Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Treatment Delay Within Appalachia-The Role of For-Profit Hospitals

Eric E. Seiber, Fabian Camacho, Muhammad Fazal Zeeshan, Teresa Kern, Steven T. Fleming

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Appalachian residents have a higher overall cancer burden than the rest of the United States because of the unique features of the region. Treatment delays vary widely within Appalachia, with colorectal cancer patients undergoing median treatment delays of 5 days in Kentucky compared to 9 days for patients in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and North Carolina combined. Objective: This study identified the source of this disparity in treatment delay using statistical decomposition techniques. Methodology: This study used linked 2006 to 2008 cancer registry and Medicare claims data for the Appalachian counties of Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and North Carolina to estimate a 2-part model of treatment delay. An Oaxaca Decomposition of the 2-part model revealed the contribution of the individual determinants to the disparity in delay between Kentucky counties and the remaining 3 states. Results: The Oaxaca Decomposition revealed that the higher percentage of patients treated at for-profit facilities in Kentucky proved the key contributor to the observed disparity. In Kentucky, 22.3% patients began their treatment at a for-profit facility compared to 1.4% in the remaining states. Patients initiating treatment at for-profit facilities explained 79% of the observed difference in immediate treatment (<2 days after diagnosis) and 72% of Kentucky's advantage in log days to treatment. Conclusions: The unique role of for-profit facilities led to reduced treatment delay for colorectal cancer patients in Kentucky. However, it remains unknown whether for-profit hospitals' more rapid treatment converts to better health outcomes for colorectal cancer patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)382-391
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Rural Health
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Appalachian Region
Colorectal Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Medicare
Registries
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Seiber, Eric E. ; Camacho, Fabian ; Zeeshan, Muhammad Fazal ; Kern, Teresa ; Fleming, Steven T. / Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Treatment Delay Within Appalachia-The Role of For-Profit Hospitals. In: Journal of Rural Health. 2015 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 382-391.
@article{84b84ee5d9df4da0b4866fe5a9392063,
title = "Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Treatment Delay Within Appalachia-The Role of For-Profit Hospitals",
abstract = "Background: Appalachian residents have a higher overall cancer burden than the rest of the United States because of the unique features of the region. Treatment delays vary widely within Appalachia, with colorectal cancer patients undergoing median treatment delays of 5 days in Kentucky compared to 9 days for patients in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and North Carolina combined. Objective: This study identified the source of this disparity in treatment delay using statistical decomposition techniques. Methodology: This study used linked 2006 to 2008 cancer registry and Medicare claims data for the Appalachian counties of Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and North Carolina to estimate a 2-part model of treatment delay. An Oaxaca Decomposition of the 2-part model revealed the contribution of the individual determinants to the disparity in delay between Kentucky counties and the remaining 3 states. Results: The Oaxaca Decomposition revealed that the higher percentage of patients treated at for-profit facilities in Kentucky proved the key contributor to the observed disparity. In Kentucky, 22.3{\%} patients began their treatment at a for-profit facility compared to 1.4{\%} in the remaining states. Patients initiating treatment at for-profit facilities explained 79{\%} of the observed difference in immediate treatment (<2 days after diagnosis) and 72{\%} of Kentucky's advantage in log days to treatment. Conclusions: The unique role of for-profit facilities led to reduced treatment delay for colorectal cancer patients in Kentucky. However, it remains unknown whether for-profit hospitals' more rapid treatment converts to better health outcomes for colorectal cancer patients.",
author = "Seiber, {Eric E.} and Fabian Camacho and Zeeshan, {Muhammad Fazal} and Teresa Kern and Fleming, {Steven T.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jrh.12122",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "382--391",
journal = "Journal of Rural Health",
issn = "0890-765X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Treatment Delay Within Appalachia-The Role of For-Profit Hospitals. / Seiber, Eric E.; Camacho, Fabian; Zeeshan, Muhammad Fazal; Kern, Teresa; Fleming, Steven T.

In: Journal of Rural Health, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.09.2015, p. 382-391.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Treatment Delay Within Appalachia-The Role of For-Profit Hospitals

AU - Seiber, Eric E.

AU - Camacho, Fabian

AU - Zeeshan, Muhammad Fazal

AU - Kern, Teresa

AU - Fleming, Steven T.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Background: Appalachian residents have a higher overall cancer burden than the rest of the United States because of the unique features of the region. Treatment delays vary widely within Appalachia, with colorectal cancer patients undergoing median treatment delays of 5 days in Kentucky compared to 9 days for patients in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and North Carolina combined. Objective: This study identified the source of this disparity in treatment delay using statistical decomposition techniques. Methodology: This study used linked 2006 to 2008 cancer registry and Medicare claims data for the Appalachian counties of Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and North Carolina to estimate a 2-part model of treatment delay. An Oaxaca Decomposition of the 2-part model revealed the contribution of the individual determinants to the disparity in delay between Kentucky counties and the remaining 3 states. Results: The Oaxaca Decomposition revealed that the higher percentage of patients treated at for-profit facilities in Kentucky proved the key contributor to the observed disparity. In Kentucky, 22.3% patients began their treatment at a for-profit facility compared to 1.4% in the remaining states. Patients initiating treatment at for-profit facilities explained 79% of the observed difference in immediate treatment (<2 days after diagnosis) and 72% of Kentucky's advantage in log days to treatment. Conclusions: The unique role of for-profit facilities led to reduced treatment delay for colorectal cancer patients in Kentucky. However, it remains unknown whether for-profit hospitals' more rapid treatment converts to better health outcomes for colorectal cancer patients.

AB - Background: Appalachian residents have a higher overall cancer burden than the rest of the United States because of the unique features of the region. Treatment delays vary widely within Appalachia, with colorectal cancer patients undergoing median treatment delays of 5 days in Kentucky compared to 9 days for patients in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and North Carolina combined. Objective: This study identified the source of this disparity in treatment delay using statistical decomposition techniques. Methodology: This study used linked 2006 to 2008 cancer registry and Medicare claims data for the Appalachian counties of Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and North Carolina to estimate a 2-part model of treatment delay. An Oaxaca Decomposition of the 2-part model revealed the contribution of the individual determinants to the disparity in delay between Kentucky counties and the remaining 3 states. Results: The Oaxaca Decomposition revealed that the higher percentage of patients treated at for-profit facilities in Kentucky proved the key contributor to the observed disparity. In Kentucky, 22.3% patients began their treatment at a for-profit facility compared to 1.4% in the remaining states. Patients initiating treatment at for-profit facilities explained 79% of the observed difference in immediate treatment (<2 days after diagnosis) and 72% of Kentucky's advantage in log days to treatment. Conclusions: The unique role of for-profit facilities led to reduced treatment delay for colorectal cancer patients in Kentucky. However, it remains unknown whether for-profit hospitals' more rapid treatment converts to better health outcomes for colorectal cancer patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943358104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943358104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jrh.12122

DO - 10.1111/jrh.12122

M3 - Article

C2 - 26032695

AN - SCOPUS:84943358104

VL - 31

SP - 382

EP - 391

JO - Journal of Rural Health

JF - Journal of Rural Health

SN - 0890-765X

IS - 4

ER -