TY - JOUR
T1 - Discrete emotional responses and face-to-face complaining
T2 - The joint effect of service failure type and culture
AU - Luo, Anqi
AU - Mattila, Anna S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was financially supported by the Marriott Foundation .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - Understanding customer responses to service failures enable practitioners to minimize the negative impact of service failures. The purpose of this study is to examine the joint effect of service failure type and culture (power distance) on two discrete negative emotions and investigate the mediating role of discrete negative emotions in driving face-to-face complaining and switching behavior across two cultures (The US and China). Our findings suggest that customers in a high-power distance culture (China) feel higher levels of anger and disappointment following a process (vs. outcome) failure, and therefore, are more likely to complain face-to-face and switch. Whereas customers in a low-power distance culture (US) only feel higher levels of disappointment following an outcome (vs. process) failure, yet prefer to switch silently. Our findings provide hospitality firms with practical implications on employee training and how to proactively identify service failures that customers are unlikely to complain about.
AB - Understanding customer responses to service failures enable practitioners to minimize the negative impact of service failures. The purpose of this study is to examine the joint effect of service failure type and culture (power distance) on two discrete negative emotions and investigate the mediating role of discrete negative emotions in driving face-to-face complaining and switching behavior across two cultures (The US and China). Our findings suggest that customers in a high-power distance culture (China) feel higher levels of anger and disappointment following a process (vs. outcome) failure, and therefore, are more likely to complain face-to-face and switch. Whereas customers in a low-power distance culture (US) only feel higher levels of disappointment following an outcome (vs. process) failure, yet prefer to switch silently. Our findings provide hospitality firms with practical implications on employee training and how to proactively identify service failures that customers are unlikely to complain about.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088028348&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85088028348&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102613
DO - 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102613
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85088028348
VL - 90
JO - International Journal of Hospitality Management
JF - International Journal of Hospitality Management
SN - 0278-4319
M1 - 102613
ER -