Abstract

Virtual screening is one of the major tools used in computer-aided drug discovery. In structure-based virtual screening, the scoring function is critical to identifying the correct docking pose and accurately predicting the binding affinities of compounds. However, the performance of existing scoring functions has been shown to be uneven for different targets, and some important drug targets have proven especially challenging. In these targets, scoring functions cannot accurately identify the native or near-native binding pose of the ligand from among decoy poses, which affects both the accuracy of the binding affinity prediction and the ability of virtual screening to identify true binders in chemical libraries. Here, we present an approach to discriminating native poses from decoys in difficult targets for which several scoring functions failed to correctly identify the native pose. Our approach employs Discrete Molecular Dynamics simulations to incorporate protein-ligand dynamics and the entropic effects of binding. We analyze a collection of poses generated by docking and find that the residence time of the ligand in the native and nativelike binding poses is distinctly longer than that in decoy poses. This finding suggests that molecular simulations offer a unique approach to distinguishing the native (or nativelike) binding pose from decoy poses that cannot be distinguished using scoring functions that evaluate static structures. The success of our method emphasizes the importance of protein-ligand dynamics in the accurate determination of the binding pose, an aspect that is not addressed in typical docking and scoring protocols.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)144-151
Number of pages8
JournalBiophysical Journal
Volume102
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 4 2012

Fingerprint

Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Ligands
Small Molecule Libraries
Drug Discovery
Proteins
Pharmaceutical Preparations

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biophysics

Cite this

@article{56069b34a70f44579dc5d1f7fe3f8d57,
title = "Discrete molecular dynamics distinguishes nativelike binding poses from decoys in difficult targets",
abstract = "Virtual screening is one of the major tools used in computer-aided drug discovery. In structure-based virtual screening, the scoring function is critical to identifying the correct docking pose and accurately predicting the binding affinities of compounds. However, the performance of existing scoring functions has been shown to be uneven for different targets, and some important drug targets have proven especially challenging. In these targets, scoring functions cannot accurately identify the native or near-native binding pose of the ligand from among decoy poses, which affects both the accuracy of the binding affinity prediction and the ability of virtual screening to identify true binders in chemical libraries. Here, we present an approach to discriminating native poses from decoys in difficult targets for which several scoring functions failed to correctly identify the native pose. Our approach employs Discrete Molecular Dynamics simulations to incorporate protein-ligand dynamics and the entropic effects of binding. We analyze a collection of poses generated by docking and find that the residence time of the ligand in the native and nativelike binding poses is distinctly longer than that in decoy poses. This finding suggests that molecular simulations offer a unique approach to distinguishing the native (or nativelike) binding pose from decoy poses that cannot be distinguished using scoring functions that evaluate static structures. The success of our method emphasizes the importance of protein-ligand dynamics in the accurate determination of the binding pose, an aspect that is not addressed in typical docking and scoring protocols.",
author = "Proctor, {Elizabeth Anne} and Shuangye Yin and Alexander Tropsha and Nikolay Dokholyan",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.bpj.2011.11.4008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "144--151",
journal = "Biophysical Journal",
issn = "0006-3495",
publisher = "Biophysical Society",
number = "1",

}

Discrete molecular dynamics distinguishes nativelike binding poses from decoys in difficult targets. / Proctor, Elizabeth Anne; Yin, Shuangye; Tropsha, Alexander; Dokholyan, Nikolay.

In: Biophysical Journal, Vol. 102, No. 1, 04.01.2012, p. 144-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discrete molecular dynamics distinguishes nativelike binding poses from decoys in difficult targets

AU - Proctor, Elizabeth Anne

AU - Yin, Shuangye

AU - Tropsha, Alexander

AU - Dokholyan, Nikolay

PY - 2012/1/4

Y1 - 2012/1/4

N2 - Virtual screening is one of the major tools used in computer-aided drug discovery. In structure-based virtual screening, the scoring function is critical to identifying the correct docking pose and accurately predicting the binding affinities of compounds. However, the performance of existing scoring functions has been shown to be uneven for different targets, and some important drug targets have proven especially challenging. In these targets, scoring functions cannot accurately identify the native or near-native binding pose of the ligand from among decoy poses, which affects both the accuracy of the binding affinity prediction and the ability of virtual screening to identify true binders in chemical libraries. Here, we present an approach to discriminating native poses from decoys in difficult targets for which several scoring functions failed to correctly identify the native pose. Our approach employs Discrete Molecular Dynamics simulations to incorporate protein-ligand dynamics and the entropic effects of binding. We analyze a collection of poses generated by docking and find that the residence time of the ligand in the native and nativelike binding poses is distinctly longer than that in decoy poses. This finding suggests that molecular simulations offer a unique approach to distinguishing the native (or nativelike) binding pose from decoy poses that cannot be distinguished using scoring functions that evaluate static structures. The success of our method emphasizes the importance of protein-ligand dynamics in the accurate determination of the binding pose, an aspect that is not addressed in typical docking and scoring protocols.

AB - Virtual screening is one of the major tools used in computer-aided drug discovery. In structure-based virtual screening, the scoring function is critical to identifying the correct docking pose and accurately predicting the binding affinities of compounds. However, the performance of existing scoring functions has been shown to be uneven for different targets, and some important drug targets have proven especially challenging. In these targets, scoring functions cannot accurately identify the native or near-native binding pose of the ligand from among decoy poses, which affects both the accuracy of the binding affinity prediction and the ability of virtual screening to identify true binders in chemical libraries. Here, we present an approach to discriminating native poses from decoys in difficult targets for which several scoring functions failed to correctly identify the native pose. Our approach employs Discrete Molecular Dynamics simulations to incorporate protein-ligand dynamics and the entropic effects of binding. We analyze a collection of poses generated by docking and find that the residence time of the ligand in the native and nativelike binding poses is distinctly longer than that in decoy poses. This finding suggests that molecular simulations offer a unique approach to distinguishing the native (or nativelike) binding pose from decoy poses that cannot be distinguished using scoring functions that evaluate static structures. The success of our method emphasizes the importance of protein-ligand dynamics in the accurate determination of the binding pose, an aspect that is not addressed in typical docking and scoring protocols.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855438940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855438940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.11.4008

DO - 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.11.4008

M3 - Article

C2 - 22225808

AN - SCOPUS:84855438940

VL - 102

SP - 144

EP - 151

JO - Biophysical Journal

JF - Biophysical Journal

SN - 0006-3495

IS - 1

ER -