Differences in resting metabolic rate between white and African-American young adults

Teresa A. Sharp, Melanie L. Bell, Gary K. Grunwald, Kathryn Schmitz, Stephen Sidney, Cora E. Lewis, Kim Tolan, James O. Hill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: A reported lower resting metabolic rate (RMR) in African-American women than in white women could explain the higher prevalence of obesity in the former group. Little information is available on RMR in African-American men. Research Methods and Procedures: We assessed RMR by indirect calorimetry and body composition by DXA in 395 adults ages 28 to 40 years (100 African-American men, 95 white men, 94 African-American women, and 106 white women), recruited from participants in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA), Birmingham, Alabama, and Oakland, California, field centers. Results: Using linear models, fat-free mass, fat mass, visceral fat, and age were significantly related to RMR, but the usual level of physical activity was not. After adjustment for these variables, mean RMR was significantly higher in whites (1665.07 ± 10.78 kcal/d) than in African Americans (1585.05 ± 11.02 kcal/d) by 80 ± 16 kcal/d (p < 0.0001). The ethnic × gender interaction was not significant (p = 0.9512), indicating that the difference in RMR between African-American and white subjects was similar for men and women. Discussion: RMR is ∼5% higher in white than in African-American participants in CARDIA. The difference was the same for men and women and for lean and obese individuals. The prevalence of obesity is not higher in African-American men than in white men. Because of these reasons, we believe that RMR differences are unlikely to be a primary explanation for why African-American women are more prone to obesity than white women.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)726-732
Number of pages7
JournalObesity Research
Volume10
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Basal Metabolism
resting metabolic rate
African Americans
young adults
Young Adult
obesity
Obesity
coronary vessels
Coronary Vessels
Fats
Indirect Calorimetry
visceral fat
Intra-Abdominal Fat
calorimetry
research methods
lipids
Body Composition
physical activity
body composition
Linear Models

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Food Science
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Sharp, T. A., Bell, M. L., Grunwald, G. K., Schmitz, K., Sidney, S., Lewis, C. E., ... Hill, J. O. (2002). Differences in resting metabolic rate between white and African-American young adults. Obesity Research, 10(8), 726-732. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2002.99
Sharp, Teresa A. ; Bell, Melanie L. ; Grunwald, Gary K. ; Schmitz, Kathryn ; Sidney, Stephen ; Lewis, Cora E. ; Tolan, Kim ; Hill, James O. / Differences in resting metabolic rate between white and African-American young adults. In: Obesity Research. 2002 ; Vol. 10, No. 8. pp. 726-732.
@article{021b3a19b65c44f2bb45b8f77b6afb97,
title = "Differences in resting metabolic rate between white and African-American young adults",
abstract = "Objective: A reported lower resting metabolic rate (RMR) in African-American women than in white women could explain the higher prevalence of obesity in the former group. Little information is available on RMR in African-American men. Research Methods and Procedures: We assessed RMR by indirect calorimetry and body composition by DXA in 395 adults ages 28 to 40 years (100 African-American men, 95 white men, 94 African-American women, and 106 white women), recruited from participants in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA), Birmingham, Alabama, and Oakland, California, field centers. Results: Using linear models, fat-free mass, fat mass, visceral fat, and age were significantly related to RMR, but the usual level of physical activity was not. After adjustment for these variables, mean RMR was significantly higher in whites (1665.07 ± 10.78 kcal/d) than in African Americans (1585.05 ± 11.02 kcal/d) by 80 ± 16 kcal/d (p < 0.0001). The ethnic × gender interaction was not significant (p = 0.9512), indicating that the difference in RMR between African-American and white subjects was similar for men and women. Discussion: RMR is ∼5{\%} higher in white than in African-American participants in CARDIA. The difference was the same for men and women and for lean and obese individuals. The prevalence of obesity is not higher in African-American men than in white men. Because of these reasons, we believe that RMR differences are unlikely to be a primary explanation for why African-American women are more prone to obesity than white women.",
author = "Sharp, {Teresa A.} and Bell, {Melanie L.} and Grunwald, {Gary K.} and Kathryn Schmitz and Stephen Sidney and Lewis, {Cora E.} and Kim Tolan and Hill, {James O.}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/oby.2002.99",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "726--732",
journal = "Obesity",
issn = "1930-7381",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

Sharp, TA, Bell, ML, Grunwald, GK, Schmitz, K, Sidney, S, Lewis, CE, Tolan, K & Hill, JO 2002, 'Differences in resting metabolic rate between white and African-American young adults', Obesity Research, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 726-732. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2002.99

Differences in resting metabolic rate between white and African-American young adults. / Sharp, Teresa A.; Bell, Melanie L.; Grunwald, Gary K.; Schmitz, Kathryn; Sidney, Stephen; Lewis, Cora E.; Tolan, Kim; Hill, James O.

In: Obesity Research, Vol. 10, No. 8, 01.01.2002, p. 726-732.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in resting metabolic rate between white and African-American young adults

AU - Sharp, Teresa A.

AU - Bell, Melanie L.

AU - Grunwald, Gary K.

AU - Schmitz, Kathryn

AU - Sidney, Stephen

AU - Lewis, Cora E.

AU - Tolan, Kim

AU - Hill, James O.

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Objective: A reported lower resting metabolic rate (RMR) in African-American women than in white women could explain the higher prevalence of obesity in the former group. Little information is available on RMR in African-American men. Research Methods and Procedures: We assessed RMR by indirect calorimetry and body composition by DXA in 395 adults ages 28 to 40 years (100 African-American men, 95 white men, 94 African-American women, and 106 white women), recruited from participants in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA), Birmingham, Alabama, and Oakland, California, field centers. Results: Using linear models, fat-free mass, fat mass, visceral fat, and age were significantly related to RMR, but the usual level of physical activity was not. After adjustment for these variables, mean RMR was significantly higher in whites (1665.07 ± 10.78 kcal/d) than in African Americans (1585.05 ± 11.02 kcal/d) by 80 ± 16 kcal/d (p < 0.0001). The ethnic × gender interaction was not significant (p = 0.9512), indicating that the difference in RMR between African-American and white subjects was similar for men and women. Discussion: RMR is ∼5% higher in white than in African-American participants in CARDIA. The difference was the same for men and women and for lean and obese individuals. The prevalence of obesity is not higher in African-American men than in white men. Because of these reasons, we believe that RMR differences are unlikely to be a primary explanation for why African-American women are more prone to obesity than white women.

AB - Objective: A reported lower resting metabolic rate (RMR) in African-American women than in white women could explain the higher prevalence of obesity in the former group. Little information is available on RMR in African-American men. Research Methods and Procedures: We assessed RMR by indirect calorimetry and body composition by DXA in 395 adults ages 28 to 40 years (100 African-American men, 95 white men, 94 African-American women, and 106 white women), recruited from participants in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA), Birmingham, Alabama, and Oakland, California, field centers. Results: Using linear models, fat-free mass, fat mass, visceral fat, and age were significantly related to RMR, but the usual level of physical activity was not. After adjustment for these variables, mean RMR was significantly higher in whites (1665.07 ± 10.78 kcal/d) than in African Americans (1585.05 ± 11.02 kcal/d) by 80 ± 16 kcal/d (p < 0.0001). The ethnic × gender interaction was not significant (p = 0.9512), indicating that the difference in RMR between African-American and white subjects was similar for men and women. Discussion: RMR is ∼5% higher in white than in African-American participants in CARDIA. The difference was the same for men and women and for lean and obese individuals. The prevalence of obesity is not higher in African-American men than in white men. Because of these reasons, we believe that RMR differences are unlikely to be a primary explanation for why African-American women are more prone to obesity than white women.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036688881&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036688881&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/oby.2002.99

DO - 10.1038/oby.2002.99

M3 - Article

C2 - 12181380

AN - SCOPUS:0036688881

VL - 10

SP - 726

EP - 732

JO - Obesity

JF - Obesity

SN - 1930-7381

IS - 8

ER -