Digital image comparison using feature extraction and luminance matching

Ray Bachnak, Carl Steidley, Jeng Funtanilla

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

This paper presents the results of comparing two digital images acquired using two different light sources. One of the sources is a 50-W metal halide lamp located in the compartment of an industrial borescope and the other is a 1 W LED placed at the tip of the insertion tube of the borescope. The two images are compared quantitatively and qualitatively using feature extraction and luminance matching approaches. Quantitative methods included the images' histograms, intensity profiles along a lie segment, edges, and luminance measurement. Qualitative methods included image registration and linear conformal transformation with eight control points. This transformation is useful when shapes in the input image are unchanged, but the image is distorted by some combination of translation, rotation, and scaling. The graylevel histogram, edge detection, image profile and image registration do not offer conclusive results. The LED light source, however, produces good images for visual inspection by the operator. The paper presents the results and discusses the usefulness and shortcomings of various comparison methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number02
Pages (from-to)12-22
Number of pages11
JournalProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
Volume5672
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 20 2005
EventProceedings of SPIE-IS and T Electronic Imaging - Image Processing: Algorithms and Systems IV - San Jose, CA, United States
Duration: Jan 17 2005Jan 18 2005

Fingerprint

Luminance
Image registration
luminance
Digital Image
pattern recognition
Feature Extraction
Light emitting diodes
Light sources
Feature extraction
Metal halide lamps
Edge detection
Inspection
Image Registration
Histogram
endoscopes
Qualitative Methods
histograms
Conformal Transformation
Comparison Method
light sources

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

@article{22d5d69270f64702bf30c454d4f9394c,
title = "Digital image comparison using feature extraction and luminance matching",
abstract = "This paper presents the results of comparing two digital images acquired using two different light sources. One of the sources is a 50-W metal halide lamp located in the compartment of an industrial borescope and the other is a 1 W LED placed at the tip of the insertion tube of the borescope. The two images are compared quantitatively and qualitatively using feature extraction and luminance matching approaches. Quantitative methods included the images' histograms, intensity profiles along a lie segment, edges, and luminance measurement. Qualitative methods included image registration and linear conformal transformation with eight control points. This transformation is useful when shapes in the input image are unchanged, but the image is distorted by some combination of translation, rotation, and scaling. The graylevel histogram, edge detection, image profile and image registration do not offer conclusive results. The LED light source, however, produces good images for visual inspection by the operator. The paper presents the results and discusses the usefulness and shortcomings of various comparison methods.",
author = "Ray Bachnak and Carl Steidley and Jeng Funtanilla",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1117/12.585955",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5672",
pages = "12--22",
journal = "Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering",
issn = "0277-786X",
publisher = "SPIE",

}

Digital image comparison using feature extraction and luminance matching. / Bachnak, Ray; Steidley, Carl; Funtanilla, Jeng.

In: Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, Vol. 5672, 02, 20.07.2005, p. 12-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Digital image comparison using feature extraction and luminance matching

AU - Bachnak, Ray

AU - Steidley, Carl

AU - Funtanilla, Jeng

PY - 2005/7/20

Y1 - 2005/7/20

N2 - This paper presents the results of comparing two digital images acquired using two different light sources. One of the sources is a 50-W metal halide lamp located in the compartment of an industrial borescope and the other is a 1 W LED placed at the tip of the insertion tube of the borescope. The two images are compared quantitatively and qualitatively using feature extraction and luminance matching approaches. Quantitative methods included the images' histograms, intensity profiles along a lie segment, edges, and luminance measurement. Qualitative methods included image registration and linear conformal transformation with eight control points. This transformation is useful when shapes in the input image are unchanged, but the image is distorted by some combination of translation, rotation, and scaling. The graylevel histogram, edge detection, image profile and image registration do not offer conclusive results. The LED light source, however, produces good images for visual inspection by the operator. The paper presents the results and discusses the usefulness and shortcomings of various comparison methods.

AB - This paper presents the results of comparing two digital images acquired using two different light sources. One of the sources is a 50-W metal halide lamp located in the compartment of an industrial borescope and the other is a 1 W LED placed at the tip of the insertion tube of the borescope. The two images are compared quantitatively and qualitatively using feature extraction and luminance matching approaches. Quantitative methods included the images' histograms, intensity profiles along a lie segment, edges, and luminance measurement. Qualitative methods included image registration and linear conformal transformation with eight control points. This transformation is useful when shapes in the input image are unchanged, but the image is distorted by some combination of translation, rotation, and scaling. The graylevel histogram, edge detection, image profile and image registration do not offer conclusive results. The LED light source, however, produces good images for visual inspection by the operator. The paper presents the results and discusses the usefulness and shortcomings of various comparison methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21944439858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21944439858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1117/12.585955

DO - 10.1117/12.585955

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:21944439858

VL - 5672

SP - 12

EP - 22

JO - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

JF - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

SN - 0277-786X

M1 - 02

ER -