act as insulation against propagation of current during surface NMES applications in individuals with SCI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-170
Number of pages10
JournalNeuroRehabilitation
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 18 2013

Fingerprint

Thigh
Spinal Cord Injuries
Leg
Subcutaneous Fat
Electric Stimulation
Fats
Skeletal Muscle
Knee
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Gorgey, Ashraf S. ; Cho, Gilbert M. ; Dolbow, David R. ; Gater, David R. / Differences in current amplitude evoking leg extension in individuals with spinal cord injury. In: NeuroRehabilitation. 2013 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 161-170.
@article{e90e0511d1814a46a42065bc3d317368,
title = "Differences in current amplitude evoking leg extension in individuals with spinal cord injury",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of regional thigh composition that result in different responses to current amplitude among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) during applications of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to evoke dynamic leg extension. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTINGS: Academic Settings. METHODS: Five males with chronic motor complete SCI completed 3 visits of NMES to determine the current amplitude required to evoke full knee extension. The participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging of both thighs to measure skeletal muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), thigh subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and intramuscular fat (IMF). Applicants were classified into high (n = 3) and low-responders (n = 2) based on the determined current amplitude. RESULTS: The low-responders required 48-59{\%} greater current amplitude to complete the same task as the high-responders. Low-responders had greater thigh SAT CSA (51-56{\%}) than the high-responders with SCI. After adjusting to whole thigh CSA, IMF CSA was significantly greater in the low- responders; whereas skeletal muscle CSA was lower compared to the high-responders. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that thigh SAT and IMF act as insulation against propagation of current during surface NMES applications in individuals with SCI.",
author = "Gorgey, {Ashraf S.} and Cho, {Gilbert M.} and Dolbow, {David R.} and Gater, {David R.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "18",
doi = "10.3233/NRE-130941",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "161--170",
journal = "NeuroRehabilitation",
issn = "1053-8135",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "1",

}

Differences in current amplitude evoking leg extension in individuals with spinal cord injury. / Gorgey, Ashraf S.; Cho, Gilbert M.; Dolbow, David R.; Gater, David R.

In: NeuroRehabilitation, Vol. 33, No. 1, 18.09.2013, p. 161-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in current amplitude evoking leg extension in individuals with spinal cord injury

AU - Gorgey, Ashraf S.

AU - Cho, Gilbert M.

AU - Dolbow, David R.

AU - Gater, David R.

PY - 2013/9/18

Y1 - 2013/9/18

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of regional thigh composition that result in different responses to current amplitude among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) during applications of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to evoke dynamic leg extension. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTINGS: Academic Settings. METHODS: Five males with chronic motor complete SCI completed 3 visits of NMES to determine the current amplitude required to evoke full knee extension. The participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging of both thighs to measure skeletal muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), thigh subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and intramuscular fat (IMF). Applicants were classified into high (n = 3) and low-responders (n = 2) based on the determined current amplitude. RESULTS: The low-responders required 48-59% greater current amplitude to complete the same task as the high-responders. Low-responders had greater thigh SAT CSA (51-56%) than the high-responders with SCI. After adjusting to whole thigh CSA, IMF CSA was significantly greater in the low- responders; whereas skeletal muscle CSA was lower compared to the high-responders. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that thigh SAT and IMF act as insulation against propagation of current during surface NMES applications in individuals with SCI.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of regional thigh composition that result in different responses to current amplitude among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) during applications of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to evoke dynamic leg extension. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTINGS: Academic Settings. METHODS: Five males with chronic motor complete SCI completed 3 visits of NMES to determine the current amplitude required to evoke full knee extension. The participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging of both thighs to measure skeletal muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), thigh subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and intramuscular fat (IMF). Applicants were classified into high (n = 3) and low-responders (n = 2) based on the determined current amplitude. RESULTS: The low-responders required 48-59% greater current amplitude to complete the same task as the high-responders. Low-responders had greater thigh SAT CSA (51-56%) than the high-responders with SCI. After adjusting to whole thigh CSA, IMF CSA was significantly greater in the low- responders; whereas skeletal muscle CSA was lower compared to the high-responders. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that thigh SAT and IMF act as insulation against propagation of current during surface NMES applications in individuals with SCI.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883861654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883861654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/NRE-130941

DO - 10.3233/NRE-130941

M3 - Article

C2 - 23949041

AN - SCOPUS:84883861654

VL - 33

SP - 161

EP - 170

JO - NeuroRehabilitation

JF - NeuroRehabilitation

SN - 1053-8135

IS - 1

ER -