Differentiating hope from optimism by examining self-reported appraisals and linguistic content

Karen Gasper, Lauren A. Spencer, Brianna L. Middlewood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Even though hope and optimism are both positive states about desired future events, we hypothesized that their appraisals differ. Specifically, we hypothesized that hope would be associated with greater appraisals of uncertainty, importance, effortful action, morality, unpleasantness, and fear than optimism. Based on action identification theory, we also hypothesized that hope would encourage using more concrete language than optimism. In three experiments, respondents wrote about possible future events that instilled feelings of either hope or optimism. We assessed appraisals via respondents’ self-reports and by coding events for appraisal-relevant language. An internal meta-analysis of three experiments revealed that, compared to optimism, hope involved more uncertainty, importance, effortful action (self-reports only), unpleasantness, fear, and concrete language, but not more morality. These data suggest that even though hope arises when the distal future seems more uncertain and unpleasant, hope might help people obtain their goals by signaling importance, effort, and promoting concrete thinking.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Positive Psychology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Hope
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Linguistics
Language
Self Report
Uncertainty
Fear
Optimism
Meta-Analysis
Emotions

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{1a896c7979544376913060ad410b80cb,
title = "Differentiating hope from optimism by examining self-reported appraisals and linguistic content",
abstract = "Even though hope and optimism are both positive states about desired future events, we hypothesized that their appraisals differ. Specifically, we hypothesized that hope would be associated with greater appraisals of uncertainty, importance, effortful action, morality, unpleasantness, and fear than optimism. Based on action identification theory, we also hypothesized that hope would encourage using more concrete language than optimism. In three experiments, respondents wrote about possible future events that instilled feelings of either hope or optimism. We assessed appraisals via respondents’ self-reports and by coding events for appraisal-relevant language. An internal meta-analysis of three experiments revealed that, compared to optimism, hope involved more uncertainty, importance, effortful action (self-reports only), unpleasantness, fear, and concrete language, but not more morality. These data suggest that even though hope arises when the distal future seems more uncertain and unpleasant, hope might help people obtain their goals by signaling importance, effort, and promoting concrete thinking.",
author = "Karen Gasper and Spencer, {Lauren A.} and Middlewood, {Brianna L.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/17439760.2019.1590623",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Positive Psychology",
issn = "1743-9760",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Differentiating hope from optimism by examining self-reported appraisals and linguistic content. / Gasper, Karen; Spencer, Lauren A.; Middlewood, Brianna L.

In: Journal of Positive Psychology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differentiating hope from optimism by examining self-reported appraisals and linguistic content

AU - Gasper, Karen

AU - Spencer, Lauren A.

AU - Middlewood, Brianna L.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Even though hope and optimism are both positive states about desired future events, we hypothesized that their appraisals differ. Specifically, we hypothesized that hope would be associated with greater appraisals of uncertainty, importance, effortful action, morality, unpleasantness, and fear than optimism. Based on action identification theory, we also hypothesized that hope would encourage using more concrete language than optimism. In three experiments, respondents wrote about possible future events that instilled feelings of either hope or optimism. We assessed appraisals via respondents’ self-reports and by coding events for appraisal-relevant language. An internal meta-analysis of three experiments revealed that, compared to optimism, hope involved more uncertainty, importance, effortful action (self-reports only), unpleasantness, fear, and concrete language, but not more morality. These data suggest that even though hope arises when the distal future seems more uncertain and unpleasant, hope might help people obtain their goals by signaling importance, effort, and promoting concrete thinking.

AB - Even though hope and optimism are both positive states about desired future events, we hypothesized that their appraisals differ. Specifically, we hypothesized that hope would be associated with greater appraisals of uncertainty, importance, effortful action, morality, unpleasantness, and fear than optimism. Based on action identification theory, we also hypothesized that hope would encourage using more concrete language than optimism. In three experiments, respondents wrote about possible future events that instilled feelings of either hope or optimism. We assessed appraisals via respondents’ self-reports and by coding events for appraisal-relevant language. An internal meta-analysis of three experiments revealed that, compared to optimism, hope involved more uncertainty, importance, effortful action (self-reports only), unpleasantness, fear, and concrete language, but not more morality. These data suggest that even though hope arises when the distal future seems more uncertain and unpleasant, hope might help people obtain their goals by signaling importance, effort, and promoting concrete thinking.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063106603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063106603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17439760.2019.1590623

DO - 10.1080/17439760.2019.1590623

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85063106603

JO - Journal of Positive Psychology

JF - Journal of Positive Psychology

SN - 1743-9760

ER -