Differentially tuned responses to restricted versus prolonged awareness of threat: A preliminary fMRI investigation

Reginald B. Adams, Robert G. Franklin, Anthony J. Nelson, Heather L. Gordon, Robert E. Kleck, Paul J. Whalen, Nalini Ambady

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Responses to threat occur via two known independent processing routes. We propose that early, reflexive processing is predominantly tuned to the detection of congruent combinations of facial cues that signal threat, whereas later, reflective processing is predominantly tuned to incongruent combinations of threat. To test this prediction, we examined responses to threat-gaze expression pairs (anger versus fear expression by direct versus averted gaze). We report on two functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies, one employing prolonged presentations (2. s) of threat-gaze pairs to allow for reflective processing (Study 1), and one employing severely restricted (33. ms), backward masked presentations of threat-gaze pairs to isolate reflexive neural responding (Study 2). Our findings offer initial support for the conclusion that early, reflexive responses to threat are predominantly tuned to congruent threat-gaze pairings, whereas later reflective responses are predominantly tuned to ambiguous threat-gaze pairings. These findings highlight a distinct dual function in threat perception.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-119
Number of pages7
JournalBrain and cognition
Volume77
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2011

Fingerprint

Anger
Fear
Cues
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Threat
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Adams, Reginald B. ; Franklin, Robert G. ; Nelson, Anthony J. ; Gordon, Heather L. ; Kleck, Robert E. ; Whalen, Paul J. ; Ambady, Nalini. / Differentially tuned responses to restricted versus prolonged awareness of threat : A preliminary fMRI investigation. In: Brain and cognition. 2011 ; Vol. 77, No. 1. pp. 113-119.
@article{9f090b91319942379de36bbe25a28b36,
title = "Differentially tuned responses to restricted versus prolonged awareness of threat: A preliminary fMRI investigation",
abstract = "Responses to threat occur via two known independent processing routes. We propose that early, reflexive processing is predominantly tuned to the detection of congruent combinations of facial cues that signal threat, whereas later, reflective processing is predominantly tuned to incongruent combinations of threat. To test this prediction, we examined responses to threat-gaze expression pairs (anger versus fear expression by direct versus averted gaze). We report on two functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies, one employing prolonged presentations (2. s) of threat-gaze pairs to allow for reflective processing (Study 1), and one employing severely restricted (33. ms), backward masked presentations of threat-gaze pairs to isolate reflexive neural responding (Study 2). Our findings offer initial support for the conclusion that early, reflexive responses to threat are predominantly tuned to congruent threat-gaze pairings, whereas later reflective responses are predominantly tuned to ambiguous threat-gaze pairings. These findings highlight a distinct dual function in threat perception.",
author = "Adams, {Reginald B.} and Franklin, {Robert G.} and Nelson, {Anthony J.} and Gordon, {Heather L.} and Kleck, {Robert E.} and Whalen, {Paul J.} and Nalini Ambady",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.bandc.2011.05.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "113--119",
journal = "Brain and Cognition",
issn = "0278-2626",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Differentially tuned responses to restricted versus prolonged awareness of threat : A preliminary fMRI investigation. / Adams, Reginald B.; Franklin, Robert G.; Nelson, Anthony J.; Gordon, Heather L.; Kleck, Robert E.; Whalen, Paul J.; Ambady, Nalini.

In: Brain and cognition, Vol. 77, No. 1, 01.10.2011, p. 113-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differentially tuned responses to restricted versus prolonged awareness of threat

T2 - A preliminary fMRI investigation

AU - Adams, Reginald B.

AU - Franklin, Robert G.

AU - Nelson, Anthony J.

AU - Gordon, Heather L.

AU - Kleck, Robert E.

AU - Whalen, Paul J.

AU - Ambady, Nalini

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

N2 - Responses to threat occur via two known independent processing routes. We propose that early, reflexive processing is predominantly tuned to the detection of congruent combinations of facial cues that signal threat, whereas later, reflective processing is predominantly tuned to incongruent combinations of threat. To test this prediction, we examined responses to threat-gaze expression pairs (anger versus fear expression by direct versus averted gaze). We report on two functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies, one employing prolonged presentations (2. s) of threat-gaze pairs to allow for reflective processing (Study 1), and one employing severely restricted (33. ms), backward masked presentations of threat-gaze pairs to isolate reflexive neural responding (Study 2). Our findings offer initial support for the conclusion that early, reflexive responses to threat are predominantly tuned to congruent threat-gaze pairings, whereas later reflective responses are predominantly tuned to ambiguous threat-gaze pairings. These findings highlight a distinct dual function in threat perception.

AB - Responses to threat occur via two known independent processing routes. We propose that early, reflexive processing is predominantly tuned to the detection of congruent combinations of facial cues that signal threat, whereas later, reflective processing is predominantly tuned to incongruent combinations of threat. To test this prediction, we examined responses to threat-gaze expression pairs (anger versus fear expression by direct versus averted gaze). We report on two functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies, one employing prolonged presentations (2. s) of threat-gaze pairs to allow for reflective processing (Study 1), and one employing severely restricted (33. ms), backward masked presentations of threat-gaze pairs to isolate reflexive neural responding (Study 2). Our findings offer initial support for the conclusion that early, reflexive responses to threat are predominantly tuned to congruent threat-gaze pairings, whereas later reflective responses are predominantly tuned to ambiguous threat-gaze pairings. These findings highlight a distinct dual function in threat perception.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051675325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051675325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.05.001

DO - 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.05.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 21683500

AN - SCOPUS:80051675325

VL - 77

SP - 113

EP - 119

JO - Brain and Cognition

JF - Brain and Cognition

SN - 0278-2626

IS - 1

ER -